ASO Visual Abstract: "Going Flat" After Mastectomy: Patient-Reported Outcomes by Online Survey

被引:0
|
作者
Baker, Jennifer L. [1 ]
Attai, Deanna J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
Wenziger, Cachet M. [4 ]
Streja, Elani [4 ]
Thompson, Carlie K. [1 ]
Lee, Minna K. [1 ]
DiNome, Maggie L. [1 ]
Attai, Deanna J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[2] Brown Univ, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[3] Lifespan Canc Inst, Providence, RI USA
[4] Univ Calif Irvine, Sch Med, Dept Med, Irvine, CA 92717 USA
[5] UCLA Hlth Burbank Breast Care, Burbank, CA 91505 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1245/s10434-021-09769-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The Going Flat movement aims to increase awareness and acceptance of mastectomy alone as a viable option for patients. Little is known about motivations and satisfaction with surgical outcomes in this population. Methods: An online survey was administered to 931 women who had a history of uni- or bilateral mastectomy for treatment of breast cancer or elevated breast cancer risk without current breast mound reconstruction. Satisfaction with outcome and surgeon support for the patient experience were characterized using 5-level scaled scores. Results: Mastectomy alone was the first choice for 73.7% of the respondents. The top two reasons for going flat were desire for a faster recovery and avoidance of a foreign body placement. Overall, the mean scaled satisfaction score was 3.72 ± 1.17 out of 5. In the multivariable analysis, low level of surgeon support for the decision to go flat was the strongest predictor of a satisfaction score lower than 3 (odds ratio [OR], 3.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.59–5.72; p < 0.001). Dissatisfaction also was more likely among respondents reporting a body mass index (BMI) of 30 kg/m2 or higher (OR, 2.74; 95% CI, 1.76–4.27; p < 0.001) and those undergoing a unilateral procedure (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.29–3.09; p = 0.002). Greater satisfaction was associated with receiving adequate information about surgical options (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.32–0.69; p < 0.0001) and having a surgeon with a specialized breast surgery practice (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.38–0.81; p = 0.002). Conclusions: Most patients undergoing mastectomy alone are satisfied with their surgical outcome. Surgeons may optimize patient experience by recognizing and supporting a patient’s decision to go flat. © 2021, Society of Surgical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:2507 / 2507
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ASO Visual Abstract: Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients with Clinical T4 Breast Cancer Treated with Mastectomy With and Without Reconstruction
    Palmquist, Emily
    Limberg, Jessica
    Chu, Jacqueline J.
    White, Charlie
    Baser, Raymond E.
    Sevilimedu, Varadan
    Pawloski, Kate R.
    Garcia, Paula
    Nelson, Jonas A.
    Moo, Tracy-Ann
    Morrow, Monica
    Tadros, Audree B.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (01) : 124 - 125
  • [22] ASO Visual Abstract: Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients with Clinical T4 Breast Cancer Treated with Mastectomy With and Without Reconstruction
    Emily Palmquist
    Jessica Limberg
    Jacqueline J. Chu
    Charlie White
    Raymond E. Baser
    Varadan Sevilimedu
    Kate R. Pawloski
    Paula Garcia
    Jonas A. Nelson
    Tracy-Ann Moo
    Monica Morrow
    Audree B. Tadros
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2023, 30 : 124 - 125
  • [23] ASO Visual Abstract: Symptom Trajectories Informing Patient Care After Lung Cancer Surgery: A Longitudinal Patient-Reported Outcome Study
    Li Tang
    Hongfan Yu
    Wei Dai
    Xiaojun Yang
    Xing Wei
    Xin Shelley Wang
    Charles S. Cleeland
    Qiang Li
    Qiuling Shi
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2023, 30 : 2618 - 2619
  • [24] ASO Visual Abstract: Symptom Trajectories Informing Patient Care After Lung Cancer Surgery: A Longitudinal Patient-Reported Outcome Study
    Tang, Li
    Yu, Hongfan
    Dai, Wei
    Yang, Xiaojun
    Wei, Xing
    Wang, Xin Shelley
    Cleeland, Charles S.
    Li, Qiang
    Shi, Qiuling
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (05) : 2618 - 2619
  • [25] ASO Visual Abstract: Short-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Bilateral Risk-Reducing Mastectomy for Patients at High Risk for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Ntowe, Koumani W.
    Lee, Michael S.
    Yi, Victoria N.
    Kaplan, Samantha J.
    Phillips, Brett T.
    Chiba, Akiko
    Plichta, Jennifer K.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2025, 32 (04) : 2603 - 2604
  • [26] A Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Conventional Mastectomy with Reconstruction
    Anya Romanoff
    Emily C. Zabor
    Michelle Stempel
    Virgilio Sacchini
    Andrea Pusic
    Monica Morrow
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2018, 25 : 2909 - 2916
  • [27] A Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Conventional Mastectomy with Reconstruction
    Romanoff, Anya
    Zabor, Emily C.
    Stempel, Michelle
    Sacchini, Virgilio
    Pusic, Andrea
    Morrow, Monica
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 (10) : 2909 - 2916
  • [28] ASO Visual Abstract: "Peace of Mind" After Mastectomy: A Scoping Review
    Hamid, Safraz A.
    Bakkila, Baylee
    Schultz, Kurt S.
    Grimshaw, Alyssa A.
    Gunderson, Craig G.
    Godfrey, Elizabeth L.
    Lee, Clara
    Berger, Elizabeth
    Rosenberg, Shoshana
    Greenup, Rachel A.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31 (08) : 5213 - 5214
  • [29] ASO Visual Abstract: Long-Term Patient-Reported Arm Symptoms in Breast Cancer Survivors
    Laws, Alison
    Lagendijk, Mirelle
    Grossmith, Samantha
    Hughes, Melissa
    Lin, Nancy U.
    Mittendorf, Elizabeth A.
    Eliassen, A. Heather
    King, Tari A.
    Dominici, Laura S.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31 (04) : 2280 - 2281
  • [30] Examining Race and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy with Reconstruction
    Myers, Sara P.
    Bayard, Solange
    Tadros, Audree B.
    Sevilimedu, Varadan
    Matros, Evan
    Nelson, Jonas A.
    Le, Tiana
    Garcia, Paula
    Morrow, Monica
    Lee, Minna K.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31 (02) : 744 - 752