Distribution and activity of bats at local and landscape scales within a rural-urban gradient

被引:52
|
作者
Johnson J.B. [1 ,3 ]
Gates J.E. [1 ]
Ford W.M. [2 ]
机构
[1] University of Maryland, Center for Environmental Science, Appalachian Laboratory, Frostburg, MD 21532
[2] U.S. Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Parsons, WV 26287
[3] Division of Forestry and Natural Resources, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506
关键词
Bats; Forest fragmentation; Landscape; National capital region; Urbanization;
D O I
10.1007/s11252-008-0055-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We examined the relationship between bat species activity and composition and the extent of forest cover and urbanization in and adjacent to 11 U.S. National Park Service, National Capital Region Parks in Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, and Washington, D.C., from 2003-2004, using mist nets, harp traps, acoustical detectors, and visual observations in a variety of habitats. Our efforts included 363 trap nights across 74 sites along with acoustical sampling at 362 sites. We captured 383 bats and identified 6,380 echolocation passes of 6 species. Both overall and species-specific activities were affected more by forest fragmentation within parks than by urbanization adjacent to parks. With an ability to exploit anthropogenic structures for day-roosts, big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) were the most ubiquitous and probably the most abundant species in NCR Parks, particularly in forested, urban parks. Northern myotis (Myotis septentrionalis), and to a lesser extent, little brown myotis (Myotis lucifugus) were more prevalent in forested, rural parks of the Ridge and Valley and Blue Ridge than in eastern, less forested urban parks of the Piedmont and Coastal Plain physiographic provinces. Retention of larger, residual forest tracts and day-roosting habitat (i.e., trees and snags) would be beneficial to most species, as urban expansion continues throughout the region. © 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 242
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Bee community response to local and landscape factors along an urban-rural gradient
    Kristen R. Birdshire
    Adrian L. Carper
    Christy E. Briles
    Urban Ecosystems, 2020, 23 : 689 - 702
  • [22] Regional variations in the rural-urban fertility gradient in the global South
    Lerch, Mathias
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (07):
  • [23] Urban-associated drivers of song variation along a rural-urban gradient
    Narango, Desiree L.
    Rodewald, Amanda D.
    BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2016, 27 (02) : 608 - 616
  • [24] RURAL-URBAN DISTRIBUTION OF MEDICAL-SCHOOL APPLICANTS
    CULLISON, S
    REID, JC
    COLWILL, JM
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, 1976, 51 (01): : 47 - 49
  • [25] THE IMPACT OF RURAL-URBAN MIGRATION ON INCOME-DISTRIBUTION
    RODGERS, G
    REVUE CANADIENNE D ETUDES DU DEVELOPPEMENT-CANADIAN JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 1983, 4 (02): : 275 - 296
  • [27] Changes in Soil Fungal Diversity and Composition along a Rural-Urban Gradient
    Rusterholz, Hans-Peter
    Baur, Bruno
    FORESTS, 2023, 14 (11):
  • [28] Rural-urban gradient analysis of ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics
    Kroll, Franziska
    Mueller, Felix
    Haase, Dagmar
    Fohrer, Nicola
    LAND USE POLICY, 2012, 29 (03) : 521 - 535
  • [29] Social gradient and rural-urban disparities in cancer mortality in Costa Rica
    Fantin, Romain
    Sierra, Monica S.
    Vaccarella, Salvatore
    Herrero, Rolando
    Barboza-Solis, Cristina
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 91
  • [30] Abiotic and biotic drivers of strawberry productivity across a rural-urban gradient
    Scherr, Kyla D.
    Jamieson, Mary A.
    BASIC AND APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2021, 57 : 65 - 77