A review and comparison of hybrid and pull-type production control strategies

被引:4
|
作者
John Geraghty
Cathal Heavey
机构
[1] Dublin City University,School of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering
[2] University of Limerick,Department of Manufacturing and Operations Engineering
来源
OR Spectrum | 2005年 / 27卷
关键词
Hybrid Push/Pull; CONWIP/Pull; EKCS; BSCS; Kanban; Markov decision process; Discrete event simulation; Simulated annealing optimization algorithm;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In order to overcome the disadvantages of Kanban Control Strategy (KCS) in non-repetitive manufacturing environments, two research approaches have been followed in the literature in past two decades. The first approach has been concerned with developing new, or combining existing, pull-type production control strategies in order to maximise the benefits of pull control while increasing the ability of a production system to satisfy demand. The second approach has focused on how best to combine Just-In-Time (JIT) and Material-Requirements-Planning (MRP) philosophies in order to maximise the benefits of pull control in non-repetitive manufacturing environments. This paper provides a review of the research activities in these two approaches, presents a comparison between a Production Control Strategy (PCS) from each approach, and presents a comparison of the performance of several pull-type production control strategies in addressing the Service Level vs. WIP trade-off in an environment with low variability and a light-to-medium demand load.
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 457
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A review and comparison of hybrid and pull-type production control strategies
    Geraghty, J
    Heavey, C
    OR SPECTRUM, 2005, 27 (2-3) : 435 - 457
  • [2] Adaptive pull-type production control using Kalman filters
    Quintana, R
    Lambert, BK
    Roderick, L
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 1997, 35 (10) : 2689 - 2699
  • [3] Manufacturing Strategies for an optimal pull-type production control system. Case study in a textile industry
    Aldas, Darwin
    Reyes, John P.
    Morales, Luis A.
    Alvarez, Kevin M.
    Portalanza, Narcisa de J.
    Aman, Ricardo J.
    2018 CONGRESO INTERNACIONAL DE INNOVACION Y TENDENCIAS EN INGENIERIA (CONIITI), 2018,
  • [4] MULTISTAGE, PULL-TYPE PRODUCTION INVENTORY SYSTEMS
    ALTIOK, T
    RANJAN, R
    IIE TRANSACTIONS, 1995, 27 (02) : 190 - 200
  • [5] Multi-stage, pull-type production/inventory systems
    Altiok, Tayfur
    Ranjan, Raghav
    IIE Transactions (Institute of Industrial Engineers), 1995, 27 (02): : 190 - 200
  • [6] An approximation method to analyse polling models of pull-type production systems
    Karakul, Mustafa
    Dasci, Abdullah
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2007, 1 (02) : 200 - 222
  • [7] A comparison of Hybrid Push/Pull and CONWIP/Pull production inventory control policies
    Geraghty, J
    Heavey, C
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2004, 91 (01) : 75 - 90
  • [8] Design and analysis of a bionic pull-type subsoiler
    Jiang, Qing (jtao@ahau.edu.cn), 2018, Editura Politechnica (16):
  • [9] CONTROL POLICIES FOR 2-STAGE, PULL-TYPE PRODUCTION INVENTORY SYSTEMS WITH CONSTRAINED AVERAGE COST CRITERION
    GURSOY, MB
    ALTIOK, T
    DANHONG, H
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 1994, 32 (09) : 2005 - 2014
  • [10] Operational performance of a pull-type bean combine
    da Silva, Rouverson Pereira
    Reis, Leandro Daniel
    dos Reis, Gustavo Naves
    Angeli Furlani, Carlos Eduardo
    Lopes, Afonso
    Cortez, Jorge Wilson
    CIENCIA RURAL, 2008, 38 (05): : 1286 - 1291