Performance Comparison of Wavelet and Contourlet Frame Based Features for Improving Classification Accuracy in Remote Sensing Images

被引:0
|
作者
K. Venkateswaran
N. Kasthuri
R. A. Alaguraja
机构
[1] Kongu Engineering College Perundurai,
[2] Thiagarajar College of Engineering,undefined
关键词
Wavelet based contourlet transform (WBCT); Feature extraction; Feature reduction; Feature classification; Accuracy assessment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Conventional classification algorithms makes the use of only multispectral information in remote sensing image classification. Wavelet provides spatial and spectral characteristics of a pixel along with its neighbours and hence this can be utilized for an improved classification. The major disadvantage of wavelet transform is the non availability of spatial frequency features in its directional components. The contourlet transform based laplacian pyramid followed by directional filter banks is an efficient way of extracting features in the directional components. In this paper different contourlet frame based feature extraction techniques for remote sensing images are proposed. Principal component analysis (PCA) method is used to reduce the number of features. Gaussian Kernel fuzzy C-means classifiers uses these features to improve the classification accuracy. Accuracy assessment based on field visit data and cluster validity measures are used to measure the accuracy of the classified data. The experimental result shows that the overall accuracy is improved to 1.73 % (for LISS-II), 1.81 % (for LISS-III) and 1.95 % (for LISS-IV) and the kappa coefficient is improved to 0.933 (for LISS-II), 0.0103 (for LISS-III) and 0.0214 (for LISS-IV) and also the cluster validity measures gives better results when compared to existing method
引用
收藏
页码:729 / 737
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Fusion of Remote Sensing Images Based on Nonsubsampled Contourlet Transform and Region Segmentation
    吴一全
    吴超
    吴诗婳
    JournalofShanghaiJiaotongUniversity(Science), 2011, 16 (06) : 722 - 727
  • [22] Fusion of remote sensing images based on nonsubsampled contourlet transform and region segmentation
    Wu Y.-Q.
    Wu C.
    Wu S.-H.
    Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science), 2011, 16 (6) : 722 - 727
  • [23] ASSESSING UNCERTAINTIES IN ACCURACY OF LANDUSE CLASSIFICATION USING REMOTE SENSING IMAGES
    Hsiao, Lin-Hsuan
    Cheng, Ke-Sheng
    8TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SPATIAL DATA QUALITY, 2013, 40-2 (w1): : 19 - 23
  • [24] Wavelet Based Features For Ultrasound Placenta Images Classification
    Malathi, G.
    Shanthi, V.
    2009 SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EMERGING TRENDS IN ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (ICETET 2009), 2009, : 751 - +
  • [25] A comparison of resampling methods for remote sensing classification and accuracy assessment
    Lyons, Mitchell B.
    Keith, David A.
    Phinn, Stuart R.
    Mason, Tanya J.
    Elith, Jane
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 208 : 145 - 153
  • [26] A Mosaic Approach for Remote Sensing Images Based on Wavelet Transform
    Cheng, Yuanhang
    Han, Xiaowei
    Xue, Dingyu
    2008 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, NETWORKING AND MOBILE COMPUTING, VOLS 1-31, 2008, : 3218 - +
  • [27] Remote Sensing Images Classification Using Moment Features and Attribute Profiles
    Roochi, Niloofar Ghasemi
    Ghassemian, Hassan
    Mirzapour, Fardin
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SIGNAL AND IMAGE PROCESSING APPLICATIONS (ICSIPA), 2017, : 49 - 54
  • [28] Classification methods for hyperspectral remote sensing images with weak texture features
    Wang, Yong
    Gu, Mengyu
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH AND APPLIED SCIENCES, 2024, 17 (03)
  • [29] An experimental comparison on gabor wavelet and wavelet frame based features for image retrieval
    Qiao, YL
    Pan, JS
    Sun, SH
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED INTELLIGENT INFORMATION AND ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, PT 3, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3683 : 353 - 358
  • [30] Improving Classification Accuracy of Heart Sound Recordings by Wavelet Filter and Multiple Features
    Wang, Xinpei
    Lie, Yuanyang
    2016 COMPUTING IN CARDIOLOGY CONFERENCE (CINC), VOL 43, 2016, 43 : 1149 - 1152