Modeling algorithmic bias: simplicial complexes and evolving network topologies

被引:0
|
作者
Valentina Pansanella
Giulio Rossetti
Letizia Milli
机构
[1] Scuola Normale Superiore,Faculty of Science
[2] National Research Council (CNR),Institute of Information Science and Technologies “Alessandro Faedo” (ISTI)
[3] University of Pisa,Department of Computer Science
来源
Applied Network Science | / 7卷
关键词
Opinion dynamics; Complex networks; Algorithmic bias;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Every day, people inform themselves and create their opinions on social networks. Although these platforms have promoted the access and dissemination of information, they may expose readers to manipulative, biased, and disinformative content—co-causes of polarization/radicalization. Moreover, recommendation algorithms, intended initially to enhance platform usage, are likely to augment such phenomena, generating the so-called Algorithmic Bias. In this work, we propose two extensions of the Algorithmic Bias model and analyze them on scale-free and Erdős–Rényi random network topologies. Our first extension introduces a mechanism of link rewiring so that the underlying structure co-evolves with the opinion dynamics, generating the Adaptive Algorithmic Bias model. The second one explicitly models a peer-pressure mechanism where a majority—if there is one—can attract a disagreeing individual, pushing them to conform. As a result, we observe that the co-evolution of opinions and network structure does not significantly impact the final state when the latter is much slower than the former. On the other hand, peer pressure enhances consensus mitigating the effects of both “close-mindedness” and algorithmic filtering.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Artificial intelligence and algorithmic bias? Field tests on social network with teens
    Cecere, G.
    Jean, C.
    Le Guel, F.
    Manant, M.
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2024, 201
  • [22] Effect of algorithmic bias and network structure on coexistence, consensus, and polarization of opinions
    Peralta, Antonio F.
    Neri, Matteo
    Kertesz, Janos
    Iniguez, Gerardo
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2021, 104 (04)
  • [23] Evolving Scale-Free Topologies using a Gene Regulatory Network Model
    Nicolau, Miguel
    Schoenauer, Marc
    2008 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, VOLS 1-8, 2008, : 3747 - 3754
  • [24] Generalized network structures: The configuration model and the canonical ensemble of simplicial complexes
    Courtney, Owen T.
    Bianconi, Ginestra
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2016, 93 (06)
  • [25] Comparative modeling of network topologies and routing strategies in multicomputers
    Mackenzie, L
    Ould-Khaoua, M
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING APPLICATIONS, 2000, 14 (03): : 252 - 267
  • [26] Experiences with Modeling Network Topologies at Multiple Levels of Abstraction
    Mogul, Jeffrey C.
    Goricanec, Drago
    Pool, Martin
    Shaikh, Anees
    Turk, Douglas
    Koley, Bikash
    Zhao, Xiaoxue
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 17TH USENIX SYMPOSIUM ON NETWORKED SYSTEMS DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION, 2020, : 403 - 418
  • [27] Modeling of Evolving Knowledge Network with Node Deletion
    Shan, Hai-yan
    Wang, Wen-ping
    WKDD: 2009 SECOND INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 219 - 222
  • [28] Evolving geometries, topologies, and apertures in fracture networks: Quantitative insights from lattice modeling
    Mathur, Bakul
    Prabhakaran, Rahul
    Koehn, Daniel
    FORCES IN MECHANICS, 2023, 12
  • [29] Centrality measures in simplicial complexes: Applications of topological data analysis to network science
    Hernandez Serrano, Daniel
    Sanchez Gomez, Dario
    APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 2020, 382
  • [30] EVOLVING SPIKING NEURAL NETWORK TOPOLOGIES FOR BREAST CANCER CLASSIFICATION IN A DIELECTRICALLY HETEROGENEOUS BREAST
    O'Halloran, M.
    Cawley, S.
    McGinley, B.
    Conceicao, R. C.
    Morgan, F.
    Jones, E.
    Glavin, M.
    PROGRESS IN ELECTROMAGNETICS RESEARCH LETTERS, 2011, 25 : 153 - 162