Generalization and similarity in exemplar models of categorization: Insights from machine learning

被引:0
|
作者
Frank Jäkel
Bernhard Schölkopf
Felix A. Wichmann
机构
[1] Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience,
[2] Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics,undefined
[3] Technische Universität Berlin,undefined
来源
关键词
Machine Learning; Category Structure; Kernel Method; Decision Boundary; Generalization Performance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Exemplar theories of categorization depend on similarity for explaining subjects’ ability to generalize to new stimuli. A major criticism of exemplar theories concerns their lack of abstraction mechanisms and thus, seemingly, of generalization ability. Here, we use insights from machine learning to demonstrate that exemplar models can actually generalize very well. Kernel methods in machine learning are akin to exemplar models and are very successful in real-world applications. Their generalization performance depends crucially on the chosen similarity measure. Although similarity plays an important role in describing generalization behavior, it is not the only factor that controls generalization performance. In machine learning, kernel methods are often combined with regularization techniques in order to ensure good generalization. These same techniques are easily incorporated in exemplar models. We show that the generalized context model (Nosofsky, 1986) and ALCOVE (Kruschke, 1992) are closely related to a statistical model called kernel logistic regression. We argue that generalization is central to the enterprise of understanding categorization behavior, and we suggest some ways in which insights from machine learning can offer guidance.
引用
收藏
页码:256 / 271
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] EXEMPLAR MODELS AND WEIGHTED CUE MODELS IN CATEGORY LEARNING
    TARABAN, R
    PALACIOS, JM
    CATEGORIZATION BY HUMANS AND MACHINES, 1993, 29 : 91 - 127
  • [32] Structural Similarity, Activity, and Toxicity of Mycotoxins: Combining Insights from Unsupervised and Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms
    Cova, Tânia F.
    Ferreira, Cláudia
    Nunes, Sandra C. C.
    Pais, Alberto A. C. C.
    Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 1600, American Chemical Society
  • [33] Structural Similarity, Activity, and Toxicity of Mycotoxins: Combining Insights from Unsupervised and Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms
    Cova, Tania F.
    Ferreira, Claudia
    Nunes, Sandra C. C.
    Pais, Alberto A. C. C.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2025, 73 (10) : 6173 - 6188
  • [34] MODELS OF CATEGORIZATION AND CATEGORY LEARNING
    ESTES, WK
    CATEGORIZATION BY HUMANS AND MACHINES, 1993, 29 : 15 - 56
  • [35] Learning compositional categorization models
    Ommer, B
    Buhmann, JM
    COMPUTER VISION - ECCV 2006, PT 3, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 3953 : 316 - 329
  • [36] Machine learning in automated text categorization
    Sebastiani, F
    ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS, 2002, 34 (01) : 1 - 47
  • [37] Approach for the Optimization of Machine Learning Models for Calculating Binary Function Similarity
    Horimoto, Suguru
    Lucas, Keane
    Bauer, Lujo
    DETECTION OF INTRUSIONS AND MALWARE, AND VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT, DIMVA 2024, 2024, 14828 : 309 - 329
  • [38] Machine learning models: Combining evidence of similarity for XML schema matching
    Hong-Minh, Tran
    Smith, Dan
    KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY FROM XML DOCUMENTS, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 3915 : 43 - 53
  • [39] What drives stock returns across countries? Insights from machine learning models
    Cakici, Nusret
    Zaremba, Adam
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 96
  • [40] Distinguishing rule- and exemplar-based generalization in learning systems
    Dasgupta, Ishita
    Grant, Erin
    Griffiths, Thomas L.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING, VOL 162, 2022,