A European strategic “third way?” The European Union between the traditional transatlantic alliance and the pull of the Chinese market

被引:0
|
作者
Casarini N. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Istituto Affari Internazionali, Rome
[2] Wilson Center, Washington, DC
关键词
China; European Union; Strategic autonomy; Trade and investment; United States;
D O I
10.1007/s42533-022-00095-1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The European Union (EU), China, and the United States (US) are the three major powers in the world today, and the three have a special relationship of cooperation and competition. The Biden administration has reached out to European allies to create a common front to counter Beijing. While the EU’s China policy has hardened in recent times and increasingly resembles that of Washington, the EU has never confronted Beijing the way the US does. Europe does not want to have to choose between America and China, preferring a situation in which Brussels cooperates with Washington on issues of common concern related to Beijing while at the same time seeking closer commercial ties with China so as to support Europe’s export-driven economy. The eventual ratification of the EU-China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI), a deal—currently frozen—announced on 30 December 2020, before the inauguration of the new Biden administration, could be a litmus test for EU efforts at finding a “third way” between the US and China, giving meaning and content to Europe’s aspirations for “strategic autonomy.” © 2022, The Institute of International and Strategic Studies (IISS), Peking University.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 107
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The political importance of energy cooperation between Germany and Denmark on the European Union energy market
    Ruszel, Mariusz
    1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE SUSTAINABLE ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT (SEED 2016), 2016, 10
  • [42] BREXIT AND THE "NEW" TRANSATLANTIC RELATIONS: POTENTIAL REFLECTIONS ON THE STRATEGIC RE-POSITIONING AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMMON SECURITY AND DEFENCE POLICY OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
    Smajic, Mirza
    Kadic, Veldin
    POLITICKE VEDY, 2020, 23 (02): : 200 - 218
  • [43] RETRACTED: Equal treatment in agreements concluded between European Union and third countries (Retracted Article)
    Liakopoulos, Dimitris
    RATIO JURIS, 2020, 15 (30) : 139 - 162
  • [44] Quality standard of traditional Chinese medicines: comparison between European Pharmacopoeia and Chinese Pharmacopoeia and recent advances
    Fong Leong
    Xue Hua
    Mei Wang
    Tongkai Chen
    Yuelin Song
    Pengfei Tu
    Xiao-Jia Chen
    Chinese Medicine, 15
  • [45] Quality standard of traditional Chinese medicines: comparison between European Pharmacopoeia and Chinese Pharmacopoeia and recent advances
    Leong, Fong
    Hua, Xue
    Wang, Mei
    Chen, Tongkai
    Song, Yuelin
    Tu, Pengfei
    Chen, Xiao-Jia
    CHINESE MEDICINE, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [46] Whose Silk Road? The Chinese, US, European Union and Russian strategic projects for regional integration in Central Asia
    Duarte, Paulo
    CHINA'S NEW SILK ROAD: AN EMERGING WORLD ORDER, 2019, : 38 - 50
  • [47] The Transatlantic Agreement for Trade and Investment (TTIP): origins, motivations and potential impacts on relations between the United States and the European Union
    Vega Canovas, Gustavo
    Campos Ortiz, Francisco
    FORO INTERNACIONAL, 2016, 56 (04) : 805 - 850
  • [48] Electricity security in the European Union-The conflict between national Capacity Mechanisms and the Single Market
    Hawker, Graeme
    Bell, Keith
    Gill, Simon
    ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2017, 24 : 51 - 58
  • [49] GIS analysis of intermodal transport between morocco and the european union. An assessment of routes and strategic enclaves
    Moreno Navarro, Jesus Gabriel
    CUADERNOS GEOGRAFICOS, 2006, 39 (02): : 203 - 219
  • [50] THE REPORTING BY THE SPUTNIK NEWS AGENCY AND THE RESPONSE TO IT IN THE CONTEXT OF STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION BETWEEN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION AND THE EUROPEAN UNION
    Malesic, Marjan
    TEORIJA IN PRAKSA, 2020, 57 (01): : 189 - 209