Reliability and Validity of the European Portuguese Version of the Social Touch Questionnaire

被引:0
|
作者
Ana Isabel Vieira
Ana Vanessa Ramos
Luís Manuel Cavalheiro
Patrícia Almeida
Dália Nogueira
Elisabeth Reis
Maria Vânia Nunes
Alexandre Castro-Caldas
机构
[1] Alcoitão School of Health Sciences,CEISUC
[2] University of Coimbra, Centre of Study and Research in Health
[3] ISCTE-University Institute of Lisbon,Business Research Unit
[4] Catholic University of Portugal,Institute of Health Sciences
来源
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior | 2016年 / 40卷
关键词
Social touch; Social anxiety; Social Touch Questionnaire; Cultural adaptation; Reliability; Validity; Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Social touch is essential for physical and emotional well-being. However, different meanings can be attributed to physical contact during social interactions and may generate bonding or avoidant behaviors. This personal and unique experience is not usually taken into account in health and social care services. The aim of this study is to produce a valid and reliable European Portuguese version of the Social Touch Questionnaire (STQ, Wilhelm et al. in Biol Psychol 58:181–202, 2001. doi:10.1016/S0301-0511(01)00113-2). The STQ is a self-report questionnaire for adolescents and adults measuring behaviors and attitudes towards social touch. The original version was translated into European Portuguese using a forward-back translation process and its feasibility was examined. To evaluate the psychometric properties, a total of 242 Portuguese university students participated in the study (21.3 ± 3.8 years). The STQ was considered feasible, showed adequate internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = .734), and the test–retest correlation with the STQ items demonstrated a high concordance between the tests over a two-week interval (ICC = .990; n = 50). Validity tests were performed, comparing the total score of the STQ with that of the anxiety and avoidance subscales of the Social Interaction and Performance Anxiety and Avoidance Scale (SIPAAS). A very significant conceptual convergence was confirmed between the STQ and with the SIPAAS-Anxiety (r = .64; p < .0001) and with the SIPAAS-Avoidance (r = .59; p < .0001). The exploratory factor analysis, with Promax rotation, revealed 3 factors: dislike of physical touch, liking of familiar physical touch and liking of public physical touch (Cronbach’s alphas ranged from .68 to .75). Psychometric properties confirmed the adaptation of the STQ to the Portuguese culture. It is a reliable and valid self-report questionnaire and it appears to be a useful tool to assess behaviors and attitudes towards social touch.
引用
收藏
页码:363 / 377
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Reliability and validity of a Turkish version of Leicester cough questionnaire
    Gonen, Nazmiye Akis
    Havlucu, Yavuz
    Yorgancioglu, Arzu
    Goktalay, Tugba
    Coskun, Aysin Sakar
    Celik, Pinar
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2015, 46
  • [32] The reliability and validity of the Hungarian version of the Surgical Fear Questionnaire
    Wittmann Victoria
    Csabai Marta
    Drotos Gergely
    Lazar Gyorgy
    ORVOSI HETILAP, 2018, 159 (47) : 1988 - 1993
  • [33] Reliability and validity of Leicester Cough Questionnaire Korean version
    Han, Jong-Min
    Jung, In-Chul
    Kang, Weechang
    Kim, Seung-Su
    Yeo, Yoon
    Park, Yang-Chun
    CHRONIC RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 2014, 11 (03) : 147 - 152
  • [34] Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Pain Disability Questionnaire
    Yoon, Jisun
    Choi, Kyoung Hyo
    Kim, Tae Woo
    Yang, Seo Yon
    Sim, Mi Kyung
    ANNALS OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE-ARM, 2013, 37 (06): : 814 - 823
  • [35] The reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the Fear of Pain Questionnaire
    Sole, Ester
    Castarlenas, Elena
    Sanchez-Rodriguez, Elisabet
    Galan, Santiago
    de la Vega, Rocio
    Jensen, Mark P.
    Miro, Jordi
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 24 (08) : 1134 - 1144
  • [36] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Breathlessness Beliefs Questionnaire
    Wu, Qing
    Guo, AiMin
    Zhao, YanWei
    Li, Sijia
    Huang, Hui
    CHRONIC RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 2018, 15 (02) : 114 - 122
  • [37] Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire
    Erdogan, Sengul
    Ucpunar, Habibe K.
    Cangoz Tavat, Banu
    TURK PSIKIYATRI DERGISI, 2022, 33 (04) : 274 - 279
  • [38] Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire
    Lin, Chuan-Ju
    Shiah, I-Shin
    Chu, Hsin
    Tsai, Pei-Shan
    Chen, Chiung-Hua
    Chang, Yue-Cune
    Chou, Kuei-Ru
    ARCHIVES OF PSYCHIATRIC NURSING, 2011, 25 (01) : 53 - 62
  • [39] Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Parenting Concerns Questionnaire
    Yanai, Misa
    Aoyama, Maho
    Kosugi, Kazuhiro
    Tsumura, Akemi
    Nakanishi, Erika
    Miyashita, Mitsunori
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 54 (07) : 797 - 804
  • [40] Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Childhood Trauma Questionnaire
    Sar, Vedat
    Ozturk, Erdinc
    Ikikardes, Eda
    TURKIYE KLINIKLERI TIP BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2012, 32 (04): : 1054 - 1063