Forbush Decreases and Associated Geomagnetic Storms: Statistical Comparison in Solar Cycles 23 and 24

被引:0
|
作者
A. A. Melkumyan
A. V. Belov
N. S. Shlyk
M. A. Abunina
A. A. Abunin
V. A. Oleneva
V. G. Yanke
机构
[1] IZMIRAN,Pushkov Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere, and Radio Wave Propagation Russian Academy of Sciences
来源
Solar Physics | 2024年 / 299卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Statistical relations between the geomagnetic Dst index, cosmic ray variations, and solar wind characteristics are compared for Forbush decreases associated with: (i) coronal mass ejections from active regions (AR-CMEs) accompanied by solar flares, (ii) filament eruptions outside active regions, (iii) corotating interaction regions (CIRs) caused by high-speed streams from coronal holes, (iv) mixed events induced by two or more solar sources. Relationships of geomagnetic indices and parameters of cosmic rays and the solar wind are also compared between sporadic events with or without magnetic clouds (MCs) and between Solar Cycles (SCs) 23 and 24. The results reveal that interplanetary disturbances originated by AR-CMEs associated with an MC are most geoeffective and cause powerful geomagnetic storms, while CIRs create only moderate and weak storms. Sporadic and recurrent events differ in values of the Dst index and southward component of the magnetic field, as well as in the relationship between them. For sporadic events, geomagnetic activity is more affected by the presence or absence of an MC than by the type of solar source. Interplanetary disturbances associated with AR-CMEs are more effective in SC 23 while those associated with other types of solar sources have approximately the same geoeffectiveness in both SCs.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Temporal changes in the energy spectrum of Forbush decreases in 20-23 solar activity cycles
    Grigoriev V.G.
    Starodubtsev S.A.
    Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Physics, 2011, 75 (6) : 801 - 804
  • [42] The Frequency-Domain Characterization of Cosmic Ray Intensity Variations Before Forbush Decreases Associated With Geomagnetic Storms
    Ye, Qian
    Wang, Cong
    He, Fei
    Xue, Bingsen
    Zhang, Xiaoxin
    SPACE WEATHER-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2022, 20 (03):
  • [43] Analysis of solar, interplanetary, and geomagnetic parameters during solar cycles 22, 23, and 24
    Adhikari, Binod
    Subodh, Dahal
    Mishra, Roshan Kumar
    Sapkota, Nirakar
    Chhatkuli, Daya Nidhi
    Sapkota, Santosh Ballav
    Adhikari, Sarala
    Chapagain, Narayan P.
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES, 2019, 19 (01):
  • [44] Forbush Decreases and Geomagnetic Storms During a Highly Disturbed Solar and Interplanetary Period, 4-10 September 2017
    Badruddin, B.
    Aslam, O. P. M.
    Derouich, M.
    Asiri, H.
    Kudela, K.
    SPACE WEATHER-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2019, 17 (03): : 487 - 496
  • [45] Non-zonality of ozone response to geomagnetic storms and forbush decreases of cosmic rays
    Lastovicka, J
    LONG-TERM TRENDS: THERMOSPHERE, MESOSPHERE, STRATOSPHERE, AND LOWER IONOSPHERE, 2003, 32 (09): : 1793 - 1802
  • [46] Geomagnetic storms of cycle 24 and their solar sources
    Shinichi Watari
    Earth, Planets and Space, 69
  • [47] Geomagnetic storms of cycle 24 and their solar sources
    Watari, Shinichi
    EARTH PLANETS AND SPACE, 2017, 69
  • [48] Intense geomagnetic storms with Ap ≥ 100 during 21-23 sunspot solar cycles
    Kumar, S.
    Yadav, M. P.
    Mishra, Rajesh K.
    Mishra, Rekha Agrawal
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 29TH INTERNATIONAL COSMIC RAY CONFERENCE, VOL 2: SH3, 2005, : 65 - 68
  • [49] Solar and interplanetary precursors of geomagnetic storms in solar cycle 23
    Uwamahoro, J.
    McKinnell, L. -A.
    ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2013, 51 (03) : 395 - 410
  • [50] Prediction of intensity of moderate and intense geomagnetic storms using artificial neural network during two complete solar cycles 23 and 24
    Pratyush Kumar Singh
    Indian Journal of Physics, 2022, 96 : 2235 - 2242