Quality assurance for diffusion tensor imaging using an ACR phantom: Comparative analysis with 6, 15, and 32 directions at 1.5T and 3.0T MRI systems

被引:0
|
作者
Jung-Hoon Lee
Sang-Young Kim
Do-Wan Lee
Jin-Young Jung
Kyu-Ho Song
Bo-Young Choe
机构
[1] College of Medicine,Department of Biomedical Engineering, Research Institute of Biomedical Engineering
[2] The Catholic University of Korea,Department of Radiology
[3] Kyunghee Medical Center,undefined
来源
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Diffusion tensor imaging; ACR MRI phantom;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Although diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has been widely used for the quantitative analyses of the integrity of white matter in the brain in clinical and research fields, quality assurance (QA) for DTI has not been fully established. Thus, we suggest a QA guideline for DTI using the American College of Radiology (ACR) Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) head phantom. In this study, the geometric accuracy, slice-position accuracy, image intensity uniformity, percent signalghosting, low-contrast object detectability, image distortion, fractional anisotropy (FA), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were measured and evaluated in 1.5T and 3.0T MRI scanners equipped with an 8-channel SENSE head coil. The standard axial spin echo (SE) T1-weighted MR images and DTI with 6, 15 and 32 directions were obtained. Concerning geometric accuracy, image twisting in the three directions was observed due to the inhomogeneity of echo planar imaging (EPI). Image intensity uniformity was significantly lower for DTI than for the standard SE T1-weighted MR images. Percent signal ghosting was higher for images from 3.0T MRI than for images from 1.5T MRI. Low-contrast object detectability was visually identified and measured at a low contrasttonoise ratio (CNR) and a low signaltonoise ratio (SNR). Image distortion changed remarkably to the phaseencoding direction. The present study using the ACR MRI phantom suggests a QA method for DTI with high reproducibility and easy accessibility.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 110
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [31] Quantitative comparison of MR diffusion-weighted imaging for liver focal lesions between 3.0T and 1.5T: Regions of interest of the minimum-spot ADC, the largest possible solid part, and the maximum diameter in lesions
    Tang, Yanhua
    Wang, Haiyi
    Wang, Yingwei
    Li, Jie
    Jia, Rui
    Ma, Lu
    Ye, Huiyi
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2016, 44 (05) : 1320 - 1329
  • [32] Using the ACR CT accreditation phantom for routine image quality assurance on both CT and CBCT imaging systems in a radiotherapy environment (vol 15, pg 226, 2014)
    Hobson, M. A.
    Soisson, E. T.
    Davis, S. D.
    Parker, W.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 15 (06): : 362 - 362
  • [33] Utility of Histogram Analysis of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Maps Obtained Using 3.0T MRI for Distinguishing Uterine Carcinosarcoma From Endometrial Carcinoma
    Takahashi, Masahiro
    Kozawa, Eito
    Tanisaka, Megumi
    Hasegawa, Kousei
    Yasuda, Masanori
    Sakai, Fumikazu
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2016, 43 (06) : 1301 - 1307
  • [34] Distinguishing liver haemangiomas from metastatic tumours using gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced diffusion-weighted imaging at 1.5T MRI
    Saito, Kazuhiro
    Yoshimura, Nobutaka
    Shirota, Natsuhiko
    Saguchi, Toru
    Sugimoto, Katsutoshi
    Tokuuye, Koichi
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2016, 60 (05) : 599 - 606
  • [35] Shortening Acquisition Time and Improving Image Quality for Pelvic MRI Using Deep Learning Reconstruction for Diffusion-Weighted Imaging at 1.5 T
    Herrmann, Judith
    Benkert, Thomas
    Brendlin, Andreas
    Gassenmaier, Sebastian
    Hoelldobler, Thomas
    Maennlin, Simon
    Almansour, Haidara
    Lingg, Andreas
    Weiland, Elisabeth
    Afat, Saif
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2024, 31 (03) : 921 - 928
  • [36] Image Quality and Focal Lesion Detectability Analysis of Multiband Variable-Rate Selective Excitation Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Liver Using 3.0-T MRI
    Yoon, Ja Kyung
    Chung, Yong Eun
    Shin, Jaeseung
    Kim, Eunju
    Seo, Nieun
    Choi, Jin-Young
    Park, Mi-Suk
    Kim, Myeong-Jin
    INVESTIGATIVE MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2024, 28 (01) : 8 - 17
  • [37] Image quality assessment of a 1.5T dedicated magnetic resonance-simulator for radiotherapy with a flexible radio frequency coil setting using the standard American College of Radiology magnetic resonance imaging phantom test
    Wong, Oi Lei
    Yuan, Jing
    Yu, Siu Ki
    Cheung, Kin Yin
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2017, 7 (02) : 205 - 214
  • [38] Advances of 3T MR Imaging in Visualizing Trabecular Bone Structure of the Calcaneus Are Partially SNR-Independent: Analysis Using Simulated Noise in Relation to Micro-CT, 1.5T MRI, and Biomechanical Strength
    Bauer, Jan S.
    Monetti, Roberto
    Krug, Roland
    Matsuura, Maiko
    Mueller, Dirk
    Eckstein, Felix
    Rummeny, Ernst J.
    Lochmueller, Eva-Maria
    Raeth, Christoph W.
    Link, Thomas M.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2009, 29 (01) : 132 - 140
  • [39] Prediction of high-stage liver fibrosis using ADC value on diffusion-weighted imaging and quantitative enhancement ratio at the hepatobiliary phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI at 1.5T
    Harada, Taiyo L.
    Saito, Kazuhiro
    Araki, Yoichi
    Matsubayashi, Jun
    Nagao, Toshitaka
    Sugimoto, Katsutoshi
    Tokuuye, Koichi
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2018, 59 (05) : 509 - 516