Information sharing and strategic signaling in supply chains

被引:0
|
作者
Robert J. Kauffman
Hamid Mohtadi
机构
[1] Arizona State University Tempe,W. P. Carey School of Business, and School of Computing and Informatics
[2] University of Wisconsin,Department of Economics
[3] Credit Risk Assessment,undefined
[4] USBank,undefined
关键词
Anticipated over-supply; collaborative planning; forecasting and replenishment (CPFR); demand forecasting; economic analysis; information sharing; information systems (IS); signaling; supply chain management;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Information sharing in procurement occurs in rich and varied industry contexts in which managerial decisions are made and organizational strategy is formulated. We explore how information sharing ought to work in procurement contexts that involve investments in inter-organizational information systems (IOS) and collaborative planning, forecasting and replenishment (CPFR) practices. How and under what circumstances does a firm that plays the role of a supply chain buyer decide to share information on key variables, such as point-of-sale consumer demand data with its supplier, up the supply chain? This is a key issue that crosses the boundary between supply chain management and information systems (IS) management. The answers that we provide are based on our use of a game-theoretic signaling model of buyer and supplier strategy in the presence of uncertainties about final consumer demand. We also explore the connection between operational costs that are associated with the firm’s information sharing and information withholding strategies. Our results provide normative guidance to supply chain buyers about how to interpret different demand uncertainty scenarios to improve their decisions and generate high value. From the IS management perspective, we show the impacts on the firm of different information sharing approaches that are made possible by present day technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 158
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparative analysis on value of information sharing in supply chains
    Li, G
    Yan, H
    Wang, SY
    Xia, YS
    SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2005, 10 (01) : 34 - 46
  • [42] An information sharing theory perspective on willingness to share information in supply chains
    Zaheer, Nadia
    Trkman, Peter
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2017, 28 (02) : 417 - 443
  • [43] Information sharing under different warranty policies with cost sharing in supply chains
    Cai, Keyuan
    He, Shuguang
    He, Zhen
    INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS IN OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (03) : 1550 - 1572
  • [44] Strategic Orientation towards Information Sharing in Supply Chain Management
    Ho, Chin-Fu
    Hung, Wei-Hsi
    Jou, Jau-Jeng
    Tai, Yi-Ming
    Kung, Kao-Hui
    ICOSCM 2009 - PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OPERATIONS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 2009, 3 : 55 - 62
  • [45] The beneficial impact of information sharing on the Bullwhip effect in supply chains
    Zhou, Lixia
    Hu, Dali
    2008 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, NETWORKING AND MOBILE COMPUTING, VOLS 1-31, 2008, : 6389 - +
  • [46] Public Forecast Information Sharing in a Market with Competing Supply Chains
    Shamir, Noam
    Shin, Hyoduk
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2016, 62 (10) : 2994 - 3022
  • [47] Information sharing versus order aggregation strategies in supply chains
    Schmidt, Roman
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2009, 20 (06) : 804 - 816
  • [48] Information sharing in supply chains from the market game perspective
    Feng, Yinbo
    Li, Jiamin
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2025,
  • [49] Innovation information sharing between two competitive supply chains
    Xu, Hongyan
    Liu, Xiaomin
    Huang, He
    Zhou, Yu
    Ying Wei
    INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS IN OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (01) : 471 - 495
  • [50] A refined framework of information sharing in perishable product supply chains
    Lusiantoro, Luluk
    Yates, Nicola
    Mena, Carlos
    Varga, Liz
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL DISTRIBUTION & LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2018, 48 (03) : 254 - 283