The obesity paradox in beyond total mesorectal excision surgery for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Daniel L. H. Baird
Constantinos Simillis
Gianluca Pellino
Christos Kontovounisios
Shahnawaz Rasheed
Paris P. Tekkis
机构
[1] The Royal Marsden Hospital,Department of Colorectal Surgery
[2] Imperial College London,Department of Surgery and Cancer
[3] Chelsea and Westminster Hospital,Department of Colorectal Surgery
来源
Updates in Surgery | 2019年 / 71卷
关键词
Rectal cancer; Beyond TME; Body Mass Index;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The objective is to investigate preoperative body mass index (BMI) in patients receiving beyond total mesorectal excision (bTME) surgery. The primary end point is length of postoperative stay. Secondary end points are length of intensive care stay, postoperative morbidity and overall survival. BMI is the most commonly used anthropometric measurement of nutrition and studies have shown that overweight and obese patients can have improved surgical outcomes. Patients who underwent a bTME operation for locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer were put into three BMI (kg/m2) groups of normal weight (18.5–24.9), overweight (25–29.9) and obese (≥ 30) for analysis. Included are 220 consecutive patients from a single centre. The overall length of stay, in days ± standard deviation (range), for normal weight, overweight and obese patients was 21.14 ± 16.4 (6–99), 15.24 ± 4.3 (7–32) and 19.10 ± 9.8 (8–62) respectively (p = 0.002). The mean ICU length of stay was 5.40 ± 9.1 (1–69), 3.37 ± 2.4 (0–19) and 3.60 ± 2.4 (1–14), respectively (p = 0.030). There was no significant difference between the three groups in terms of postoperative morbidity or overall survival. Patients with a normal weight BMI in this cohort have a significantly longer length of stay in ICU and in hospital than overweight or obese patients. This is seen with no significant difference in morbidity or overall survival.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 321
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] New perspectives in rectal cancer surgery: Transanal total mesorectal excision
    Papp Geza
    Banky Balazs
    Lakatos Miklos
    Svastics Imre
    Burany Akos
    Bursics Attila
    ORVOSI HETILAP, 2018, 159 (01) : 16 - 22
  • [42] Modern rectal cancer surgery - Total mesorectal excision The standard of care
    Grimm, Leander, Jr.
    Fleshman, James W.
    SEMINARS IN COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY, 2013, 24 (03) : 125 - 131
  • [43] Clinical nature and prognosis of locally recurrent rectal cancer after total mesorectal excision with or without preoperative radiotherapy
    van den Brink, M
    Stiggelbout, AM
    van den Hout, WB
    Kievit, J
    Kranenbarg, EK
    Marijnen, CAM
    Nagtegaal, ID
    Rutten, HJT
    Wiggers, T
    van de Velde, CJH
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (19) : 3958 - 3964
  • [44] Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision: Will It Be A Valid Alternative in Rectal Cancer Surgery?
    Chen, Wen-Hao
    Luo, Shuang-Ling
    Kang, Liang
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2017, 265 (04) : E36 - E37
  • [45] Total mesorectal excision is optimal surgery for rectal cancer: A Scandinavian consensus
    Newland, RC
    Chapuis, PH
    Dent, OF
    Bokey, EL
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 83 (03) : 427 - 428
  • [46] Impact of total mesorectal excision on the results of surgery of distal rectal cancer
    Law, WL
    Chu, KW
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 (12) : 1607 - 1612
  • [47] Surgery for rectal cancer — Results and implications of total mesorectal excision (TME)
    R. J. Heald
    Acta chirurgica Austriaca, 1997, 29 (2) : 102 - 102
  • [48] Total mesorectal excision - The new golden standard of surgery for rectal cancer
    Enker, WE
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE, 1997, 29 (02) : 127 - 133
  • [49] Selective total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer
    Leong, AFPK
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2000, 43 (09) : 1237 - 1240
  • [50] The technique of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer
    Nessar, Gurel
    Remzi, Feza H.
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 21 (04) : 206 - 209