The QA Pressure Measurement System: an accuracy and reliability study

被引:0
|
作者
D van Dijk
G Aufdemkampe
S van Langeveld
机构
[1] Center Hospital Apeldoorn,Department of Physical Therapy
[2] Polytechnic of Utrecht,undefined
[3] Rehabilitation Centre `De Hoogstraat',undefined
来源
Spinal Cord | 1999年 / 37卷
关键词
decubitus ulcer; reliability; accuracy; measurement; spinal cord injury;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The main purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy and reliability of the Queen Alexandra Pressure Measurement System (QA PMS). Furthermore, we examined whether there were significant differences in measured pressures of the buttock area during sitting between normal subjects and spinal cord injured (SCI) patients. Design: Accuracy (calibration) and reliability (test-retest) study. Setting: The spinal cord unit of Tertiary Care Centre `De Hoogstraat' in Utrecht, The Netherlands. Patients: A convenience sample of 16 SCI patients and 15 normal subjects. Main Outcome Measures: The accuracy was determined by using the Standard Error of the Mean (SEM, in mmHg). The Technical Error of Measurement (TEM, in mmHg) was calculated as measure for differences between two paired measurements. The reliability was determined by using an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Significant differences in measured pressures between both groups (P<0.05) were determined by using an unpaired (two sample) t-test. Results: Accuracy (calibration): mean SEM=0.30 (±0.1) mmHg, indicating a high level of accuracy. Differences between two paired measurements: mean TEM calibration=1.87 (±0.76) mmHg; mean TEM normal subjects=4.76 (±1.78) mmHg; mean TEM SCI patients=6.34 (±2.19) mmHg. Reliability: mean ICC(3,1) calibration=0.85 (95% CI=0.74–0.95); mean ICC(2,1) normal subjects=0.92 (95% CI=0.90–0.94); mean ICC(2,1) SCI patients=0.90 (95% CI=0.88–0.92). The normal subjects had significantly higher mean pressures (P=0.028) than the SCI patients (mean pressures 31.0 vs 28.5 mmHg), whilst the SCI patients had significantly higher peak-pressures (P=0.0000) than the normal subjects (mean peak-pressures: 134.1 vs 75.7 mmHg). Conclusions: The QA Pressure Measurement System has sufficient accuracy and good reliability as a measurement procedure. There are significant differences between the measured pressures of both groups: the significantly higher peak pressures of the SCI patients seem to be the most important.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 128
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] THE REMLER AMBULATORY BLOOD-PRESSURE RECORDING-SYSTEM - ACCURACY AND RELIABILITY
    COWAN, R
    SOKOLOW, M
    PERLOFF, D
    BRITISH HEART JOURNAL, 1980, 43 (06): : 715 - 716
  • [22] A field study of the accuracy and reliability of a biometric iris recognition system
    Latman, Neal S.
    Herb, Emily
    SCIENCE & JUSTICE, 2013, 53 (02) : 98 - 102
  • [23] ACCURACY OF HYDROSTATIC-PRESSURE MEASUREMENT WITH A DISPOSABLE DOME TRANSDUCER SYSTEM
    PHILIP, JH
    PHILIP, BK
    LEHR, JL
    MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION, 1985, 19 (06): : 273 - 274
  • [24] Accuracy of measurement tools in the SIM/Plant™ system.: (Part 1.: Reliability of distances measurement)
    Hagiwara, Y
    Koizumi, M
    Honda, K
    Igarashi, T
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 77 : 838 - 838
  • [25] Reliability of an in-shoe pressure measurement system during treadmill walking
    Kernozek, TW
    LaMott, EE
    Dancisak, MJ
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 1996, 17 (04) : 204 - 209
  • [26] The feasibility study of clinical high accuracy QA system for treatment planning using Monte Carlo
    Lee, B.
    Kim, H.
    Jeong, S.
    Jung, S.
    Shin, E.
    Park, H.
    Lim, D.
    Lee, J.
    Chung, J.
    Yoon, M.
    Han, Y.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S952 - S953
  • [27] Study and design of high accuracy and intelligent measurement system
    Institute of Machinery and Electricity Engineerings, Zhengzhou Aeronautics Industrial Management College, Zhengzhou 450005, China
    不详
    Dianzi Qijian, 2006, 4 (1255-1258):
  • [28] Reliability Study of ExacTrac-System Image Isocenter Using An On-Demand QA Procedure
    Wang, X.
    Zhao, Z.
    Du, W.
    Li, X.
    Yang, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (06) : 3663 - 3663
  • [29] Time poor: Rushing decreases the accuracy and reliability of blood pressure measurement technique in pregnancy.
    Reinders, L.
    Mos, C.
    Thornton, C.
    Ogle, R.
    Makris, A.
    Child, A.
    Hennessy, A.
    HYPERTENSION IN PREGNANCY, 2006, 25 : 164 - 164
  • [30] Reliability of measurement monitoring including specifications for the indicators of measurement accuracy
    V. I. Serykh
    Yu. A. Palchun
    I. G. Kvitkova
    Measurement Techniques, 2011, 54 : 599 - 605