Experimental maxillary sinus augmentation using a highly bioactive glass ceramic

被引:0
|
作者
Rodrigo Ricci Vivan
Carlos Eduardo Mecca
Claudia Cristina Biguetti
Ana Claudia Muniz Rennó
Roberta Okamoto
Bruno Cavalini Cavenago
Marco Húngaro Duarte
Mariza Akemi Matsumoto
机构
[1] University of São Paulo – FOB/USP,Department of Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, Bauru School of Dentistry
[2] Sagrado Coração University – USC,Oral Biology Master’s Program
[3] University of São Paulo – FOB/USP,Oral Biology Doctoral’s Program, Bauru School of Dentistry
[4] Federal University of Sao Paulo,Department of Bioscience
[5] São Paulo State University,Department of Basic Sciences, Araçatuba School of Dentistry
[6] FOA/UNESP,Oral Biology Doctoral’s Program
[7] Sagrado Coração University,undefined
[8] USC,undefined
[9] CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico),undefined
关键词
Bone Graft; Maxillary Sinus; Bioactive Glass; Foreign Body Reaction; Autogenous Bone Graft;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Physicochemical characteristics of a biomaterial directly influence its biological behavior and fate. However, anatomical and physiological particularities of the recipient site also seem to contribute with this process. The present study aimed to evaluate bone healing of maxillary sinus augmentation using a novel bioactive glass ceramic in comparison with a bovine hydroxyapatite. Bilateral sinus augmentation was performed in adult male rabbits, divided into 4 groups according to the biomaterial used: BO—particulate bovine HA Bio-Oss® (BO), BO+G—particulate bovine HA + particulate autogenous bone graft (G), BS—particulate glass ceramic (180–212 μm) Biosilicate® (BS), and BS+G—particulate glass ceramic + G. After 45 and 90 days, animals were euthanized and the specimens prepared to be analyzed under light and polarized microscopy, immunohistochemistry, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and micro-computed tomography (μCT). Results revealed different degradation pattern between both biomaterials, despite the association with bone graft. BS caused a more intense chronic inflammation with foreign body reaction, which led to a difficulty in bone formation. Besides this evidence, SEM and μCT confirmed direct contact between newly formed bone and biomaterial, along with osteopontin and osteocalcin immunolabeling. Bone matrix mineralization was late in BS group but became similar to BO at day 90. These results clearly indicate that further studies about Biosilicate® are necessary to identify the factors that resulted in an unfavorable healing response when used in maxillary sinus augmentation.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Experimental maxillary sinus augmentation using a highly bioactive glass ceramic
    Vivan, Rodrigo Ricci
    Mecca, Carlos Eduardo
    Biguetti, Claudia Cristina
    Muniz Renno, Ana Claudia
    Okamoto, Roberta
    Cavenago, Bruno Cavalini
    Duarte, Marco Hungaro
    Matsumoto, Mariza Akemi
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE-MATERIALS IN MEDICINE, 2016, 27 (02) : 1 - 10
  • [2] Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using Ceramic Alloplastic Granules or Paste: An Experimental Study in Rabbits
    Costa, Michael Medeiros
    Botticelli, Daniele
    Moses, Ofer
    Omori, Yuki
    Fujiwara, Shigeo
    Silva, Erick Ricardo
    Xavier, Samuel Porfirio
    DENTISTRY JOURNAL, 2021, 9 (06)
  • [3] Bioactive glass granules as a bone adjunctive material in maxillary sinus floor augmentation
    Turunen, T
    Peltola, J
    Yli-Urpo, A
    Happonen, RP
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2004, 15 (02) : 135 - 141
  • [4] Maxillary sinus floor augmentation using bioactive glass granules and autogenous bone with simultaneous implant placement - Clinical and histological findings
    Cordioli, G
    Mazzocco, C
    Schepers, E
    Brugnolo, E
    Majzoub, Z
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2001, 12 (03) : 270 - 278
  • [5] Maxillary sinus augmentation with microstructured tricalcium phosphate ceramic in sheep
    Klijn, R. J.
    Hoekstra, J. W. M.
    Van Den Beucken, J. J. J. P.
    Meijer, G. J.
    Jansen, J. A.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2012, 23 (03) : 274 - 280
  • [6] Maxillary Sinus Augmentation
    Aldelaimi, Tahrir N.
    Khalil, Afrah A.
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 27 (06) : E557 - E559
  • [7] Bone quality after filling of the maxillary sinus with a bioactive glass
    Burt-Pichat, Brigitte
    Rizzo, Sebastien
    Hemar, Julie
    Venet, Laurent
    Sauvigne, Thierry
    Franca, Estelle
    Boivin, Georges
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2014, 29 : S135 - S136
  • [8] MAXILLARY SINUS AUGMENTATION - HISTOMORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF GRAFT MATERIALS FOR MAXILLARY SINUS FLOOR AUGMENTATION
    MOY, PK
    LUNDGREN, S
    HOLMES, RE
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1993, 51 (08) : 857 - 862
  • [9] ESSENIALS OF MAXILLARY SINUS AUGMENTATION
    Gabric, Dragana
    ACTA STOMATOLOGICA CROATICA, 2019, 53 (01) : 88 - 88
  • [10] Bioactive glass added to autogenous bone graft in maxillary sinus augmentation: a prospective histomorphometric, immunohistochemical, and bone graft resorption assessment
    Menezes, Juliana Dreyer
    Pereira, Rodrigo dos Santos
    Bonardi, Joao Paulo
    Griza, Geraldo Luiz
    Okamoto, Roberta
    Hochuli-Vieira, Eduardo
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ORAL SCIENCE, 2018, 26 : e20170296