MRI-based radiomics in breast cancer: feature robustness with respect to inter-observer segmentation variability

被引:0
|
作者
R. W. Y. Granzier
N. M. H. Verbakel
A. Ibrahim
J. E. van Timmeren
T. J. A. van Nijnatten
R. T. H. Leijenaar
M. B. I. Lobbes
M. L. Smidt
H. C. Woodruff
机构
[1] Maastricht University Medical Center+,Department of Surgery
[2] Maastricht University,GROW – School for Oncology and Developmental Biology
[3] Maastricht University Medical Center+,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
[4] Maastricht University,The D
[5] Hospital Center Universitaire De Liege,Lab, Department of Precision Medicine
[6] University Hospital RWTH Aachen University,Division of Nuclear Medicine and Oncological Imaging, Department of Medical Physics
[7] Zuyderland Medical Center,Department of Nuclear Medicine and Comprehensive Diagnostic Center Aachen (CDCA)
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Radiomics is an emerging field using the extraction of quantitative features from medical images for tissue characterization. While MRI-based radiomics is still at an early stage, it showed some promising results in studies focusing on breast cancer patients in improving diagnoses and therapy response assessment. Nevertheless, the use of radiomics raises a number of issues regarding feature quantification and robustness. Therefore, our study aim was to determine the robustness of radiomics features extracted by two commonly used radiomics software with respect to variability in manual breast tumor segmentation on MRI. A total of 129 histologically confirmed breast tumors were segmented manually in three dimensions on the first post-contrast T1-weighted MR exam by four observers: a dedicated breast radiologist, a resident, a Ph.D. candidate, and a medical student. Robust features were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC > 0.9). The inter-observer variability was evaluated by the volumetric Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC). The mean DSC for all tumors was 0.81 (range 0.19–0.96), indicating a good spatial overlap of the segmentations based on observers of varying expertise. In total, 41.6% (552/1328) and 32.8% (273/833) of all RadiomiX and Pyradiomics features, respectively, were identified as robust and were independent of inter-observer manual segmentation variability.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Inter-observer variability in contouring of the tumor bed in breast cancer patients with and without clips
    Dicuonzo, S.
    Ciardo, D.
    Leonardi, M. C.
    Jereczek-Fossa, B. A.
    Morra, A.
    Dell'Acqua, V.
    Cattani, F.
    Cambria, R.
    Baroni, G.
    Orecchia, R.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 : S316 - S316
  • [22] Estimating a Delineation Uncertainty Margin to Account for Inter-observer Variability in Breast Cancer Radiotherapy
    Holloway, L. C.
    Jameson, M. G.
    Batumalai, V.
    Koh, E.
    Papadatos, G.
    Lonergan, D.
    Delaney, G. P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 78 (03): : S741 - S741
  • [23] An MRI-based Radiomics Approach to Improve Breast Cancer Histological Grading
    Jiang, Meng
    Li, Chang-Li
    Luo, Xiao-Mao
    Chuan, Zhi-Rui
    Chen, Rui-Xue
    Jin, Chao-Ying
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2023, 30 (09) : 1794 - 1804
  • [24] Inter-observer variation of image registration in an MR-only versus CT/MRI-based workflow
    Boon, M. A.
    Visser, J.
    Beeksma, F.
    Goedhart, A. A.
    Bijveld, M. M. C.
    Hinnen, K. A.
    Goudschaal, K. N.
    Van Kesteren, Z.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S186 - S187
  • [25] Inter-observer variability in Gleason grading of prostate cancer biopsies
    Salmo, E.
    Thampy, S.
    Coyne, J.
    Yousif, M.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2020, 477 : S168 - S168
  • [26] INTER-OBSERVER VARIABILITY OF GTV DELINEATION BASED ON LUNG MRI: IMPACT OF RADIOLOGIST LED WORKSHOP
    Kumar, Shivani
    Holloway, Lois C.
    Moses, Daniel
    Vinod, Shalini
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2013, 8 : S533 - S533
  • [27] PET segmentation of bulky tumors: Strategies and workflows to improve inter-observer variability
    Pfaehler, Elisabeth
    Burggraaff, Coreline
    Kramer, Gem
    Zijlstra, Josee
    Hoekstra, Otto S.
    Jalving, Mathilde
    Noordzij, Walter
    Brouwers, Adrienne H.
    Stevenson, Marc G.
    de Jong, Johan
    Boellaard, Ronald
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (03):
  • [28] On the Effect of Inter-observer Variability for a Reliable Estimation of Uncertainty of Medical Image Segmentation
    Jungo, Alain
    Meier, Raphael
    Ermis, Ekin
    Blatti-Moreno, Marcela
    Herrmann, Evelyn
    Wiest, Roland
    Reyes, Mauricio
    MEDICAL IMAGE COMPUTING AND COMPUTER ASSISTED INTERVENTION - MICCAI 2018, PT I, 2018, 11070 : 682 - 690
  • [29] Evaluation of multiple auto-segmentation solutions against inter-observer variability
    Roussakis, Y.
    McWilliam, A.
    Hartley, A.
    Sangera, P.
    Benghiat, H.
    Hickman, M.
    Meade, S.
    Zarkar, A.
    Dehghani, H.
    Green, S.
    Webster, G.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2015, 115 : S485 - S486
  • [30] Advances in MRI-Based Radiomics for Prostate Cancer
    Chaddad, Ahmad
    Katib, Yousef
    Tanougast, Camel
    2023 IEEE 20TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL IMAGING, ISBI, 2023,