Accounting for risk in valuing forest carbon offsets

被引:35
|
作者
Hurteau M.D. [1 ]
Hungate B.A. [1 ]
Koch G.W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Biological Sciences, Merriam-Powell Center for Environmental Research, Flagstaff, AZ 86011
关键词
Forest Carbon; Fire Event; Carbon Loss; Fire Suppression; Fire Size;
D O I
10.1186/1750-0680-4-1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Forests can sequester carbon dioxide, thereby reducing atmospheric concentrations and slowing global warming. In the U.S., forest carbon stocks have increased as a result of regrowth following land abandonment and in-growth due to fire suppression, and they currently sequester approximately 10% of annual US emissions. This ecosystem service is recognized in greenhouse gas protocols and cap-and-trade mechanisms, yet forest carbon is valued equally regardless of forest type, an approach that fails to account for risk of carbon loss from disturbance. Results: Here we show that incorporating wildfire risk reduces the value of forest carbon depending on the location and condition of the forest. There is a general trend of decreasing risk-scaled forest carbon value moving from the northern toward the southern continental U.S. Conclusion: Because disturbance is a major ecological factor influencing long-term carbon storage and is often sensitive to human management, carbon trading mechanisms should account for the reduction in value associated with disturbance risk. © 2009 Hurteau et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] How costly are carbon offsets? A meta-analysis of carbon forest sinks
    van Kooten, GC
    Eagle, AJ
    Manley, J
    Smolak, T
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2004, 7 (04) : 239 - 251
  • [22] EU adopts scientific forest carbon accounting
    Pelley, Janet
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 16 (06) : 312 - 312
  • [23] Valuing and accounting for loan guarantees
    Mody, A
    Patro, DK
    WORLD BANK RESEARCH OBSERVER, 1996, 11 (01): : 119 - 142
  • [24] Western Newfoundland Model Forest and carbon accounting
    Taylor, J
    FORESTRY CHRONICLE, 2005, 81 (03): : 306 - 306
  • [25] Spatial predictions and uncertainties of forest carbon fluxes for carbon accounting
    Arnan Araza
    Sytze de Bruin
    Lars Hein
    Martin Herold
    Scientific Reports, 13 (1)
  • [26] Spatial predictions and uncertainties of forest carbon fluxes for carbon accounting
    Araza, Arnan
    de Bruin, Sytze
    Hein, Lars
    Herold, Martin
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01):
  • [27] Blockchain's potential in forest offsets, the voluntary carbon markets and REDD
    Kotsialou, Grammateia
    Kuralbayeva, Karlygash
    Laing, Timothy
    ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2022, 49 (03) : 137 - 145
  • [28] Forest Carbon Offsets and Environmental Benefits: An Argument for Consistent Domestic Policymaking
    Mortimer, Michael J.
    Malmsheimer, Robert W.
    Prisley, Stephen P.
    JOURNAL OF FORESTRY, 2011, 109 (03) : 177 - 178
  • [29] California air resources board forest carbon protocol invalidates offsets
    Marino, Bruno D., V
    Mincheva, Martina
    Doucett, Aaron
    PEERJ, 2019, 7
  • [30] Carbon offsets, reversal risk and US climate policy
    Mignone B.K.
    Hurteau M.D.
    Chen Y.
    Sohngen B.
    Carbon Balance and Management, 4 (1)