Automatic prediction of flexible regions improves the accuracy of protein-protein docking models

被引:0
|
作者
Xiaohu Luo
Qiang Lü
Hongjie Wu
Lingyun Yang
Xu Huang
Peide Qian
Gang Fu
机构
[1] Soochow University,School of Computer Science and Technology
[2] Jiangsu Provincial Key Lab for Information Processing Technologies,School of Computer Science and Technology
[3] Soochow University,undefined
[4] Google New York,undefined
来源
Journal of Molecular Modeling | 2012年 / 18卷
关键词
Protein-protein docking; Backbone flexibility; Flexible hinge; Domain assembly;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Computational models of protein-protein docking that incorporate backbone flexibility can predict perturbations of the backbone and side chains during docking and produce protein interaction models with atomic accuracy. Most previous models usually predefine flexible regions by visually comparing the bound and unbound structures. In this paper, we propose a general method to automatically identify the flexible hinges for domain assembly and the flexible loops for loop refinement, in addition to predicting the corresponding movements of the identified active residues. We conduct experiments to evaluate performance of our approach on two test sets. Comparison of results on test set I between algorithms with and without prediction of flexible regions demonstrate the superior recovery of energy funnels in many target interactions using the new loop refinement model. In addition, our decoys are superior for each target. Indeed, the total number of satisfactory models is almost double that of other programs. The results on test set II docking tests produced by our domain assembly method also show encouraging results. Of the three targets examined, one exhibits energy funnel and the best models of the other two targets all meet the conditions of acceptable accuracy. Results demonstrate that the automatic prediction of flexible backbone regions can greatly improve the performance of protein-protein docking models.
引用
收藏
页码:2199 / 2208
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Flexible protein-protein docking with a multitrack iterative transformer
    Chu, Lee-Shin
    Ruffolo, Jeffrey A.
    Harmalkar, Ameya
    Gray, Jeffrey J.
    PROTEIN SCIENCE, 2024, 33 (02)
  • [12] Protein docking prediction using predicted protein-protein interface
    Li, Bin
    Kihara, Daisuke
    BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2012, 13
  • [13] Protein docking prediction using predicted protein-protein interface
    Bin Li
    Daisuke Kihara
    BMC Bioinformatics, 13
  • [14] Combination of scoring functions improves discrimination in protein-protein docking
    Murphy, J
    Gatchell, DW
    Prasad, JC
    Vajda, S
    PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND GENETICS, 2003, 53 (04): : 840 - 854
  • [15] Pushing the accuracy limit of shape complementarity for protein-protein docking
    Yumeng Yan
    Sheng-You Huang
    BMC Bioinformatics, 20
  • [16] Pushing the accuracy limit of shape complementarity for protein-protein docking
    Yan, Yumeng
    Huang, Sheng-You
    BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2019, 20 (01)
  • [17] DockQ: A Quality Measure for Protein-Protein Docking Models
    Basu, Sankar
    Wallner, Bjorn
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (08):
  • [18] A random forest classifier for protein-protein docking models
    Barradas-Bautista, Didier
    Cao, Zhen
    Vangone, Anna
    Oliva, Romina
    Cavallo, Luigi
    Gromiha, Michael
    BIOINFORMATICS ADVANCES, 2022, 2 (01):
  • [19] Efficient flexible backbone protein-protein docking for challenging targets
    Marze, Nicholas A.
    Burman, Shourya S. Roy
    Sheffler, William
    Gray, Jeffrey J.
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2018, 34 (20) : 3461 - 3469
  • [20] A Web Interface for Easy Flexible Protein-Protein Docking with ATTRACT
    de Vries, Sjoerd J.
    Schindler, Christina E. M.
    de Beauchene, Isaure Chauvot
    Zacharias, Martin
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 108 (03) : 462 - 465