Donation Payment Mechanisms and Contingent Valuation: An Empirical Study of Hypothetical Bias

被引:0
|
作者
Patricia A. Champ
Richard C. Bishop
机构
[1] USDA Forest Service,Rocky Mountain Research Station
[2] University of Wisconsin,Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics
来源
Environmental and Resource Economics | 2001年 / 19卷
关键词
actual donations; calibration; contingent donations; contingent valuation; hypothetical bias; uncertainty;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Donation payment mechanisms are well suited forsome contingent valuation studies. In aneffort to better understand the discrepancythat has been consistently found between actualand hypothetical donations, we investigate anapproach to estimating actual willingness todonate using contingent donations with afollow-up question in which respondents ratethe level of certainty about their response tothe contingent donation question. The approachallows us to estimate the magnitude of thehypothetical bias and identify the respondentsresponsible for the bias. Identification ofthe respondents responsible for thehypothetical bias is the first step towarddeveloping an understanding of the causes andpossible remedies. In this study we find thatmost of the respondents (80%) to thecontingent donation question provide a responseconsistent with how we predict they wouldrespond in an actual donation situation.
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 402
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cultural bias in contingent valuation of copper mining in the Commonwealth of Dominica
    Pemberton, Carlisle A.
    Harris-Charles, Emaline
    Patterson-Andrews, Hazel
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 70 (01) : 19 - 23
  • [42] Optimal contingent payment mechanisms and entrepreneurial financing decisions
    Tavares-Gaertner, Miguel
    Pereira, Paulo J.
    Brandao, Elisio
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2018, 270 (03) : 1182 - 1194
  • [43] Willingness-to-pay for improvement of hypothetical health status in patients visiting the emergency department: A contingent valuation study
    Seyedin, Hesam
    Safari, Mehdi
    Parnian, Elaheh
    CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GLOBAL HEALTH, 2020, 8 (01): : 66 - 69
  • [44] Hypothetical Bias Reconsidered: Payment and Provision Uncertainties in a Threshold Provision Mechanism
    Mitani, Yohei
    Flores, Nicholas E.
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2014, 59 (03): : 433 - 454
  • [45] Hypothetical Bias Reconsidered: Payment and Provision Uncertainties in a Threshold Provision Mechanism
    Yohei Mitani
    Nicholas E. Flores
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 2014, 59 : 433 - 454
  • [46] Treating respondent uncertainty in contingent valuation: A comparison of empirical treatments
    Shaikh, Sabina L.
    Sun, Lili
    van Kooten, G. Cornelis
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 62 (01) : 115 - 125
  • [47] The Exxon Valdes contingent valuation study
    Turner, RK
    Bateman, IJ
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2003, 25 (03): : 255 - 256
  • [48] DEMAND-BASED AND CONTINGENT VALUATION - AN EMPIRICAL-COMPARISON
    HOEHN, JP
    RANDALL, A
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1985, 67 (05) : 1284 - 1284
  • [49] Valuation of environmental goods: Correcting for bias in contingent valuation studies based on willingness-to-accept
    Goldar, B
    Misra, S
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 83 (01) : 150 - 156
  • [50] Valuing a Hypothetical Cure for Rheumatoid Arthritis Using the Contingent Valuation Methodology: The Patient Perspective
    Fautrel, Bruno
    Clarke, Ann E.
    Guillemin, Francis
    Adam, Viviane
    St-Pierre, Yvan
    Panaritis, Tina
    Fortin, Paul R.
    Menard, Henri A.
    Donaldson, Cam
    Penrod, John R.
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2005, 32 (03) : 443 - 453