Enhancing the Safety and Efficacy of Food Allergy Immunotherapy: a Review of Adjunctive Therapies

被引:0
|
作者
Yamini V. Virkud
Julie Wang
Wayne G. Shreffler
机构
[1] Massachusetts General Hospital,Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics
[2] Mount Sinai Hospital,Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics
来源
Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology | 2018年 / 55卷
关键词
Food allergy; Oral immunotherapy; Immunotherapy; Anti-IgE; Omalizumab; Nanoparticles; Toll-like receptor agonists;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Food allergy is a potentially life-threatening condition with no approved curative therapy. A number of food allergen immunotherapies are being investigated in phase II/III trials; however, these are limited in their ability to restore immune tolerance to food allergens and often result in high rates of allergic side effects, sometimes involving anaphylaxis, that may curtail their impact. A variety of adjunctive therapies have been developed in order to enhance the efficacy and/or improve the safety of food allergen immunotherapy through either shifting the immune response from a Th2 polarized response to a Th1 and regulatory T cell dominated response or by blocking downstream effects of the allergic inflammatory response by targeting IgE or mast cell mediators. Upstream therapies that shift towards a Th1/Treg response include toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 agonists (e.g., MPL and GLA), TLR9 agonists (CpG oligonucleotides), nanoparticles encapsulating peanut allergen (with and without adjuvants, such as CpG or rapamycin), Chinese herbal medicine (food allergy herbal formula (FAHF-2)), probiotics, and interferon-gamma. In contrast, anti-IgE therapies such as omalizumab, anti-histamines like ketotifen, and leukotriene receptor antagonists all target the downstream allergic response. Anti-IgE-based therapies appear to be furthest along with probiotics, Chinese herbal medicines, and TLR-4 agonists currently in early phase clinical trials. Meanwhile, nanoparticles represent an innovative delivery vehicle for immunotherapy that could improve both efficacy and decrease allergic side effects. Furthermore, other biologic therapies directed towards the allergic immune response are on the horizon. A number of factors will need to be evaluated in comparing these treatments, including ability to decrease allergic adverse events, safety of the adjunctive therapies themselves, effect on long-term sustained unresponsiveness, and cost. Further phenotyping of food allergy patients may be necessary to determine which ones respond best to each therapy. However, with so many promising adjunctive therapies, it appears likely that clinicians will have a variety of options to optimize the administration of food allergen immunotherapy. We provided a review of these methods, their influence on allergic adverse events, and utility in improving the immunomodulatory effects of food allergen immunotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:172 / 189
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy (PACE): a systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety
    Chu, Derek K.
    Wood, Robert A.
    French, Shannon
    Fiocchi, Alessandro
    Jordana, Manel
    Waserman, Susan
    Brozek, Jan L.
    Schuenemann, Holger J.
    LANCET, 2019, 393 (10187): : 2222 - 2232
  • [22] Enhancing efficacy, safety, and convenience of immunotherapy: a workshop presentation
    Finegold, I
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2006, 96 (02) : S26 - S30
  • [23] Immunotherapy for food allergy
    Wild L.G.
    Lehrer S.B.
    Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, 2001, 1 (1) : 48 - 53
  • [24] Immunotherapy in food allergy
    Kamdar, Toral
    Bryce, Paul J.
    IMMUNOTHERAPY, 2010, 2 (03) : 329 - 338
  • [25] Efficacy and safety of rush immunotherapy in patients with Hymenoptera allergy in Japan
    Hirata, H
    Asakura, T
    Arima, M
    Cheng, G
    Honda, K
    Fukushima, F
    Yamaguchi, B
    Yoshida, N
    Fukuda, T
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2003, 21 (02): : 89 - 94
  • [26] Immunotherapy and food allergy
    Rance, F.
    REVUE FRANCAISE D ALLERGOLOGIE ET D IMMUNOLOGIE CLINIQUE, 2008, 48 (03): : 123 - 126
  • [27] Immunotherapy for food allergy
    Reisacher, William R.
    Davison, Wesley
    CURRENT OPINION IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY & HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2017, 25 (03): : 235 - 241
  • [28] Comparative Safety and Efficacy of Sublingual and Oral Immunotherapy for Milk Allergy
    Keet, C.
    Thyagarajan, A.
    Boden, S.
    Driggers, S.
    Hamilton, R.
    Burks, A.
    Wood, R.
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2011, 127 (02) : AB71 - AB71
  • [29] Six months Epicutaneous Immunotherapy in peanut allergy: safety and efficacy
    Dupont, C.
    Bourrier, T.
    de Blay, F.
    Guenard, L.
    Castelain, M.
    Cousin, M.
    Sauvage, C.
    Kanny, G.
    Jarlot, S.
    Karila, C.
    ALLERGY, 2012, 67 : 600 - 600
  • [30] COMBINATORIAL IMMUNOTHERAPY WITH ADJUNCTIVE OMALIZUMAB FOR PEANUT ALLERGY
    Lawicki, J.
    Dhillon, H.
    Arumani, S.
    Kung, C.
    Flores, M.
    Jubboori, S.
    Afghani, B.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2019, 67 (01) : 261 - 262