Indirect carbon emissions from household consumption between China and the USA: based on an input–output model

被引:0
|
作者
Xiao-Wei Ma
Jia Du
Meng-Ying Zhang
Yi Ye
机构
[1] Beijing Institute of Technology,Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research
[2] Beijing Institute of Technology,School of Management and Economics
来源
Natural Hazards | 2016年 / 84卷
关键词
Indirect CO; emissions; Household energy consumption; Industrial distribution; IO method;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Based on an input–output model, this paper calculates carbon emissions from household energy consumption in 2002, 2005, 2007, and 2010 between China and the USA. By a comparative analysis of the two countries, the results indicate the following: (1) In terms of the total household indirect carbon emissions, the USA has always been at a higher level than China. However, in recent years, China has presented a rapidly rising trend. In contrast, the USA appears to be experiencing a downward trend. (2) Indirect carbon emissions from USA household consumption mainly focus on Residence; Education, Culture, and Recreation; and Transport and Communications. By comparison, residence accounts for 50 % of China’s household indirect carbon emissions, and seven other sectors are much less than the USA (3) Although the number of China’s household facilities is growing rapidly, the carbon emissions remain at a relatively steady level. (4) In terms of the absolute value of the indirect carbon emissions from housing, the USA maintains a steady 400 million ton, while China increased from 150 to 500 million ton over 2002–2010.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 410
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Inequality of household energy and water consumption in China: An input-output analysis
    Fan, Jing-Li
    Chen, Kun-Yu
    Zhang, Xian
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 269
  • [22] Carbon emissions of China's industrial sectors based on input-output analysis
    Xiaohong Yu
    Miao Xu
    Yumeng Ding
    Chinese Journal of Population,Resources and Environment, 2017, 15 (02) : 147 - 156
  • [23] The impact of urbanization and consumption patterns on China’s black carbon emissions based on input–output analysis and structural decomposition analysis
    Zhongci Deng
    Ping Kang
    Zhen Wang
    Xiaoling Zhang
    Weijie Li
    Yihan Ou
    Yu Lei
    Ying Dang
    Zhongren Deng
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28 : 2914 - 2922
  • [24] Impact of marginal and intergenerational effects on carbon emissions from household energy consumption in China
    Hu, Zhen
    Wang, Mei
    Cheng, Zhe
    Yang, Zhenshan
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 273
  • [25] Carbon emissions from the service sector: an input-output application to Beijing, China
    Ge, Jianping
    Lei, Yalin
    CLIMATE RESEARCH, 2014, 60 (01) : 13 - 24
  • [26] Analysis of China's carbon emissions from residential consumer products based on input-output method
    Sheng, Z. L.
    Graciela, C.
    BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2020, 126 : 3 - 4
  • [27] An empirical analysis of the household consumption-induced carbon emissions in China
    Liu, Jinyu
    Murshed, Muntasir
    Chen, Fuzhong
    Shahbaz, Muhammad
    Kirikkaleli, Dervis
    Khan, Zeeshan
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2021, 26 : 943 - 957
  • [28] Quantification of indirect waste generation and treatment arising from Australian household consumption: A waste input-output analysis
    He, He
    Reynolds, Christian John
    Hadjikakou, Michalis
    Holyoak, Nicholas
    Boland, John
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 258
  • [29] Direct and Indirect Carbon Emission from Household Consumption Based on LMDI and SDA Model: A Decomposition and Comparison Analysis
    Chen, Jingjing
    Lin, Yangyang
    Wang, Xiaojun
    Mao, Bingjing
    Peng, Lihong
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (14)
  • [30] An Empirical Study of the Relationship between Investment and Carbon Emission in China: Based on the Input-output Model
    Sun, Han-Shi
    Chen, Kun-Kun
    Li, Du-Yu
    Ning, Jia-Chen
    Ding, Tao
    Ning, Ya-Dong
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (EDEP 2017), 2017, 168 : 439 - 446