Effect of RANS Turbulence Model on Aerodynamic Behavior of Trains in Crosswind

被引:0
|
作者
Tian Li
Deng Qin
Jiye Zhang
机构
[1] Southwest Jiaotong University,State Key Laboratory of Traction Power
关键词
Turbulence model; Crosswind; High speed train; Numerical simulation; Aerodynamic;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The numerical simulation based on Reynolds time-averaged equation is one of the approved methods to evaluate the aerodynamic performance of trains in crosswind. However, there are several turbulence models, trains may present different aerodynamic performances in crosswind using different turbulence models. In order to select the most suitable turbulence model, the inter-city express 2 (ICE2) model is chosen as a research object, 6 different turbulence models are used to simulate the flow characteristics, surface pressure and aerodynamic forces of the train in crosswind, respectively. 6 turbulence models are the standard k-ε, Renormalization Group (RNG) k-ε, Realizable k-ε, Shear Stress Transport (SST) k-ω, standard k-ω and Spalart–Allmaras (SPA), respectively. The numerical results and the wind tunnel experimental data are compared. The results show that the most accurate model for predicting the surface pressure of the train is SST k-ω, followed by Realizable k-ε. Compared with the experimental result, the error of the side force coefficient obtained by SST k-ω and Realizable k-ε turbulence model is less than 1 %. The most accurate prediction for the lift force coefficient is achieved by SST k-ω, followed by RNG k-ε. By comparing 6 different turbulence models, the SST k-ω model is most suitable for the numerical simulation of the aerodynamic behavior of trains in crosswind.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The effect of turbulence on mass transfer in solid fuel combustion: RANS model
    Karchniwy, Ewa
    Haugen, Nils Erland L.
    Klimanek, Adam
    Langorgen, Oyvind
    Sladek, Slawomir
    COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2021, 227 : 65 - 78
  • [22] Aerodynamic influences of bogie's geometric complexity on high-speed trains under crosswind
    Guo, Zijian
    Liu, Tanghong
    Chen, Zhengwei
    Xia, Yutao
    Li, Wenhui
    Li, Li
    JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2020, 196
  • [23] Numerical comparison of aerodynamic performance of stationary and moving trains with or without windbreak wall under crosswind
    Niu, Jiqiang
    Zhou, Dan
    Wang, Yueming
    JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2018, 182 : 1 - 15
  • [24] Effect of train smoothing on the aerodynamic characteristic under crosswind
    Liang, Xifeng
    Zou, Yong
    Liu, Hongkang
    Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2022, 19 (09) : 2498 - 2506
  • [25] Turbulence Model Behavior in Low Reynolds Number Regions of Aerodynamic Flowfields
    Rumsey, Christopher L.
    Spalart, Philippe R.
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2009, 47 (04) : 982 - 993
  • [26] Aerodynamic Response Analysis of High-Speed Trains Passing through High Platforms under Crosswind
    Du, L. M.
    Bian, J.
    Zhang, P.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED FLUID MECHANICS, 2022, 15 (05) : 1525 - 1543
  • [27] Optimization on the Crosswind Stability of Trains Using Neural Network Surrogate Model
    Le Zhang
    Tian Li
    Jiye Zhang
    Ronghuan Piao
    Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2021, 34 (04) : 219 - 235
  • [28] Optimization on the Crosswind Stability of Trains Using Neural Network Surrogate Model
    Zhang, Le
    Li, Tian
    Zhang, Jiye
    Piao, Ronghuan
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 34 (01)
  • [29] THE EFFECT OF ATMOSPHERIC-TURBULENCE ON TRAINS
    ROBINSON, CG
    BAKER, CJ
    JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 1990, 34 (03) : 251 - 272
  • [30] Optimization on the Crosswind Stability of Trains Using Neural Network Surrogate Model
    Le Zhang
    Tian Li
    Jiye Zhang
    Ronghuan Piao
    Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2021, 34