Simulation of biomass gasification in a dual fluidized bed gasifier

被引:28
|
作者
He J. [1 ]
Göransson K. [1 ]
Söderlind U. [1 ]
Zhang W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Natural Sciences, Engineering and Mathematics, Mid Sweden University, Härnösand
[2] Department of Natural Sciences, Engineering and Mathematics, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall
关键词
Biomass; Gasification; Simulation; Tar;
D O I
10.1007/s13399-011-0030-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Biomass gasification with steam in a dual-fluidized bed gasifier (DFBG) was simulated with ASPEN Plus. From the model, the yield and composition of the syngas and the contents of tar and char can be calculated. The model has been evaluated against the experimental results measured on a 150 KWth Mid Sweden University (MIUN) DFBG. The model predicts that the content of char transferred from the gasifier to the combustor decreases from 22. 5 wt.% of the dry and ash-free biomass at gasification temperature 750°C to 11. 5 wt.% at 950°C, but is insensitive to the mass ratio of steam to biomass (S/B). The H2 concentration is higher than that of CO under the normal DFBG operation conditions, but they will change positions when the gasification temperature is too high above about 950°C, or the S/B ratio is too low under about 0. 15. The biomass moisture content is a key parameter for a DFBG to be operated and maintained at a high gasification temperature. The model suggests that the gasification temperature is difficult to be kept above 850°C when the biomass moisture content is higher than 15. 0 wt.%. Thus, a certain amount of biomass needs to be added in the combustor to provide sufficient heat for biomass devolatilization and steam reforming. Tar content in the syngas can also be predicted from the model, which shows a decreasing trend of the tar with the gasification temperature and the S/B ratio. The tar content in the syngas decreases significantly with gasification residence time which is a key parameter. © 2012 Springer-Verlag.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Combined-gasification of biomass and municipal solid waste in a fluidized bed gasifier
    Cao, Yan
    Fu, Leijie
    Mofrad, Amir
    JOURNAL OF THE ENERGY INSTITUTE, 2019, 92 (06) : 1683 - 1688
  • [32] Aspen plus simulation of heavy oil gasification in a fluidized bed gasifier
    Yang, Xiuying
    Hamidzadeh, Amir
    Ilkhani, Mohammad
    Foroughi, Amin
    Esfahani, Mohammad Javad
    Motahari-Nezhad, Mohsen
    PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 34 (17-18) : 1530 - 1533
  • [33] Numerical simulation of biomass gasification in fluidized bed gasifiers
    Yang, Miao
    Mousavi, Seyed Morteza
    Fatehi, Hesammedin
    Bai, Xue-Song
    FUEL, 2023, 337
  • [34] Co-gasification of Plastics and Biomass in a Dual Fluidized-Bed Steam Gasifier: Possible Interactions of Fuels
    Wilk, Veronika
    Hofbauer, Hermann
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2013, 27 (06) : 3261 - 3273
  • [35] Gasification of wastes in a pilot fluidized bed gasifier
    Campoy, Manuel
    Gomez-Barea, Alberto
    Ollero, Pedro
    Nilsson, Susanna
    FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 121 : 63 - 69
  • [36] Characterization of a dual fluidized bed gasifier with blended biomass/coal as feedstock
    Yan, Linbo
    Cao, Yang
    Li, Xuezheng
    He, Boshu
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 254 : 97 - 106
  • [37] Air gasification of rice husk in a dual distributor type fluidized bed gasifier
    Mansaray, KG
    Ghaly, AE
    Al-Taweel, AM
    Hamdullahpur, F
    Ugursal, VI
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 1999, 17 (04): : 315 - 332
  • [38] CFD simulation with experiments in a dual circulating fluidized bed gasifier
    Nguyen, Thanh D. B.
    Seo, Myung Won
    Lim, Young-Il
    Song, Byung-Ho
    Kim, Sang-Done
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 36 : 48 - 56
  • [39] Influence of fuel particle size on gasification in a dual fluidized bed steam gasifier
    Wilk, V.
    Hofbauer, H.
    FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 115 : 139 - 151
  • [40] Steam gasification of biomass in dual fluidized bed gasifiers: A review
    Karl, Juergen
    Proell, Tobias
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 98 : 64 - 78