Methods and applications of DEA cross-efficiency: Review and future perspectives

被引:0
|
作者
Jie Wu
Jiasen Sun
Liang Liang
机构
[1] University of Science and Technology of China,School of Management
[2] Soochow University,Business School
[3] Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,College of Economics and Management
[4] Hefei University of Technology,School of Management
来源
关键词
cross-efficiency evaluation; efficiency; secondary goal model; aggregation; review;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The field of engineering management usually involves evaluation issues, such as program selection, team performance evaluation, technology selection, and supplier evaluation. The traditional self-evaluation data envelopment analysis (DEA) method usually exaggerates the effects of several inputs or outputs of the evaluated decision-making unit (DMU), resulting in unrealistic results. To address this problem, scholars have proposed the cross-efficiency evaluation (CREE) method. Compared with the DEA method, CREE can rank DMUs more completely by using reasonable weights. With the extensive application of this technique, several problems, such as non-unique weights and non-Pareto optimal results, have arisen in CREE methods. Therefore, the improvement of CREE has attracted the attention of many scholars. This paper reviews the theory and applications of CREE, including the non-uniqueness problem, the aggregation of cross-efficiency data, and applications in engineering management. It also discusses the directions for future research on CREE.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 211
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Determination of cross-efficiency considering the original efficiency value of DMUs in DEA cross-evaluation
    Liu, Peng
    Wang, Li-Fang
    IAENG International Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2019, 49 (02) : 1 - 7
  • [32] Evaluation of commercial trainer effectiveness based on DEA cross-efficiency model
    Yu Fen
    Zhang Wei-gang
    Liu Li-wen
    Xu Hang
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LOGISTICS, ENGINEERING, MANAGEMENT AND COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2014, 101 : 588 - 591
  • [33] Embracing fairness within a cross-efficiency hierarchical network DEA system
    Xiao, Siwei
    Kremantzis, Marios Dominikos
    Kyrgiakos, Leonidas Sotirios
    Vlontzos, George
    Pardalos, Panos M.
    OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [34] DEA cross-efficiency evaluation and ranking method based on interval data
    Yu Yu
    Weiwei Zhu
    Qian Zhang
    Annals of Operations Research, 2019, 278 : 159 - 175
  • [35] DEA cross-efficiency aggregation method based upon Shannon entropy
    Wu, Jie
    Sun, Jiasen
    Liang, Liang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2012, 50 (23) : 6726 - 6736
  • [36] A DEA Game Cross-Efficiency Model with Loss Aversion for Contractor Selection
    Huang, Huixia
    Zhou, Chi
    Deng, Hepu
    MATHEMATICS, 2024, 12 (10)
  • [37] Embracing fairness within a cross-efficiency hierarchical network DEA system
    Siwei Xiao
    Marios Dominikos Kremantzis
    Leonidas Sotirios Kyrgiakos
    George Vlontzos
    Panos M. Pardalos
    Operational Research, 2024, 24
  • [38] An Improvement of DEA Cross-Efficiency Aggregation Based on BWM-TOPSIS
    Fan, Jian-Ping
    Guo, Zi-Wei
    Wu, Mei-Qin
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 (08): : 37334 - 37342
  • [39] Selecting symmetric weights as a secondary goal in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation
    Jahanshahloo, G. R.
    Lotfi, F. Hosseinzadeh
    Jafari, Y.
    Maddahi, R.
    APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2011, 35 (01) : 544 - 549
  • [40] DEA cross-efficiency evaluation and ranking method based on interval data
    Yu, Yu
    Zhu, Weiwei
    Zhang, Qian
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2019, 278 (1-2) : 159 - 175