A review and comparison of hybrid and pull-type production control strategies

被引:4
|
作者
John Geraghty
Cathal Heavey
机构
[1] Dublin City University,School of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering
[2] University of Limerick,Department of Manufacturing and Operations Engineering
来源
OR Spectrum | 2005年 / 27卷
关键词
Hybrid Push/Pull; CONWIP/Pull; EKCS; BSCS; Kanban; Markov decision process; Discrete event simulation; Simulated annealing optimization algorithm;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In order to overcome the disadvantages of Kanban Control Strategy (KCS) in non-repetitive manufacturing environments, two research approaches have been followed in the literature in past two decades. The first approach has been concerned with developing new, or combining existing, pull-type production control strategies in order to maximise the benefits of pull control while increasing the ability of a production system to satisfy demand. The second approach has focused on how best to combine Just-In-Time (JIT) and Material-Requirements-Planning (MRP) philosophies in order to maximise the benefits of pull control in non-repetitive manufacturing environments. This paper provides a review of the research activities in these two approaches, presents a comparison between a Production Control Strategy (PCS) from each approach, and presents a comparison of the performance of several pull-type production control strategies in addressing the Service Level vs. WIP trade-off in an environment with low variability and a light-to-medium demand load.
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 457
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Look-back policies for two-stage, pull-type production/inventory systems
    Baykal-Guersoy, M.
    Altiok, T.
    Danhong, H.
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1994, 48 (04) : 381 - 400
  • [22] Fluoroscopy-Guided Removal of Pull-Type Gastrostomy Tubes
    Christopher M. Ahlers
    Jens Schneider
    Ricarda Lachmann
    Sascha Herber
    Christoph Düber
    Michael B. Pitton
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2008, 31
  • [23] Fluoroscopy-Guided Removal of Pull-Type Gastrostomy Tubes
    Ahlers, Christopher M.
    Schneider, Jens
    Lachmann, Ricarda
    Herber, Sascha
    Dueber, Christoph
    Pitton, Michael B.
    CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2008, 31 (06) : 1252 - 1254
  • [24] A predictive approach for dispatching of tasks in a pull-type robotic cell
    Lu, Ming-Shan
    Hsieh, Tong Chie
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (07) : 8825 - 8834
  • [25] Selecting manufacturing partners in push and pull-type smart collaborative networks
    Mladineo, Marko
    Celar, Stipo
    Celent, Luka
    Crnjac, Marina
    ADVANCED ENGINEERING INFORMATICS, 2018, 38 : 291 - 305
  • [26] PRECUT WITH THE STANDARD PULL-TYPE SPHINCTEROTOME FOR DIFFICULT BILIARY CANNULATION IN ERCP
    Garcia-Cano, Jesus
    Mora-Pena, Damian
    Taberna-Arana, Lourdes
    Antonia Godoy-Lopez, Maria
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2020, 91 (06) : AB366 - AB366
  • [27] A comparison of hybrid push/pull and CONWIP/pull production inventory control policies (vol 91, pg 75, 2004)
    Gonzalez-R, Pedro L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2010, 126 (02) : 387 - 387
  • [28] An economically constructed feeding tube for pull-type percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy
    Lin, XZ
    Chen, CY
    Chuang, CH
    Chen, CS
    Chang, GL
    ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 32 (05) : S25 - S25
  • [29] Retrofitting and Testing of a Pull-Type Small-Grain Combine Harvester
    Tian, Yuyuan
    Leis, Kyle
    Zeng, Zhiwei
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2023, 13 (04):
  • [30] Single-Step Method for Pull-Type Gastrostomy Tube Placement
    Ma, Shawn
    Lamparello, Nicole A.
    Paik, Helen
    Nadolski, Gregory
    Stavropoulos, William
    Tischfield, David
    Gade, Terence
    Shlansky-Goldberg, Richard D.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 31 (03) : 473 - 477