Choose uniform random points X1,⋯,Xn\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
\begin{document}$$X_1, \dots , X_n$$\end{document} in a given convex set and let conv[X1,⋯,Xn]\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
\begin{document}$${\text { conv}}[X_1, \dots , X_n]$$\end{document} be their convex hull. It is shown that in dimension three the expected volume of this convex hull is in general not monotone with respect to set inclusion. This answers a question by Meckes in the negative. The given counterexample is formed by uniformly distributed points in the three-dimensional tetrahedron together with a small perturbation of it. As side result we obtain an explicit formula for all even moments of the volume of a random simplex which is the convex hull of three uniform random points in the tetrahedron and the center of one facet.