Donation Payment Mechanisms and Contingent Valuation: An Empirical Study of Hypothetical Bias

被引:0
|
作者
Patricia A. Champ
Richard C. Bishop
机构
[1] USDA Forest Service,Rocky Mountain Research Station
[2] University of Wisconsin,Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics
来源
关键词
actual donations; calibration; contingent donations; contingent valuation; hypothetical bias; uncertainty;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Donation payment mechanisms are well suited forsome contingent valuation studies. In aneffort to better understand the discrepancythat has been consistently found between actualand hypothetical donations, we investigate anapproach to estimating actual willingness todonate using contingent donations with afollow-up question in which respondents ratethe level of certainty about their response tothe contingent donation question. The approachallows us to estimate the magnitude of thehypothetical bias and identify the respondentsresponsible for the bias. Identification ofthe respondents responsible for thehypothetical bias is the first step towarddeveloping an understanding of the causes andpossible remedies. In this study we find thatmost of the respondents (80%) to thecontingent donation question provide a responseconsistent with how we predict they wouldrespond in an actual donation situation.
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 402
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Donation payment mechanisms and contingent valuation: An empirical study of hypothetical bias
    Champ, PA
    Bishop, RC
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2001, 19 (04): : 383 - 402
  • [2] Evidence of range bias in contingent valuation payment scales
    Whynes, DK
    Wolstenholme, JL
    Frew, E
    HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2004, 13 (02) : 183 - 190
  • [3] Minimising Payment Vehicle Bias in Contingent Valuation Studies
    M. D. Morrison
    R. K. Blamey
    J. W. Bennett
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 2000, 16 : 407 - 422
  • [4] Minimising payment vehicle bias in contingent valuation studies
    Morrison, MD
    Blamey, RK
    Bennett, JW
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2000, 16 (04): : 407 - 422
  • [5] A learning design for reducing hypothetical bias in the contingent valuation method
    Bjornstad, David
    Cummings, Ronald
    Osborne, Laura
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 1997, 10 (03): : 207 - 221
  • [6] Experimental results on expressed certainty and hypothetical bias in contingent valuation
    Blumenschein, K
    Johannesson, M
    Blomquist, GC
    Liljas, B
    O'Conor, RM
    SOUTHERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1998, 65 (01) : 169 - 177
  • [7] A learning design for reducing hypothetical bias in the contingent valuation method
    Bjornstad D.
    Cummings R.
    Osborne L.
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 1997, 10 (3) : 207 - 221
  • [8] Further tests of entreaties to avoid hypothetical bias in referendum contingent valuation
    Brown, TC
    Ajzen, I
    Hrubes, D
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 46 (02) : 353 - 361
  • [9] HYPOTHETICAL BIAS, RISK ATTITUDES AND PREFERENCE UNCERTAINTY IN CONTINGENT VALUATION STUDIES
    Costa Pinto, Ligia M.
    Silva, Sael
    Valente, Marieta
    4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PRODUCTION ECONOMICS AND PROJECT EVALUATION (ICOPEV 2018), 2018, : 168 - 171
  • [10] Testing the effectiveness of the oath script in reducing the hypothetical bias in the Contingent Valuation Method
    De-Magistris, Tiziana
    Akaichi, Faical
    Ben Youssef, Kamel
    AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-ZEMEDELSKA EKONOMIKA, 2016, 62 (08): : 378 - 384