In-house processing of 3D printable polyetheretherketone (PEEK) filaments and the effect of fused deposition modeling parameters on 3D-printed PEEK structures

被引:0
|
作者
Bharath Tej Challa
Sudeep Kumar Gummadi
Karim Elhattab
Jordan Ahlstrom
Prabaha Sikder
机构
[1] Cleveland State University,Department of Mechanical Engineering
[2] The University of Toledo,Department of Mechanical, Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering
关键词
Fused deposition modeling; 3D printing; Poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK); Filaments; Mechanical properties;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
3D printing, specifically fused deposition modeling (FDM) of poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK), is one of the most powerful and efficient state-of-the-art manufacturing techniques. However, FDM of PEEK is challenging. Indeed, it is critical to consider specific 3D printing parameters and filament feedstock quality to achieve optimum mechanical properties in the 3D-printed PEEK parts. In this paper, we investigate the effect of specific 3D printing parameters such as nozzle and chamber temperature, print speed, and layer height on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed PEEK. Moreover, we explore the effect of filament quality on the structures’ mechanical properties. In that regard, we developed PEEK filaments using a customized extruder setup in-house and used those laboratory-developed filaments (LD) to 3D print PEEK structures suitable for mechanical testing (tensile, compression, and flexural testing) and compared them to the mechanical properties of 3D-printed parts that were developed using commercially available (CA) filaments. Results indicate that an optimum combination of a nozzle and chamber temperature, print speed, and layer height is appropriate to achieve 3D-printed parts with optimum mechanical properties. Notably, results confirmed no significant differences between the specimen groups developed using LD and CA filaments, highlighting that the LD filaments were of comparable quality to the CA ones. The highest mean strengths recorded for the parts printed with the LD filaments were 106.45 MPa (compressive), 85.43 MPa (tensile), and 102.63 MPa (flexural). This paper confirms that high-quality PEEK-based filaments can be developed in-house to yield 3D-printed PEEK parts with optimum mechanical properties.
引用
收藏
页码:1675 / 1688
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Improved design of fused deposition modeling equipment for 3D printing of high-performance PEEK parts
    Hu, Bin
    Duan, Xianbao
    Xing, Zehua
    Xu, Ziyou
    Du, Chun
    Zhou, Huamin
    Chen, Rong
    Shan, Bin
    MECHANICS OF MATERIALS, 2019, 137
  • [22] Quantitative Assessment of Point-of-Care 3D-Printed Patient-Specific Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Cranial Implants
    Sharma, Neha
    Aghlmandi, Soheila
    Dalcanale, Federico
    Seiler, Daniel
    Zeilhofer, Hans-Florian
    Honigmann, Philipp
    Thieringer, Florian M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2021, 22 (16)
  • [23] Interlayer bonding strength of 3D printed PEEK specimens
    Liaw, Chya-Yan
    Tolbert, John W.
    Chow, Lesley W.
    Guvendiren, Murat
    SOFT MATTER, 2021, 17 (18) : 4775 - 4789
  • [24] The Surface Characterisation of Fused Filament Fabricated (FFF) 3D Printed PEEK/Hydroxyapatite Composites
    Rodzen, Krzysztof
    McIvor, Mary Josephine
    Sharma, Preetam K.
    Acheson, Jonathan G.
    McIlhagger, Alistair
    Mokhtari, Mozaffar
    McFerran, Aoife
    Ward, Joanna
    Meenan, Brian J.
    Boyd, Adrian R.
    POLYMERS, 2021, 13 (18)
  • [25] Infill strategies for 3D-printed CF-PEEK/HA-PEEK honeycomb core-shell composite structures
    Jiang, Houfeng
    Jia, Ru
    Aiyiti, Wurikaixi
    Aihemaiti, Patiguli
    Kasimu, Ayiguli
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2023, 92 : 338 - 349
  • [26] Determining the effect of porosities on the hydrogen adsorption capacity of 3D printed PEEK
    Tabrizi, Arvin Taghizadeh
    Aghajani, Hossein
    Mashtizadeh, Amirreza
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2024, 49 : 1009 - 1019
  • [27] Influence of sanding and plasma treatment on shear bond strength of 3D-printed PEI, PEEK and PEEK/CF
    Li, Weijie
    Sang, Lin
    Jian, Xigao
    Wang, Jinyan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADHESION AND ADHESIVES, 2020, 100
  • [28] Effect of 3D printing process parameters on surface and mechanical properties of FFF-printed PEEK
    Pulipaka, Aditya
    Gide, Kunal Manoj
    Beheshti, Ali
    Bagheri, Z. Shaghayegh
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2023, 85 : 368 - 386
  • [29] Electroosmotic flow in fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D-printed microchannels
    Barbosa, Fabio Henrique Barros
    Quero, Reverson Fernandes
    Rocha, Kionnys Novaes
    Costa, Samuel Carvalho
    de Jesus, Dosil Pereira
    ELECTROPHORESIS, 2023, 44 (5-6) : 558 - 562
  • [30] Sterility of 3D-Printed Orthopedic Implants Using Fused Deposition Modeling
    Skelley, Nathan W.
    Hagerty, Michael P.
    Stannard, James T.
    Feltz, Kevin P.
    Ma, Richard
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2020, 43 (01) : 46 - 51