Stakeholder Management Theory, Firm Strategy, and Ambidexterity

被引:0
|
作者
Mario Minoja
机构
[1] University of Modena and Reggio Emilia,Department of Communication and Economics
[2] Bocconi University,Department of Management and Technology
来源
Journal of Business Ethics | 2012年 / 109卷
关键词
Ambidexterity; Dynamic approach; Ethics; Firm strategy; Integration; Stakeholder management;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Stakeholder theory scholars have recently addressed two crucial calls: the first is for the integration of strategy and ethics, of stakeholder theory and strategic management, and the second call is for the development of a dynamic approach to stakeholder management. I have attempted to answer these calls by developing a theoretical framework that links together stakeholder management, stakeholder commitment to cooperate with the firm, key decision makers’ ethical commitment, and firm strategy. Starting from the basic assumption that managers cannot meet all stakeholders’ demands immediately and in a tailored manner, I contend, first, that an ambidextrous approach to stakeholder management is conducive to stakeholders’ commitment to cooperate for the sustainable well-being of the firm and, second, that firm strategy and key decision makers’ ethical commitment moderate the relationship between an ambidextrous stakeholder management and stakeholder commitment to cooperate. Furthermore, drawing on this theoretical framework, I attempt to address the call for the integration of strategy and ethics by proposing a three-level conceptual model that distinguishes the objectives, the field, and the levers of integration. Finally, I outline a set of propositions that, taken together, represent a first attempt to develop a dynamic approach to stakeholder management.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 82
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] STRATEGY, MANAGEMENT DESIGN AND FIRM PERFORMANCE
    HOROVITZ, JH
    THIETART, RA
    STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1982, 3 (01) : 67 - 76
  • [32] Environmental Management Systems and Firm Performance: Improving Firm Environmental Policy through Stakeholder Engagement
    Martin-de Castro, Gregorio
    Amores-Salvado, Javier
    Navas-Lopez, Jose E.
    CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 23 (04) : 243 - 256
  • [33] Employee treatment and firm leverage: A test of the stakeholder theory of capital structure
    Bae, Kee-Hong
    Kang, Jun-Koo
    Wang, Jin
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 100 (01) : 130 - 153
  • [34] Contractors as stakeholders: Reconciling stakeholder theory with the nexus-of-contracts firm
    Boatright, JR
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2002, 26 (09) : 1837 - 1852
  • [35] A Multilevel Integrated Framework of Firm HR Practices, Individual Ambidexterity, and Organizational Ambidexterity
    Mom, Tom J. M.
    Chang, Yi-Ying
    Cholakova, Magdalena
    Jansen, Justin J. P.
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2019, 45 (07) : 3009 - 3034
  • [36] A balance theory approach to stakeholder network and apology strategy
    Yang, Aimei
    Bentley, Josh
    PUBLIC RELATIONS REVIEW, 2017, 43 (02) : 267 - 277
  • [37] Stakeholder theory, strategy, and organization: Past, present, and future
    Bridoux, Flore
    Stoelhorst, J. W.
    STRATEGIC ORGANIZATION, 2022, 20 (04) : 797 - 809
  • [38] Corporate Strategy and the Theory of the Firm in the Digital Age
    Menz, Markus
    Kunisch, Sven
    Birkinshaw, Julian
    Collis, David J.
    Foss, Nicolai J.
    Hoskisson, Robert E.
    Prescott, John E.
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2021, 58 (07) : 1695 - 1720
  • [39] Incorporating firm strategy into development theory and policy
    Shapiro, H
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC HISTORY, 2004, 64 (02): : 595 - 595
  • [40] Tool set for stakeholder management: Theory and practice
    Ellmann, Sonja
    Meyer, Mey Mark
    Dworatschek, Sebastian
    Weitlaner, Erwin
    Proceedings of 20th IPMA World Congress on Project Management, Vols 1 and 2, 2006, : 836 - 846