Surgeon variations in the perioperative evaluation of penile prosthesis patients

被引:3
|
作者
Barham, David W. [1 ]
Chen, Irene K. [2 ]
Reeves, Aubrey [3 ]
Chung, Eric [4 ]
Reisman, Yacov [5 ]
Gross, Martin S. [6 ]
Yafi, Faysal A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Urol, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[2] Wayne State Univ, Detroit, MI USA
[3] Calif Univ Sci & Med, Colton, CA USA
[4] Univ Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[5] Amstelland Hosp, Amstelveen, Netherlands
[6] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Lebanon, NH 03766 USA
关键词
SEXUAL HEALTH INVENTORY; SATISFACTION;
D O I
10.1038/s41443-021-00521-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The objective of this study is to characterize the standard perioperative practices of penile prosthetic surgeons. A 24-question survey was sent to prosthetic urologists which assessed surgeon demographic and practice information, preoperative evaluation including assessment of sexual history, and postoperative assessment. The majority of surveyed penile implant surgeons (87.0%) assess patients' grip strength before surgery and 96.5% discuss patients' expectations before surgery. Less than half (42.6%) ask patients about their sexual orientation. Only 49.6% obtain a psychiatric history but 68.7% evaluate the impact of sexual function on patient self-esteem. A minority (35.5%) ask about the intended use of the implant and 63.5% commonly ask about partner sexual function. Few (26.1%) implanters regularly ask about the type of sexual activity patients engage in (i.e., oral, vaginal, anal). Postoperatively, 95.6% of implanters ask about patient satisfaction but only 67.2% routinely assess partner satisfaction. Only 18.6% of implant surgeons use a questionnaire to evaluate postoperative satisfaction. Penile prosthetic urologists can improve the consistency of assessment of patients' sexual orientation, intended use of the implant, type of sexual activity, and partner sexual function and satisfaction.
引用
收藏
页码:152 / 156
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] EVALUATION OF PATIENTS AND PARTNERS 1 TO 4 YEARS AFTER PENILE PROSTHESIS SURGERY
    PEDERSEN, B
    TIEFER, L
    RUIZ, M
    MELMAN, A
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1988, 139 (05): : 956 - 958
  • [22] MAY A PERIOPERATIVE CHECKLIST REDUCE INFECTION RATE AFTER PENILE PROSTHESIS SURGERY?
    Gomez Palomo, F.
    Lujan Marco, S.
    Romeu Magraner, G.
    Bernal Gomez, A.
    Marzullo Zucchet, L. J.
    Lorenzo Soriano, L.
    Daga Martinez, O.
    Rogel Berto, R.
    Broseta Rico, E.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2019, 16 (05): : S70 - S71
  • [23] Perioperative infection prevention during inflatable penile prosthesis surgery: a narrative review
    Matthew-Onabanjo, Asia N.
    Matthew, Ashley N.
    Famati, Efemona
    Nguyen, Vy
    Rogers, Marc J.
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2024, 13 (08) : 1628 - 1640
  • [24] Perioperative outcomes of penile prosthesis implantation in Germany: results from the GRAND study
    Pyrgidis, Nikolaos
    Schulz, Gerald B.
    Chaloupka, Michael
    Volz, Yannic
    Pfitzinger, Paulo L.
    Rodler, Severin
    Berg, Elena
    Weinhold, Philipp
    Jokisch, Friedrich
    Stief, Christian G.
    Becker, Armin J.
    Marcon, Julian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPOTENCE RESEARCH, 2023, 36 (8) : 848 - 853
  • [25] PERIOPERATIVE MORBIDITY OF PENILE PROSTHESIS PLACEMENT WITH CONCURRENT SURGERY. A NATIONAL REPORT
    Raheem, Omer
    Khalil, Mahmoud I.
    Acharya, Mahip
    Payakachat, Nalin
    Machado, Bruno
    Yousef, Ayad
    Davis, Rodney
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E577 - E577
  • [26] PENILE PROSTHESIS
    AMER, M
    ARVIS, G
    GAZETTE MEDICALE, 1991, 98 (34): : 41 - &
  • [27] INFLATABLE PENILE PROSTHESIS - EXPERIENCE WITH 100 PATIENTS
    CARSON, CC
    SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1983, 76 (09) : 1139 - 1141
  • [28] SUCCESS WITH PENILE PROSTHESIS FROM PATIENTS VIEWPOINT
    HOLLANDER, JB
    DIOKNO, AC
    UROLOGY, 1984, 23 (02) : 141 - 143
  • [29] EXPERIENCE WITH THE HYDROFLEX PENILE PROSTHESIS IN 100 PATIENTS
    MULCAHY, JJ
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1987, 137 (04): : A231 - A231
  • [30] Penile prosthesis
    Kaspar, C.
    Henkel, A.
    UROLOGE, 2021, 60 (06): : 714 - 721