Novel indicators of the trade and welfare effects of agricultural distortions in OECD countries

被引:0
|
作者
Kym Anderson
Johanna Croser
机构
[1] University of Adelaide,School of Economics
来源
Review of World Economics | 2011年 / 147卷
关键词
Distorted incentives; Agricultural price and trade policies; Trade restrictiveness index; F13; F14; Q17; Q18;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Agricultural markets in OECD countries have long been highly distorted by government policies. Traditional weighted average aggregates of the price distortions involved, such as producer and consumer support estimates (PSEs and CSEs), can be poor indicators of the trade restrictiveness and economic welfare losses associated with them, especially if a country’s support estimates vary a lot across the product range. Certainly estimates of trade and welfare effects of price supports can be obtained from sectoral or economywide models using price elasticity estimates, but the results can be contentious if there is no consensus on what model specification and elasticity parameters to use. This paper shows that, if there is a willingness to accept simple assumptions about elasticities, it is possible to generate indicators of the welfare and trade restrictiveness of agricultural policies using no more than the price and quantity data needed to generate PSEs and CSEs. These new indexes thus provide an attractive supplement to the current policy monitoring regime developed by the OECD Secretariat.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 302
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] International trade costs in OECD countries
    Christos Staboulis
    Dimitrios Natos
    Efthimia Tsakiridou
    Konstadinos Mattas
    Operational Research, 2020, 20 : 1177 - 1187
  • [22] International trade costs in OECD countries
    Staboulis, Christos
    Natos, Dimitrios
    Tsakiridou, Efthimia
    Mattas, Konstadinos
    OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (03) : 1177 - 1187
  • [23] Welfare gains from international trade and renewable energy demand: Evidence from the OECD countries
    Lu, Zhou
    Gozgor, Giray
    Mahalik, Mantu Kumar
    Padhan, Hemachandra
    Yan, Cheng
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2022, 112
  • [24] Policy coherence and food security: The effects of OECD countries' agricultural policies
    Brooks, Jonathan
    FOOD POLICY, 2014, 44 : 88 - 94
  • [25] Bilateral trade effects of fiscal devaluation: Evidence from OECD countries
    Kiral, Halis
    Erden, Lutfi
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 27 (06): : 585 - 606
  • [26] Intersectoral distortions and the welfare gains from trade
    Swiecki, Tomasz
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 104 : 138 - 156
  • [27] The welfare impact of global migration in OECD countries
    Aubry, Amandine
    Burzynski, Michal
    Docquier, Frrederic
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 101 : 1 - 21
  • [28] The effects of agricultural product exports on agricultural environmental pollution: evidence from OECD countries and China
    Liu, Zhen
    Cai, Renjie
    Li, Ruotong
    Lan, Jing
    ECONOMIC CHANGE AND RESTRUCTURING, 2023, 56 (06) : 4071 - 4098
  • [29] Agricultural trade liberalization: growth, welfare and large country effects
    Parikh, KS
    Narayana, NSS
    Panda, M
    Kumar, AG
    AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1997, 17 (01) : 1 - 20
  • [30] Analysis of Wages and Selected Indicators in OECD Countries
    Bilkova, Diana
    POLITICKA EKONOMIE, 2019, 67 (02) : 133 - 156