Spatial based compromise programming for multiple criteria decision making in land use planning

被引:0
|
作者
Sumbangan Baja
David M. Chapman
Deirdre Dragovich
机构
[1] Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry Hasanuddin University,Department of Soil Science
[2] The University of Sydney,School of Geosciences
来源
关键词
compromise programming; fuzzy set; GIS; land use planning; multiple criteria decision making; spatial modelling;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Today, competing land use is continuing to occur in many developed regions. In the Agricultural Development Zone of Western Sydney Region, which is characterised by complex landscape patterns, land use competition is widespread. From a land use planning perspective, identification of suitable locations for a given type of land use is necessary for decision makers to formulate land use alternatives in different locations, based on existing land potential and constraints. For such a region, use of a simple method that implements a categorical system and considers only inherent land characteristics in the analysis is often inadequate to arrive at an optimal spatial decision. The primary aim of this paper is to develop spatial modelling procedures for agricultural land suitability analysis using compromise programming (CoPr) and fuzzy set approach within a geographical information systems (GIS) environment. Five main sets of spatial data for use as decision criteria were developed by using fuzzy set methodology: a land suitability index (LSI) for maximising the land productivity objective; an erosion tolerance index (ETI) for minimising the erosion risk objective; a runoff curve number (CN) for maximising the water discharge regulation objective; an accessibility (RP) measure for maximising the land accessibility objective; and the proximity to water body (WP) for minimising the water pollution objective. An Lp-metric was used in the analysis utilising different strategies with representative indices ranging from a situation where full tradeoff among criteria occurs to a noncompensatory condition. Different weighting combinations were also applied, and decision analysis was carried out by using values ranging from 0 to 1.0, where 1.0 is considered as an ideal point. The CoPr model demonstrated in this paper yielded a promising result, as several different techniques of sensitivity analysis show reasonably good results. Likewise, an overlay of that result with the present land use/land cover indicates a good corresponding spatial matching between existing land use (orchard and cultivated land), and the cells (land parcels) classified as the best in CoPr. The results are amenable to various map display techniques, either using continuous values or by defining different cut off points in the data space within a raster GIS environment.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 184
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Risk Based Weight Determination in Multiple Criteria Decision Making
    Liu, Yin
    GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2024, : 69 - 104
  • [42] Decision Making with Multiple Criteria and Uncertainty
    Eiselt, H. A.
    Marianov, Vladimir
    SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER APPLICATIONS, 2011, 9 : 165 - 167
  • [43] Multiple criteria group decision making based on group satisfaction
    Fu, Chao
    Chang, Wenjun
    Yang, Shanlin
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2020, 518 : 309 - 329
  • [44] Competencies Assessment Approach based on Multiple Criteria Decision Making
    Ikram, Bensouna
    Benbrahim Chahinaze, Fikri
    Naoufal, Sefiani
    Hamid, Azzouzi
    LOGISTIQUA2020: 2020 IEEE 13TH INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM OF LOGISTICS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT (LOGISTIQUA 2020), 2020,
  • [45] Capacity planning model using linear fractional programming in a context of multiple decision criteria
    Kalenatic, Dusko
    Lopez Bello, Cesar Amilcar
    Gonzalez Rodriguez, Leonardo Jose
    INGENIERIA, 2006, 11 (02): : 48 - 60
  • [46] Multiple criteria decision making for engineering
    Wiecek, Margaret M.
    Ehrgott, Matthias
    Fadel, Georges
    Figueira, Jose Rui
    OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2008, 36 (03): : 337 - 339
  • [47] MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    GRANDZOL, J
    GERSHON, M
    QUALITY PROGRESS, 1994, 27 (01) : 69 - 73
  • [48] Fuzzy Linear Physical Programming for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Under Uncertainty
    ElSayed, A.
    Kongar, E.
    Gupta, S. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS COMMUNICATIONS & CONTROL, 2016, 11 (01) : 26 - 38
  • [49] A linear programming technique to solve fuzzy multiple criteria decision making problems with an application
    Sadabadi, Seyed Ali
    Hadi-Vencheh, Abdollah
    Jamshidi, Ali
    Jalali, Mohammad
    RAIRO-OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2021, 55 (01) : 83 - 97
  • [50] APPLICATION OF COMPROMISE MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODS FOR EVALUATION OF TCDD'S RAILWAY LINES PROJECTS
    Kilic, Osman
    Cercioglu, Hakan
    JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE OF GAZI UNIVERSITY, 2016, 31 (01): : 211 - 220