Bisphenol A Affects Soybean Growth by Inhibiting Root Nodules and Germination

被引:0
|
作者
Ke Wang
Changjiang Huang
Jun Tang
Shuai Liu
Yuqing Miao
Yuntong Liu
Chuansheng Wu
机构
[1] Fuyang Normal University,Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Environmental Hormone and Reproduction, Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Embryo Development and Reproductive Regulation
[2] Anhui Normal University,School of Ecology and Environment
[3] Anhui Normal University,Anhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Regional Response in the Yangtze
[4] Yuxi Normal University,Huaihe River Basin, School of Geography and Tourism
来源
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution | 2023年 / 234卷
关键词
Biomass; BPA; Germination time; Rhizobia; Soil culture; Yield;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Bisphenol A (BPA) reportedly exerts concentration-dependent effects on plant growth, based on hydroponic exposure experiments. However, this pattern might differ in soil substrate, and the effects of different BPA concentrations in soil on crop germination as well as symbiotic relationship with rhizobia remain largely unclear. In this study, we evaluated the effects of different BPA concentrations (0, 10, 20, 40, 80, 160, and 320 mg/kg air-dry soil) on soybean growth index, germination, and root nodule by soil culture experiments. Results showed that low-dose BPA (10 mg/kg) treatment resulted in a 38.0 and 59.4% increase in total biomass and yield, respectively, while germination time was shortened by 10.1%. Conversely, high-dose BPA treatment significantly inhibited total biomass, yield, and germination time by an average of 39.9, 35.4, and 31.3% in 160 and 320 mg/kg, respectively. Root nodule biomass decreased in all BPA treatments, especially significantly decreased evenly by 66.6% in high concentrations of 160 and 320 mg/kg. Furthermore, germination time significantly explained variations of total biomass and yield by 19.2 and 18.3%, whereas nodule biomass significantly explained by 40.4 and 26.2%, respectively. The structural equation modeling revealed that BPA inhibited soybean total biomass and yield by prolonging germination time and inhibiting soybean nodule formation, while nodule biomass exhibited a larger path coefficient (0.553 and 0.475) than germination time (− 0.252 and − 0.280), suggesting a more important role of soybean nodule. Collectively, these findings provide invaluable insights into the mechanisms underlying the effects of BPA on crop growth.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comprehensive analysis of plant gene expression in soybean root nodules at different growth stages
    Kaewsuralikhit, S
    Yokoyama, T
    Kouchi, H
    Arima, Y
    SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT NUTRITION, 2005, 51 (04) : 535 - 547
  • [22] Isolation of plant-growth-promoting Bacillus strains from soybean root nodules
    Bai, YM
    D'Aoust, F
    Smith, DL
    Driscoll, BT
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, 2002, 48 (03) : 230 - 238
  • [23] RESPIRATORY METABOLISM OF MITOCHONDRIA IN SOYBEAN ROOT-NODULES
    SUGANUMA, N
    YAMAMOTO, Y
    SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT NUTRITION, 1987, 33 (01) : 93 - 101
  • [24] AMMONIA ASSIMILATORY ENZYMES IN SOYBEAN ROOT-NODULES
    SETHNA, PB
    MODI, VV
    BIOCHEMISTRY INTERNATIONAL, 1986, 12 (02): : 353 - 359
  • [25] ASCORBATE PEROXIDASE FROM SOYBEAN ROOT-NODULES
    CHATFIELD, M
    DALTON, DA
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1993, 103 (02) : 661 - 662
  • [26] Localization of H+-ATPases in soybean root nodules
    Elena Fedorova
    Rowena Thomson
    Lynne F. Whitehead
    Oliver Maudoux
    Michael K. Udvardi
    David A. Day
    Planta, 1999, 209 : 25 - 32
  • [27] VACUOLATION AND INFECTION THREAD IN ROOT-NODULES OF SOYBEAN
    BAL, AK
    CYTOBIOS, 1985, 42 (165) : 41 - 47
  • [28] Localization of H+ -ATPase in soybean root nodules
    Fedorova, E
    Thomson, R
    Whitehead, LF
    Maudoux, O
    Udvardi, MK
    Day, DA
    PLANTA, 1999, 209 (01) : 25 - 32
  • [29] REDUCTION OF FERRIC LEGHEMOGLOBIN IN SOYBEAN ROOT-NODULES
    LEE, K
    KLUCAS, RV
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1984, 74 (04) : 984 - 988
  • [30] ALDRIN EPOXIDASE FROM SOYBEAN ROOT-NODULES
    DENNIS, S
    KENNEDY, IR
    PHYTOCHEMISTRY, 1985, 24 (04) : 677 - 681