BRAF mutation testing in melanoma: results from a German observational multicenter study

被引:0
|
作者
Arndt Hartmann
Peter Schirmacher
William Sterlacci
Winfried Koch
David B. Liesenfeld
Birgit Schif
Claus Garbe
机构
[1] University of Erlangen-Nüremberg,Institute of Pathology
[2] University Medicine Heidelberg,Institute of Pathology
[3] Klinikum Bayreuth,Institute of Pathology
[4] BDS Koch,Division of Dermato
[5] Roche Pharma AG,Oncology
[6] University-Department of Dermatology,undefined
来源
Virchows Archiv | 2019年 / 474卷
关键词
mutation; Melanoma; Quality control; Mutational analysis; Multiple logistic regression;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Quality control of BRAF mutation testing methods used in routine practice is crucial for optimal treatment selection. In this prospective study, we assessed the impact of patient/sample characteristics on BRAF mutation testing results in patients with melanoma, during clinical practice. Data were collected on routine testing practices and documented mutation status in patients with melanoma stages IIIB, IIIC, or IV across 28 diagnostic pathology centers in Germany. Patient/sample data collected included: patient age, location of primary melanoma and metastases, origin of sample, melanoma subtype, and quality of tissue. Statistical influence of patient/sample characteristics on BRAF mutation rate was assessed using multiple logistic regression analyses and statistical models developed to predict the probability of BRAF mutations for individual patient cohorts. Data/samples from 642 patients with melanoma were analyzed. BRAF mutations were documented in 241/642 patients (37.5%). The primary statistical model to predict BRAF mutation rates included: age (continuous), origin of sample, method of mutation analysis, and quality of tissue. Analyses of post hoc collected data identified major deviations between documented mutation rates included in this study vs. routinely recorded mutation rates for three centers. When samples from these centers were excluded, the influence of testing method was no longer statistically significant. The final model included patient age, origin of sample (including metastasis location), and quality of tissue. Once validated in an independent population, this type of model could allow pathology centers to compare the performance of their testing methods with what would be expected based on patient, tumor, and sample characteristics.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 78
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Preliminary Results from a Prospective Trial of Preoperative Combined BRAF and MEK-Targeted Therapy in Advanced BRAF Mutation-Positive Melanoma
    Johnson, Adam S.
    Crandall, Holly
    Dahlman, Kimberly
    Kelley, Mark C.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2015, 220 (04) : 581 - 593
  • [32] Psychological distress in German sarcoma patients-Results of an large, observational, multicenter Study (PROSa)
    Eichler, Martin
    Hentschel, Leopold
    Hornemann, Beate
    Richter, Stephan
    Singer, Susanne
    Hohenberger, Peter
    Kasper, Bernd
    Andreou, Dimosthenis
    Pink, Daniel
    Arndt, Karin
    Bornhaeuser, Martin
    Schmitt, Jochen
    Schuler, Markus K.
    ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2022, 45 (SUPPL 3) : 210 - 210
  • [33] Impact of BRAF mutation in patients with brain metastasis from melanoma.
    Venur, Vyshak Alva
    Kotecha, Rupesh
    Chen, Zhijian
    Chao, Samuel T.
    Elson, Paul
    Suh, John H.
    Ahluwalia, Manmeet Singh
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15)
  • [34] METASTATIC MELANOMA PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS AS A DETERMENING FACTOR FOR BRAF GENE MUTATION TESTING AND TREATMENT IN CANADA - A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY
    Djokic, S.
    Lapierre, M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (03) : A213 - A213
  • [35] BRAF MUTATION ANALYSIS IN CELL FREE TUMORAL DNA (CFDNA) OF MELANOMA PATIENTS: PRELIMINARY RESULTS FROM THE SPANISH MELANOMA GROUP PROSPECTIVE STUDY GEM1304
    Gonzalez-Cao, M.
    Soriano, V.
    Rodriguez, D.
    Puertolas, T.
    Munoz, E.
    Soria, A.
    Mayo de las Casas, C.
    Molina, M. A.
    Perez, E.
    Magem, M.
    Garcia, A.
    Manzano, J. L.
    Cortes, J.
    Rosell, R.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2014, 25
  • [36] Reflex Molecular Testing in Melanoma Diagnosis: When Should BRAF Mutation Testing Be Ordered and Who Should Order It?
    Zhou, Sarah
    Sivachandran, Sriraam
    Sikorski, Daniel
    Xu, Hong Hao
    Lagace, Francois
    Claveau, Joel
    Salopek, Thomas G.
    Gniadecki, Robert
    Litvinov, Ivan V.
    JOURNAL OF CUTANEOUS MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2022, 26 (02) : 201 - 202
  • [37] BRAF V600 mutation detection in melanoma: a comparison of two laboratory testing methods
    O'Brien, Odharnaith
    Lyons, Tomas
    Murphy, Sandra
    Feeley, Linda
    Power, Derek
    Heffron, Cynthia C. B. B.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2017, 70 (11) : 935 - 940
  • [38] COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS OF BRAF MUTATION TESTING FOR ELECTION OF ADJUVANT TREATMENT OF MELANOMA IN COLOMBIA
    Gil-Rojas, Y.
    Avendano, V
    Lasalvia, P.
    Castaneda-Cardona, C.
    Rosselli, D.
    Diaz-Ortega, M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2021, 24 : S36 - S36
  • [39] Comparison of different testing methods for detection of BRAF V600 mutation in metastatic melanoma
    Hernandez-Losa, J.
    Ruano, Y.
    Trigo Sanchez, I.
    Somoza, R.
    Ferrer, B.
    Garcia Verdes-Montenegro, F.
    Urech, M.
    Ramon Y Cajal, S.
    Rios Martin, J. J.
    Rodriguez-Peralto, J. L.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29
  • [40] Preliminary Results from a Prospective Trial of Preoperative Combined BRAF and MEK-Targeted Therapy in Advanced BRAF Mutation-Positive Melanoma Discussion
    Zager, Jonathan
    Tyler, Douglas
    Ollila, David
    Copeland, Edward M.
    McMasters, Kelly
    Kelley, Mark C.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2015, 220 (04) : 593 - 595