Response to Protocol Review Scenario: Needs IACUC oversight

被引：0

|

作者：

Hillary Herendeen

Gillian Braden-Weiss

Breanna Caltagarone

机构：

[1] Herendeen,

[2] Braden-Weiss and Caltagarone are students at the University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine,undefined

[3] Philadelphia,undefined

[4] PA.,undefined

来源：

Lab Animal | 2009年 / 38卷 / 6期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1038/laban0609-187

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：187 / 187

相关论文

共 50 条

[31] Response to Protocol Review Scenario: Federal oversight needed
Sheila S. Donohue
Lab Animal, 2009, 38 (3) : 78 - 79
[32] Response to Protocol Review Scenario: IACUC-IRB Cooperation Needed
Harry Fyke
Lab Animal, 2003, 32 : 19 - 20
[33] Response to Protocol Review Scenario: IACUC approval for the sake of prudence, not welfare
Kelly Jensen
Lab Animal, 2017, 46 (6) : 238 - 238
[34] Response to Protocol Review Scenario: IACUC in a Bind Thanks to Lack of Information
Stacy Pritt
J. Fred Nostrant
Lab Animal, 2004, 33 (1) : 17 - 18
[35] Response to Protocol Review Scenario: Solid advice from the IACUC chair
James F. Taylor
Lab Animal, 2012, 41 (7) : 189 - 190
[36] Response to Protocol Review Scenario: No IACUC approval necessary, but inspect potential risks
Lori R Hill
Lab Animal, 2017, 46 (6) : 237 - 238
[37] Response to Protocol Review Scenario: An IACUC reviews much more than training
David Lyons
Paula Means
Richard Young
Colleen Bennett
Lab Animal, 2016, 45 (6) : 210 - 210
[38] Response to Protocol Review Scenario: More oversight and communication might be needed
Julie Fitzgerald
Lab Animal, 2016, 45 : 355 - 355
[39] Response to Protocol Review Scenario: Needs more planning
Stephen J. Durkee
Matthew Philpott
Lab Animal, 2010, 39 (4) : 98 - 98
[40] Field studies and the IACUC: protocol review, oversight, and occupational health and safety considerations
Laber, Kathy
Kennedy, Bruce W.
Young, Larry
LAB ANIMAL, 2007, 36 (01) : 27 - 33

← 1 2 3 4 5 →