Corporate social responsibility: A review of the top 100 US retailers

被引:40
|
作者
Lee M.-Y. [1 ]
Fairhurst A. [2 ]
Wesley S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Merchandising, Apparel, and Textiles, University of Kentucky, Lexington
[2] Department of Retail, Hospitality, and Tourism Management, University of Tennesseect, Knoxville
关键词
Content analysis; Corporate social responsibility; Corporate website; Top; 100; retailers;
D O I
10.1057/crr.2009.10
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study is motivated by the lack of information about the retail industry's commitment to and attention given to socially responsible behaviors. The purpose of the study is to discover in what context corporate social responsibility (CSR) is being addressed within the top 100 US retail organizations. The framework of the study consists of principles of CSR, processes of CSR and outcomes of CSR. Based on this, corporate web pages were reviewed using content analysis procedure. Just over one-half of 100 US retailers mentioned CSR principles either in separate statements or embedded in mission statements. Economic statements were most common to category killers whereas discount stores predominantly mentioned philanthropic statements. In the analysis of CSR programs, social programs followed by environmental programs were most frequently mentioned. The results suggest more retail firms should be involved in communicating their social responsibility beliefs on their corporate website although previous research showed that a majority of Fortune 500 companies used their website to promote some aspects of CSR. © 2009 Palgrave Macmillan.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 158
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Communicating corporate social responsibility on the internet - A case study of the top 100 information technology companies in India
    Chaudhri, Vidhi
    Wang, Jian
    MANAGEMENT COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY, 2007, 21 (02) : 232 - 247
  • [22] The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility Practices on Brand Equity: An Examination of Malaysia's Top 100 Brands
    Zahari, Abdul Rahman
    Esa, Elinda
    Rajadurai, Jegatheesan
    Azizan, Noor Azlinna
    Muhamad Tamyez, Puteri Fadzline
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN FINANCE ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2020, 7 (02): : 271 - 280
  • [23] 40% of top 100 firms slow in social responsibility
    黄群慧
    彭华岗
    钟宏武
    张蒽
    China Economist, 2010, (03) : 100 - 110
  • [24] Corporate Social Responsibility: An Empirical Investigation of US Organizations
    Lindgreen, Adam
    Swaen, Valerie
    Johnston, Wesley J.
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2009, 85 : 303 - 323
  • [25] A Textual Analysis of US Corporate Social Responsibility Reports
    Clarkson, Peter M.
    Ponn, Jordan
    Richardson, Gordon D.
    Rudzicz, Frank
    Tsang, Albert
    Wang, Jingjing
    ABACUS-A JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING FINANCE AND BUSINESS STUDIES, 2020, 56 (01): : 3 - 34
  • [26] Corporate Social Responsibility, Efficiency, and Risk in US Banking
    Jouini, Fathi
    Chouchen, Mohamed Amine
    Messai, Ahlem Selma
    RISKS, 2025, 13 (01)
  • [27] Top Managers' Rice Culture and Corporate Social Responsibility Performance
    Luo, Yonggen
    Kong, Dongmin
    Cui, Huijie
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2024, 194 (03) : 655 - 678
  • [28] Corporate hypocrisy in the context of corporate social responsibility: a literature review
    Pacheco-Ortiz, Diana
    Escobar-Sierra, Manuela
    Suarez-Monsalve, Ana-Maria
    SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY JOURNAL, 2024, 20 (08) : 1576 - 1596
  • [29] A Review of Corporate Social Responsibility in Accounting Studies
    Feng Fan
    Wang Shixuan
    Gao Jie
    Sun Wei
    2018 15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SERVICE SYSTEMS AND SERVICE MANAGEMENT (ICSSSM), 2018,
  • [30] CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY: A MICROECONOMIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
    Schmitz, Jan
    Schrader, Jan
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS, 2015, 29 (01) : 27 - 45