Role Balance and Marital Satisfaction in Taiwanese Couples: An Actor-Partner Interdependence Model Approach

被引:0
|
作者
Lung Hung Chen
Tsui-Shan Li
机构
[1] National Taiwan Sport University,Department of Recreation and Leisure Industry Management
[2] Fu Jen Catholic University,Department of Child and Family Studies
来源
Social Indicators Research | 2012年 / 107卷
关键词
Positive psychology; Dyad; Self-system; Nonindependence of observation; Marital satisfaction;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Role balance theory proposed that a well-organized self-system, rather than a salient hierarchy role, contributes to individual psychological well-being. However, research on role balance focuses only on the intrapersonal process without regard for the interpersonal process on the spouse’s well-being. Furthermore, pervious studies were all conducted in the East cultures (countries) which lead to the doubt whether the theory could be applied into East cultures such as collectivism. Therefore, in this study, we surveyed 204 dyads form Taiwan. Participants completed the Role Balance Scale and Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale. The Actor-Partner Interdependence Model (APIM) was used to analyze the data. Results indicated that the husband’s role balance positively predicted his own and his wife’s marital satisfaction. Similarly, the wife’s role balance also had a positive effect on her own and her husband’s marital satisfaction. These results suggest that the influence of role balance is bidirectional within couples. Moreover, model comparisons demonstrated that the wife’s marital satisfaction was affected more by her own role balance than by her husband’s role balance. Possible mechanisms, limitations and implications of this study are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 199
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Vocational interests and relationship satisfaction: An actor-partner interdependence model
    Banov, Katarina
    Krapic, Nada
    Kardum, Igor
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2022, 187
  • [22] THE ROLE OF INDIVIDUALS' AND THEIR PARTNERS' POSITIVITY IN THE SATISFACTION WITH THE RELATIONSHIP: AN ACTOR-PARTNER INTERDEPENDENCE MEDIATION MODEL
    Theodorou, Annalisa
    Livi, Stefano
    Alessandri, Guido
    TPM-TESTING PSYCHOMETRICS METHODOLOGY IN APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 27 (03) : 331 - 359
  • [23] Moderation in the actor-partner interdependence model
    Garcia, Randi L.
    Kenny, David A.
    Ledermann, Thomas
    PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 2015, 22 (01) : 8 - 29
  • [24] Reflections on the actor-partner interdependence model
    Kenny, David A.
    PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 2018, 25 (02) : 160 - 170
  • [25] Attachment and relationship satisfaction: An Actor-Partner Interdependence Model at the empty nest
    Bouchard, Genevieve
    Thibodeau, Jannie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 58 : 356 - 357
  • [26] A Study on the Relationship Between Marital Socioeconomic Status, Marital Satisfaction, and Depression: Analysis Based on Actor-Partner Interdependence Model (APIM)
    Du, Wenbin
    Luo, Muyuan
    Zhou, Zheng
    APPLIED RESEARCH IN QUALITY OF LIFE, 2022, 17 (03) : 1477 - 1499
  • [27] Health Promoting Behavior in Pregnant Couples: Actor-Partner Interdependence Model Analysis
    Kim, Ju Hee
    Song, Young-A
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN ACADEMY OF NURSING, 2017, 47 (04) : 467 - 475
  • [28] Parental Burnout and Job Burnout in Working Couples: An Actor-Partner Interdependence Model
    Wang, Wei
    Wang, Shengnan
    Chen, Shen
    Li, Yongxin
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 36 (05) : 704 - 712
  • [29] Couples' Cognition, Intimacy, and Activity Engagement: An Actor-Partner Interdependence Model Analysis
    Su, Fan
    Chao, Jianqian
    Zhang, Bowen
    Zhang, Na
    Luo, Zongyu
    Han, Jiaying
    CLINICAL GERONTOLOGIST, 2023,
  • [30] Emotion dysregulation and couple relationship satisfaction of clinical couples: An actor-partner interdependence model(sic)(sic)(sic)
    Xu, Min
    Johnson, Lee N.
    Anderson, Shayne R.
    Hunt, Quintin
    Bradford, Angela B.
    Witting, Alyssa Banford
    Bean, Roy
    Miller, Rick B.
    FAMILY PROCESS, 2023, 62 (04) : 1555 - 1573