Contrasting approaches to the generation of environmental improvement options for production systems

被引:0
|
作者
René Van Berkel
Michela Van Kampen
机构
[1] CSBP Chair in Cleaner Production,
[2] Curtin University of Technology,undefined
[3] GPO Box U1987,undefined
[4] Perth,undefined
[5] WA 6845,undefined
[6] Australia e-mail: r.vanberkel@curtin.edu.au Tel: +61-8-92664240 Fax: +61-8-92664811,undefined
[7] IVAM Environmental Research,undefined
[8] University of Amsterdam,undefined
[9] P.O. Box 18180,undefined
[10] 1001 ZB Amsterdam,undefined
[11] The Netherlands,undefined
来源
Clean Products and Processes | 2001年 / 3卷 / 1期
关键词
Environmental Impact; Production Process; Production System; Common Type; Diagnostic Approach;
D O I
10.1007/s100980000097
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This article reviews two common types of improvement tools presently used in industry to identify opportunities to prevent or at least to reduce the environmental impacts of production systems and processes. Despite their proven ability to result in appropriate environmental improvement options in different industry sectors, their successful application is hampered by the fact that these tools do not take the specific causes of the environmental impacts of the production process into account, i.e. the question of which process features cause the environmental impacts of the production process is not raised nor is the flexibility for change of the production system taken into consideration. This paper sets the stage for a new generation of improvement tools, based on an environmental diagnosis of the production system. The diagnosis aims to result in a thorough understanding of the production system to guide and drive the identification of environmental improvement options that specifically target process-, product-, and site-specific environmental conditions. Alternative ways to develop such a diagnostic approach on the basis of presently used tools are being explored, and a synthesis thereof is proposed to achieve synergy between these contrasting approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 34
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Production Systems Continuous Improvement Modelling
    Khayrullina, Marina
    Kislitsyna, Olga
    Chuvaev, Alexey
    QUALITY INNOVATION PROSPERITY-KVALITA INOVACIA PROSPERITA, 2015, 19 (02): : 73 - 86
  • [32] Hypothesis generation in quality improvement projects: Approaches for exploratory studies
    de Mast, Jeroen
    Bergman, Marcus
    QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 22 (07) : 839 - 850
  • [33] Electric Power Supply Reliability Improvement Approaches of Generation Unit
    Ivanovskiy, Dmitriy A.
    Pirozhnik, Aleksandr A.
    2019 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, APPLICATIONS AND MANUFACTURING (ICIEAM), 2019,
  • [34] Approaches to grey prediction and control of environmental systems
    Chen, WZ
    Chen, ZJ
    Chen, QL
    Chen, MY
    18th International Conference on Systems Engineering, Proceedings, 2005, : 152 - 157
  • [35] Systems Approaches for Addressing Complex Environmental Problems
    Zhang, Qiong
    Eckelman, Matthew J.
    Fu, Guangtao
    Liang, Sai
    Mihelcic, James R.
    Mo, Weiwei
    Zimmerman, Julie B.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 58 (43) : 19093 - 19094
  • [36] Acetogenic mixotrophy: novel options for yield improvement in biofuels and biochemicals production
    Fast, Alan G.
    Schmidt, Ellinor D.
    Jones, Shawn W.
    Tracy, Bryan P.
    CURRENT OPINION IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2015, 33 : 60 - 72
  • [37] Carbon Footprint Assessment of Sweet Cherry Production: Hotspots and Improvement Options
    Bravo, Grecia
    Lopez, Diego
    Vasquez, Marcia
    Iriarte, Alfredo
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2017, 26 (02): : 559 - 566
  • [38] Systems approaches and ecological modernisation of horticultural production systems
    Rabbinge, R
    Rossing, WAH
    Wagenmakers, PS
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER MODELLING IN FRUIT RESEARCH AND ORCHARD MANAGEMENT, 1999, (499): : 19 - 29
  • [39] A comparison of adaptive management and real options approaches for environmental decisions under uncertainty
    Chades, I.
    Tarnopolskaya, T.
    Dunstall, S.
    Rhodes, J.
    Tulloch, A.
    21ST INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON MODELLING AND SIMULATION (MODSIM2015), 2015, : 1056 - 1062
  • [40] The use of agri-environmental measures to address environmental pressures in Germany: Spatial mismatches and options for improvement
    Frueh-Mueller, Andrea
    Bach, Martin
    Breuer, Lutz
    Hotes, Stefan
    Koellner, Thomas
    Krippes, Christian
    Wolters, Volkmar
    LAND USE POLICY, 2019, 84 : 347 - 362