A Systematic Review of Parent–Child Communication Measures: Instruments and Their Psychometric Properties

被引:0
|
作者
Holger Zapf
Johannes Boettcher
Yngvild Haukeland
Stian Orm
Sarah Coslar
Silke Wiegand-Grefe
Krister Fjermestad
机构
[1] University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
[2] University of Oslo,Department of Psychology
[3] Innlandet Hospital Trust,Division Mental Health Care
[4] University of Groningen,Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences
关键词
Parent–child communication; Adolescents; Parents; Systematic review;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Parent–child communication represents an important variable in clinical child and family psychology due to its association with a variety of psychosocial outcomes. To give an overview of instruments designed to measure the quality of parent–child communication from the child’s (8–21 years) perspective and to assess the psychometric quality of these instruments, we performed a systematic literature search in Medline and PsycInfo (last: February 25, 2022). Peer-reviewed journal articles published in English with a child-rated instrument measuring the quality of parent–child communication were included. Initial screening for eligibility and inclusion, subsequent data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted by couples of review team members. Based on the screening of 5115 articles, 106 studies reported in 126 papers were included. We identified 12 parent–child communication instruments across the studies. The Parent-Adolescent Communication Scale (PACS) was used in 75% of the studies. On average, the evidence for psychometric quality of the instruments was low. Few instruments were used in clinical and at-risk samples. Several instruments are available to rate parent–child communication from the child’s perspective. However, their psychometric evidence is limited and the theoretical foundation is largely undocumented. This review has limitations with regard to selection criteria and language bias.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 142
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Psychometric Properties of Frailty Instruments in Adults With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review
    Loecker, Courtney N.
    Schmaderer, Myra S.
    Wysham, Katherine D.
    Pozehl, Bunny
    Zimmerman, Lani
    England, Bryant R.
    ACR OPEN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2024, 6 (02) : 91 - 102
  • [32] The suffering measurement instruments in palliative care: A systematic review of psychometric properties
    Gutierrez-Sanchez, Daniel
    Gomez-Garcia, Rafael
    Cuesta-Vargas, Antonio, I
    Perez-Cruzado, David
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2020, 110
  • [33] The psychometric properties of instruments measuring ethical sensitivity in nursing: a systematic review
    Zhou, Lu
    Bi, LiXiong
    Wu, YuMing
    Wang, Lei
    Liu, Gao
    Cai, EnLi
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2024, 13 (01)
  • [34] Instruments used to measure dating violence: A systematic review of psychometric properties
    Tarrino-Concejero, Lorena
    Gil-Garcia, Eugenia
    Barrientos-Trigo, Sergio
    Garcia-Carpintero-Munoz, Maria de los angeles
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2023, 79 (04) : 1267 - 1289
  • [35] Psychometric Properties of Instruments That Measure Vaping Outcome Expectancies: A Systematic Review
    Wall, Nicole
    Fox-Wasylyshyn, Susan
    Mirza, Noeman
    Ralph, Jody
    NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH, 2024, 26 (08) : 966 - 975
  • [36] A systematic review of the psychometric properties of measures that assess preparation for parenthood
    Spiteri, Georgette
    Xuereb, Rita Borg
    Carrick-Sen, Debbie
    Kaner, Eileen
    Martin, Colin R.
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE AND INFANT PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 32 (03) : E14 - E14
  • [37] Systematic review of the psychometric properties of balance measures for cerebellar ataxia
    Winser, Stanley J.
    Smith, Catherine M.
    Hale, Leigh A.
    Claydon, Leica S.
    Whitney, Susan L.
    Mehta, Poonam
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2015, 29 (01) : 69 - 79
  • [38] A systematic review evaluating the psychometric properties of measures of social inclusion
    Cordier, Reinie
    Milbourn, Ben
    Martin, Robyn
    Buchanan, Angus
    Chung, Donna
    Speyer, Renee
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (06):
  • [39] Psychometric Properties of Heavy Work Investment Measures: A Systematic Review
    Acosta-Prado, Julio Cesar
    Tafur-Mendoza, Arnold Alejandro
    Zarate-Torres, Rodrigo Arturo
    Ramirez-Ospina, Duvan Emilio
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (22)
  • [40] Behavioral measures of state impulsivity and their psychometric properties: A systematic review
    Nguyen, Rebecca
    Brooks, Michael
    Bruno, Raimondo
    Peacock, Amy
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2018, 135 : 67 - 79