Validation of hydrogeochemical databases for problems in deep geothermal energy

被引:0
|
作者
Thorsten Hörbrand
Thomas Baumann
Helge C. Moog
机构
[1] Erdwerk GmbH,Institute of Hydrochemistry
[2] Technical University of Munich,undefined
[3] GRS gGmbH,undefined
来源
关键词
Hydrogeochemical modelling; Thermodynamic database; Geothermal; PHREEQC; ChemApp; HKF;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Hydrogeochemical modelling has become an important tool for the exploration and optimisation of deep hydrogeothermal energy resources. However, well-established software and model concepts are often run outside of its temperature, pressure, and salinity ranges. The core of the model codes are thermodynamic databases which contain a more or less complete subset of mineral phases, dissolved species, and gases occurring in geothermal systems. Although very carefully compiled, they should not be taken for granted at extreme conditions but checked prior to application. This study compares the performance of four commonly used geochemical databases, phreeqc.dat, llnl.dat, pitzer.dat, and slop16.dat. The parameter files phreeqc.dat, pitzer.dat, and llnl.dat are distributed with PHREEQC and implement extended Debye–Hückel and Pitzer equations. Thermodynamic data in slop16.dat represent an implementation of the revised Helgeson–Kirkham–Flowers formalism and were converted to be used with the Gibbs Energy Minimizer ChemApp for this work. Test calculations focussed on the solubility for some of the most common scale-forming mineral phases (barite, celestite, calcite, siderite, and dolomite). The databases provided with PHREEQC performed comparatively well, as long as the range of validity was respected for which the corresponding database was developed. While it is obvious to use pitzer.dat at high salinities instead of phreeqc.dat, the range of validity for high temperature is usually not given in the database and has to be checked manually. The results also revealed outdated equilibrium constants for celestite in slop16.dat and llnl.dat and the lack of adequate temperature functions for the solubility constants of siderite and dolomite in all databases. For those two minerals, new thermodynamic data are available. There is, however, a lack of experimental thermodynamic data for scale-forming minerals in low-enthalpy geothermal settings, which has to be addressed for successful modelling.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Exploration for deep geothermal reservoirs in Luxembourg and the surroundings - perspectives of geothermal energy use
    Tom Schintgen
    Geothermal Energy, 3
  • [22] Hydrogeochemical and Hydrogeological Investigation of the Can Geothermal Field
    Deniz, Ozan
    Baba, Alper
    Tarcan, Gultekin
    TURKIYE JEOLOJI BULTENI-GEOLOGICAL BULLETIN OF TURKEY, 2010, 53 (2-3): : 159 - 184
  • [23] Accident risk assessment for deep geothermal energy systems
    Spada, M.
    Sutra, E.
    Wolf, S.
    Burgherr, P.
    SAFETY AND RELIABILITY: METHODOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS, 2015, : 1523 - 1530
  • [24] Opportunities, risks and acceptance of deep geothermal energy in Germany
    Von Hartmann, Hartwig
    Swiss Bulletin for Applied Geology, 2018, 23 (02): : 98 - 99
  • [25] GEOTHERMAL-ENERGY DEVELOPMENT AND RELATED MATERIALS PROBLEMS
    ROWLEY, JC
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 1976, 21 (03): : 282 - 283
  • [26] Deep geothermal energy success model - Part 2
    Reinicke, Kurt M.
    Reichetseder, Peter
    Euroheat and Power/Fernwarme International, 2020, 2020 (11-12): : 14 - 17
  • [27] Possibilities of Utilization of deep Geothermal Energy - State and Perspectives
    Erbas, Kemal
    Frick, Stephanie
    Saadat, Ali
    Kranz, Stefan
    Huenges, Ernst
    GEOTHERMISCHE TECHNOLOGIEN: TECHNOLOGIEN ZUR NUTZUNG DER TIEFEN GEOTHERMIE UND IHRE INTEGRATION IN ENERGIEVERSORGUNGSSYSTEME, 2010, 2082 : 31 - 31
  • [28] Geothermal Energy Use and Related Problems in Afyonkarahisar Province
    Kervankiran, Ismail
    MARMARA GEOGRAPHICAL REVIEW, 2012, (25): : 108 - 126
  • [29] Acceptance of Deep Geothermal Energy – Communication as Crucial Factor
    Borg, Anna
    Mining Report, 2020, 156 (06) : 578 - 586
  • [30] TECHNICAL AND ANALYTICAL PROBLEMS IN UTILIZATION OF GEOTHERMAL-ENERGY
    BRESEE, JC
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1976, : 42 - 42