Alternative approaches to develop environmental contours from metocean data

被引:62
|
作者
Manuel L. [1 ]
Nguyen P.T.T. [1 ]
Canning J. [1 ]
Coe R.G. [2 ]
Eckert-Gallup A.C. [2 ]
Martin N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univerity of Texas, Austin, 78712, TX
[2] Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, 87185, NM
关键词
copula; Environmental contour method; Extremes; Metocean data;
D O I
10.1007/s40722-018-0123-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
It is necessary to evaluate site-specific extreme environmental conditions in the design of wave energy converters (WECs) as well as other offshore structures. As WECs are generally resonance-driven devices, critical metocean parameters associated with a target return period of interest (e.g., 50 years) must generally be established using combinations, say, of significant wave height and spectral peak period, as opposed to identifying single-valued wave height levels alone. We present several methods for developing so-called “environmental contours” for any target return period. The environmental contour (EC) method has been widely acknowledged as an efficient way to derive design loads for offshore oil and gas platforms and for land-based as well as offshore wind turbines. The use of this method for WECs is also being considered. A challenge associated with its use relates to the need to accurately characterize the uncertainties in metocean variables that define the “environment”. The joint occurrence frequency of values of two or more random variables needs to be defined formally. There are many ways this can be done—the most thorough and complete of these is to define a multivariate joint probability distribution of the random variables. However, challenges arise when data from the site where the WEC device is to be deployed are limited, making it difficult to estimate the joint probability distribution. A more easily estimated set of inputs consists of marginal distribution functions for each random variable and pairwise correlation coefficients. Pearson correlation coefficients convey information that rely on up to the second moment of each variable and on the expected value of the product of the paired variables. Kendall’s rank correlation coefficients, on the other hand, convey information on similarity in the “rank” of two variables and are useful especially in dealing with extreme values. The EC method is easily used with Rosenblatt transformations when joint distributions are available. In cases where Pearson’s correlation coefficients have been estimated along with marginal distributions, a Nataf transformation can be used, and if Kendall’s rank coefficients have been estimated and are available, a copula-based transformation can be used. We demonstrate the derivation of 50-year sea state parameters using the EC method with all three approaches where we consider data from the National Data Buoy Center Station 46022 (which can be considered the site for potential WEC deployment). A comparison of the derived environmental contours using the three approaches is presented. The focus of this study is on investigating differences between the derived environmental contours and, thus, on associated sea states arising from the different dependence structure assumptions for the metocean random variables. Both parametric and non-parametric approaches are used to define the probability distributions. © 2018, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 310
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The role of fintech, natural resources, environmental taxes and urbanization on environmental sustainability: Evidence from the novel panel data approaches
    Feng, Haiyan
    Li, Yan
    RESOURCES POLICY, 2024, 92
  • [42] MULTIVERSE: Mining Collective Data Science Knowledge from Code on the Web to Suggest Alternative Analysis Approaches
    Merrill, Mike A.
    Zhang, Ge
    Althoff, Tim
    KDD '21: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 27TH ACM SIGKDD CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY & DATA MINING, 2021, : 1212 - 1222
  • [43] Immunoaffinity Extraction and Alternative Approaches for the Analysis of Toxins in Environmental, Food or Biological Matrices
    Delaunay, Nathalie
    Combes, Audrey
    Pichon, Valerie
    TOXINS, 2020, 12 (12)
  • [44] Narratives of the Environmental Films in Buenos Aires: Expert's Speeches or Alternative Approaches?
    Fernandez Bouzo, Soledad
    LETRAS VERDES, 2018, (23): : 23 - 45
  • [45] 3D reconstruction from planar contours: Analysis of heuristic tiling approaches
    Da Silva Hounsell, Marcelo
    Bittencourt, Leonardo Kandler
    Silva, Alexandre Gonçalves
    Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 2014, 8360 : 95 - 114
  • [46] Nine months of daily LiDAR, orthophotos and MetOcean data from the eroding soft cliff coast at Happisburgh, UK
    Pennington, Catherine
    Shaw, Matthew
    Brooks, Thomas
    Briganti, Riccardo
    Gomez-Pazo, Alejandro
    Ruffini, Gioele
    Appleton, Matthew
    Payo, Andres
    SCIENTIFIC DATA, 2024, 11 (01)
  • [47] ALTERNATIVE REGRESSION APPROACHES TO ANALYSIS OF MEDICAL-CARE SURVEY DATA
    KOBASHIGAWA, B
    BERKI, SE
    MEDICAL CARE, 1977, 15 (05) : 396 - 408
  • [48] Two alternative approaches for selecting performance measures in data envelopment analysis
    Toloo, Mehdi
    Tichy, Tomas
    MEASUREMENT, 2015, 65 : 29 - 40
  • [49] Efficient and alternative approaches for imputing missing data to estimate population mean
    Pandey A.K.
    Singh G.N.
    Bhattacharyya D.
    Singh P.K.
    Quality & Quantity, 2024, 58 (6) : 5883 - 5897
  • [50] Assessing the reliability of ecological monitoring data: Power analysis and alternative approaches
    Morrison, Lloyd W.
    NATURAL AREAS JOURNAL, 2007, 27 (01) : 83 - 91