Coordinated and Tailored Work Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Economic Evaluation Undertaken with Workers on Sick Leave Due to Musculoskeletal Disorders

被引:0
|
作者
Ute Bültmann
David Sherson
Jens Olsen
Carl Lysbeck Hansen
Thomas Lund
Jørgen Kilsgaard
机构
[1] University Medical Center Groningen,Department of Health Sciences, Section of Social Medicine, Work & Health
[2] University of Groningen,Department of Health Sciences
[3] National Research Centre for the Working Environment,Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
[4] Vejle Hospital,Centre for Applied Health Services Research and Technology Assessment
[5] University of Southern Denmark,Department of Employment and Integration
[6] The Danish National Centre for Social Research,Department of Development and Labor Market
[7] Vejle County,undefined
[8] KIApro,undefined
来源
关键词
Musculoskeletal disorder; Sickness absence; Interdisciplinary team; Return-to-work; Coordinated rehabilitation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction In Denmark, the magnitude and impact of work disability on the individual worker and society has prompted the development of a new “coordinated and tailored work rehabilitation” (CTWR) approach. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of CTWR with conventional case management (CCM) on return-to-work of workers on sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). Methods The study was a randomized controlled trial with economic evaluation undertaken with workers on sick leave for 4–12 weeks due to MSDs. CTWR consists of a work disability screening by an interdisciplinary team followed by the collaborative development of a RTW plan. The primary outcome variable was registered cumulative sickness absence hours during 12 months follow-up. Secondary outcomes were work status as well as pain intensity and functional disability, measured at baseline, 3 and 12 months follow-up. The economic evaluation (intervention costs, productivity loss, and health care utilization costs) was based on administrative data derived from national registries. Results For the time intervals 0–6 months, 6–12 months, and the entire follow-up period, the number of sickness absence hours was significantly lower in the CTWR group as compared to the control group. The total costs saved in CTWR participants compared to controls were estimated at US $ 1,366 per person at 6 months follow-up and US $ 10,666 per person at 12 months follow-up. Conclusions Workers on sick leave for 4–12 weeks due to MSD who underwent “CTWR” by an interdisciplinary team had fewer sickness absence hours than controls. The economic evaluation showed that—in terms of productivity loss—CTWR seems to be cost saving for the society.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 93
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Tailored exercise program reduces symptoms of upper limb work-related musculoskeletal disorders in a group of metalworkers: A randomized controlled trial
    Rasotto, Chiara
    Bergamin, Marco
    Simonetti, Alberto
    Maso, Stefano
    Bartolucci, Giovanni B.
    Ermolao, Andrea
    Zaccaria, Marco
    MANUAL THERAPY, 2015, 20 (01) : 56 - 62
  • [42] Effects of ergonomic intervention on work-related upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders among computer workers: a randomized controlled trial
    Sina Esmaeilzadeh
    Emel Ozcan
    Nalan Capan
    International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 2014, 87 : 73 - 83
  • [43] Effects of ergonomic intervention on work-related upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders among computer workers: a randomized controlled trial
    Esmaeilzadeh, Sina
    Ozcan, Emel
    Capan, Nalan
    INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2014, 87 (01) : 73 - 83
  • [44] Effectiveness of a worksite lifestyle intervention on vitality, work engagement, productivity, and sick leave: results of a randomized controlled trial
    Strijk, Jorien E.
    Proper, Karin I.
    van Mechelen, Willem
    van der Beek, Allard J.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 2013, 39 (01) : 66 - 75
  • [45] Effects of a Person-Centered eHealth Intervention for Patients on Sick Leave Due to Common Mental Disorders (PROMISE Study): Open Randomized Controlled Trial
    Cederberg, Matilda
    Alsen, Sara
    Ali, Lilas
    Ekman, Inger
    Glise, Kristina
    Jonsdottir, Ingibjorg H.
    Gyllensten, Hanna
    Swedberg, Karl
    Fors, Andreas
    JMIR MENTAL HEALTH, 2022, 9 (03):
  • [46] The comparative effects of brief or multidisciplinary intervention on return to work at 1 year in employees on sick leave due to low back pain: A randomized controlled trial
    Langagergaard, Vivian
    Jensen, Ole Kudsk
    Nielsen, Claus Vinther
    Jensen, Chris
    Labriola, Merete
    Sorensen, Vibeke Neergaard
    Pedersen, Pernille
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2021, 35 (09) : 1290 - 1304
  • [47] Effects of intensified work-related multidisciplinary rehabilitation on occupational participation: a randomized-controlled trial in patients with chronic musculoskeletal disorders
    Streibelt, Marco
    Bethge, Matthias
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, 2014, 37 (01) : 61 - 66
  • [48] Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an exposure-based return-to-work programme for patients on sick leave due to common mental disorders: design of a cluster-randomized controlled trial
    Erik Noordik
    Frank J van Dijk
    Karen Nieuwenhuijsen
    Jac JL van der Klink
    BMC Public Health, 9
  • [49] Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an exposure-based return-to-work programme for patients on sick leave due to common mental disorders: design of a cluster-randomized controlled trial
    Noordik, Erik
    Van Dijk, Frank J.
    Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen
    van der Klink, Jac J. L.
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2009, 9
  • [50] A Tailored Workplace Exercise Program for Women at Risk for Neck and Upper Limb Musculoskeletal Disorders A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Rasotto, Chiara
    Bergamin, Marco
    Sieverdes, John C.
    Gobbo, Stefano
    Alberton, Cristine L.
    Neunhaeuserer, Daniel
    Maso, Stefano
    Zaccaria, Marco
    Ermolao, Andrea
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2015, 57 (02) : 178 - 183