Empirical evaluation of computational fear contagion models in crowd dispersions

被引:0
|
作者
Jason Tsai
Emma Bowring
Stacy Marsella
Milind Tambe
机构
[1] University of Southern California,
[2] University of the Pacific,undefined
[3] USC Institute for Creative Technologies,undefined
来源
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems | 2013年 / 27卷
关键词
Emotional contagion; Emotion modeling; Simulation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In social psychology, emotional contagion describes the widely observed phenomenon of one person’s emotions being influenced by surrounding people’s emotions. While the overall effect is agreed upon, the underlying mechanism of the spread of emotions has seen little quantification and application to computational agents despite extensive evidence of its impacts in everyday life. In this paper, we examine computational models of emotional contagion by implementing two models (Bosse et al., European council on modeling and simulation, pp. 212–218, 2009) and Durupinar, From audiences to mobs: Crowd simulation with psychological factors, PhD dissertation, Bilkent University, 2010) that draw from two separate lines of contagion research: thermodynamics-based and epidemiological-based. We first perform sensitivity tests on each model in an evacuation simulation, ESCAPES, showing both models to be reasonably robust to parameter variations with certain exceptions. We then compare their ability to reproduce a real crowd panic scene in simulation, showing that the thermodynamics-style model (Bosse et al., European council on modeling and simulation, pp. 212–218, 2009) produces superior results due to the ill-suited contagion mechanism at the core of epidemiological models. We also identify that a graduated effect of fear and proximity-based contagion effects are key to producing the superior results. We then reproduce the methodology on a second video, showing that the same results hold, implying generality of the conclusions reached in the first scene.
引用
收藏
页码:200 / 217
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An evaluation of crowd counting methods, features and regression models
    Ryan, David
    Denman, Simon
    Sridharan, Sridha
    Fookes, Clinton
    COMPUTER VISION AND IMAGE UNDERSTANDING, 2015, 130 : 1 - 17
  • [22] Evaluation of Crowd Models in Low Density Scenarios Using Real-world Crowd Data
    Zhao, Mingbi
    Cai, Wentong
    Turner, Stephen John
    2015 IEEE/ACM 19TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON DISTRIBUTED SIMULATION AND REAL TIME APPLICATIONS (DS-RT), 2015, : 1 - 9
  • [23] Quantitative comparison between crowd models for evacuation planning and evaluation
    Vaisagh Viswanathan
    Chong Eu Lee
    Michael Harold Lees
    Siew Ann Cheong
    Peter M. A. Sloot
    The European Physical Journal B, 2014, 87
  • [24] An empirical evaluation of spatial regression models
    Gao, Xiaolu
    Asami, Yasushi
    Chung, Chang-Jo F.
    COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2006, 32 (08) : 1040 - 1051
  • [25] An Empirical Evaluation of Models of Programmer Navigation
    Singh, Alka
    Henley, Austin Z.
    Fleming, Scott D.
    Luong, Maria V.
    32ND IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE AND EVOLUTION (ICSME 2016), 2016, : 9 - 19
  • [26] Disease mapping models: an empirical evaluation
    Lawson, AB
    Biggeri, AB
    Boehning, D
    Lesaffre, E
    Viel, JF
    Clark, A
    Schlattmann, P
    Divino, F
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2000, 19 (17-18) : 2217 - 2241
  • [27] Quantitative comparison between crowd models for evacuation planning and evaluation
    Viswanathan, Vaisagh
    Lee, Chong Eu
    Lees, Michael Harold
    Cheong, Siew Ann
    Sloot, Peter M. A.
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL B, 2014, 87 (02):
  • [28] An Empirical Evaluation of GPGPU Performance Models
    Madougou, Souley
    Varbanescu, Ana Lucia
    de Laat, Cees
    van Nieuwpoort, Rob
    EURO-PAR 2014: PARALLEL PROCESSING WORKSHOPS, PT I, 2014, 8805 : 165 - 176
  • [29] Evaluation of computational models for hemolysis estimation
    Gu, L
    Smith, WA
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2005, 51 (03) : 202 - 207
  • [30] Empirical evaluation of bureaucratic models of inefficiency
    Duncombe, W
    Miner, J
    Ruggiero, J
    PUBLIC CHOICE, 1997, 93 (1-2) : 1 - 18