Identification of newborns with Fetal Growth Restriction (FGR) in weight and/or length based on constitutional growth potential

被引:0
|
作者
Nicole Mamelle
Magali Boniol
Olivier Rivière
Marie O. Joly
Georges Mellier
Bernard Maria
Bernard Rousset
Olivier Claris
机构
[1] Faculté de Médecine Laennec,UMR 369 INSERM / Claude Bernard University
[2] Faculté de Médecine Laennec,Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology Unit – and IFR62, Research group: Epidemiology of growth and development
[3] AUDIVAL,AUDIPOG (Association des utilisateurs de dossiers informatisés en pédiatrie, obstétrique et gynécologie)
[4] Laboratoire central d'anatomie pathologique,undefined
[5] Hôpital Edouard Herriot,undefined
[6] Department of obstetrics and gynaecology,undefined
[7] Hôpital Edouard Herriot,undefined
[8] Department of Neonatology,undefined
[9] Hôpital Edouard Herriot,undefined
[10] UMR 369 INSERM / UCLB – Equipe Epidémiologie,undefined
[11] Faculté de Médecine Lyon – R.T.H. Laennec,undefined
来源
关键词
FGR; Constitutional growth potential; Growth factors; Gravidic hypertension; Long term outcome;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study was carried out to build statistical models for defining FGR (Fetal Growth Restriction) in weight and/or length after taking growth potential of an infant into account. From a cohort of pregnant women having given birth to 47,733 infants in 141 French maternity units, two statistical models gave individualized limits of birth weight and birth length (based on the 5th centile) below which, after adjustment for its individual growth potential, a newborn must be considered as FGR in weight and/or in length. A sample of 906 infants had measures taken of cord blood growth factors (IGF1, IGFBP3). The FGRW definition (weight<5th centile for growth potential) permitted the identification of infants who presented rates of maternal hypertension (13.6%) and of Apgar score at 5 min<6 (2.9%) higher than in the classical group SGAW (weight<5th centile for sex and gestational age) (9.6% and 2.2% respectively). By combining FGRW and SGAW, a subgroup of infants, not currently recognized as SGA, presented very high rates of maternal hypertension (19.9%) and of low Apgar score (3.9%). Conversely a subgroup of infants, currently recognized as SGAW, had rates as low as in the normal infants group, and had to be considered as “constitutionally small” (that is to say 24% of the SGAW). Combining FGRW and FGRL (length<5th centile of growth potential), 7.6% of infants appeared growth-restricted, and 1.8% appeared constitutionally small in weight and/or in length. The FGRW–FGRL infants showed the lowest mean values of IGF1 (126.2±3.2) and IGFBP3 (0.86±0.03). These new definitions of FGRW and FGRL could help to better identify infants at birth requiring neonatal care, and monitoring of growth catch-up and neurodevelopmental outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:717 / 725
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Is cerebellar vermis size affected in the setting of fetal growth restriction (FGR)?
    Hamidi, Odessa P.
    Driver, Camille
    Fought, Angela J.
    Steller, Jon G.
    Gumina, Diane
    Reeves, Shane
    Galan, Henry L.
    Hobbins, John
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (01) : S704 - S705
  • [22] Role of ADAMTS5 in Unexplained Fetal Growth Restriction (FGR)
    Ozler, Sibel
    Oztas, Efser
    Guler, Basak Gumus
    Pehlivan, Sultan
    Kadioglu, Nezaket
    Ergin, Merve
    Uygur, Dilek
    Danisman, Nuri
    FETAL AND PEDIATRIC PATHOLOGY, 2016, 35 (04) : 220 - 230
  • [23] Integrated fetal testing predicts all unexpected stillbirths in fetal growth restriction (FGR)
    Baschat, Ahmet
    Turan, Ozhan
    Berg, Christoph
    Turan, Sifa
    Moyan, Dolores
    Bhide, Amarnath
    Thilaganathan, Baskaran
    Bower, Sarah
    Galan, Henry
    Gembruch, Ulrich
    Nicolaides, Kypros
    Harman, Christopher
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 197 (06) : S180 - S180
  • [24] Fetal growth restriction (FGR) modifies vascular growth and smooth muscle (VSM) maturation.
    Rosenfeld, CR
    Liu, XT
    McMillen, C
    JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR GYNECOLOGIC INVESTIGATION, 2004, 11 (02) : 303A - 303A
  • [25] Fetal Growth Restriction (FGR): How the Differences Between Early and Late FGR Impact on Clinical Management?
    Monaghan, Caitriona
    Thilaganathan, Baskaran
    JOURNAL OF FETAL MEDICINE, 2016, 3 (03) : 101 - 107
  • [26] Maternal Nutrient Restriction (MNR) in the Baboon Results in Fetal Hypoxia Prior to the Development of Fetal Growth Restriction (FGR).
    Kakadia, Jenica H.
    Li, Cun
    Nathanielsz, Peter W.
    Jansson, Thomas
    Gupta, Madhulika B.
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2020, 27 (SUPPL 1) : 323A - 324A
  • [27] Validation of the Delphi Procedure Consensus criteria for defining Fetal Growth Restriction (FGR)
    Molina, Lara
    Odibo, Linda
    Zientara, Sara
    Obican, Sarah
    Rodriguez, Alejandro
    Stout, Molly
    Odibo, Anthony
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (01) : S157 - S157
  • [28] Placental proteome in late-onset of fetal growth restriction (late FGR)
    Geca, Tomasz
    Stupak, Aleksandra
    Nawrot, Robert
    Gozdzicka-Jozefiak, Anna
    Kwasniewska, Anna
    Kwasniewski, Wojciech
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2024, 293 : 185 - 186
  • [29] Neuroimaging and neurodevelopmental outcome after early fetal growth restriction: NEUROPROJECT—FGR
    Gloria Brembilla
    Andrea Righini
    Barbara Scelsa
    Gianluca Lista
    Marina Balestriero
    Elena Cesari
    Francesca Maria Castoldi
    Martina Di Stasi
    Chiara Ciardi
    Elisa Ligato
    Emanuela Taricco
    Irene Cetin
    Pediatric Research, 2021, 90 : 869 - 875
  • [30] Fetuses with fetal growth restriction (FGR) have elevated proteasome levels and activity
    Sutherland, Monique B.
    Buhimschi, Catalin S.
    Zhao, Guomao
    Fagla, Bani Medegan
    Buhimschi, Irina A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (01) : S36 - S36