Progesterone and estrogen receptors in pregnant and premenopausal non-pregnant normal human breast

被引:0
|
作者
DeShawn Taylor
Celeste Leigh Pearce
Linda Hovanessian-Larsen
Susan Downey
Darcy V. Spicer
Sue Bartow
Malcolm C. Pike
Anna H. Wu
Debra Hawes
机构
[1] University of Southern California,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine
[2] University of Southern California,Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine
[3] University of Southern California,Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine
[4] University of Southern California,Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine
[5] University of Southern California,Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine
[6] University of New Mexico,Department of Pathology
[7] University of Southern California,Department of Pathology, Keck School of Medicine
[8] USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center,undefined
来源
关键词
Breast; Estrogen receptor; Progesterone receptor; Parity; Pregnancy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We report here our studies of nuclear staining for the progesterone and estrogen receptors (PRA, PRB, ERα) and cell proliferation (MIB1) in the breast terminal duct lobular unit epithelium of 26 naturally cycling premenopausal women and 30 pregnant women (median 8.1 weeks gestation). Square root transformations of the PRA, PRB and ERα values, and a logarithmic transformation of the MIB1 values, were made to achieve more normal distributions of the values. PRA expression decreased from a mean of 17.8% of epithelial cells in cycling subjects to 6.2% in pregnant subjects (P = 0.013). MIB1 expression increased from 1.7% in cycling subjects to 16.0% in pregnant subjects (P < 0.001). PRB and ERα expression was slightly lower in pregnant subjects but the differences were not statistically significant. Sixteen of the non-pregnant subjects were nulliparous and ten were parous so that we had limited power to detect changes associated with parity. PRA was statistically significantly lower in parous women than in nulliparous women (32.2% in nulliparous women vs. 10.2%; P = 0.014). PRB (23.5 vs. 12.9%), ERα (14.4 vs. 8.6%) and MIB1 (2.2 vs. 1.2%) were also lower in parous women, but the differences were not statistically significant. The marked decreases in PRA in pregnancy and in parous women has also been found in the rat. A reduction in PRA expression may be a useful marker of the reduction in risk with pregnancy and may be of use in evaluating the effect of any chemoprevention regimen aimed at mimicking pregnancy. Short-term changes in PRA expression while the chemoprevention is being administered may be a more useful marker.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 168
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条