Cumulative risk of cancer detection in breast cancer screening by protocol strategy

被引:0
|
作者
J. Blanch
M. Sala
M. Román
M. Ederra
D. Salas
R. Zubizarreta
M. Sanchez
M. Rué
X. Castells
机构
[1] Hospital del Mar-IMIM,Epidemiology and Evaluation Department
[2] Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB),EHEA Doctoral Program in Public Health. Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Preventive Medicine and Public Health
[3] Red de investigacion en servicios de salud en enfermedades crónicas (REDISSEC),Navarra Breast Cancer Screening Program
[4] Instituto de Salud Pública,Galician Breast Cancer Screening Program
[5] CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP),Programas de Salud de la Mujer, Dirección General de Salud Pública
[6] General Directorate of Public Health and Center for Public Health Research (CSISP-FISABIO),Basic Medical Sciences Department
[7] Directorate for innovation and management of public health. Health Office,undefined
[8] Consejería de Sanidad y Servicios Sociales Gobierno de Cantabria,undefined
[9] Biomedical Research Institut of Lleida (IRBLLEIDA)-University of Lleida,undefined
来源
关键词
Breast cancer; Screening; Cumulative risk; Detection risk; Protocol strategies;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background There is little information on the individual risk of screen-detected cancer in women over successive participations. This study aimed to estimate the 10-year cumulative breast cancer detection risk (ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive carcinoma) in a population-based breast cancer screening program according to distinct protocol strategies. A further aim was to determine which strategies maximized the cancer detection risk and how this risk was affected by the radiologic protocol variables. Methods Data were drawn from a retrospective cohort of women from nine population-based screening programs in Spain from 1990 to 2006. We used logistic regression with discrete intervals to estimate the cumulative detection risk at 10 years of follow-up according to radiologic variables and protocol strategies. Results In women starting screening at the age of 45–59 years, the cumulative risk of screen-detected cancer at 10 years ranged from 11.11 to 16.71 per 1,000 participants according to the protocol strategy. The cumulative detection risk for overall cancer and invasive cancer was the highest with strategies using digital mammography, double reading, and two projections (16.71 and 12.07 ‰, respectively). For ductal carcinoma in situ, cumulative detection risk was the highest with strategies using screen-film, double reading, and two projections (2.32 ‰). The risk was the lowest with strategies using screen-film mammography, single reading, and two projections. Conclusions This study found that at least eleven cancers are detected per 1,000 women screened in the first 10 years of follow-up. Enhanced knowledge of the variability in cumulative risk of screen-detected cancer could improve protocol strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:869 / 877
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] HIGHER CANCER DETECTION RISK IN WOMEN WITH A FALSE POSITIVE RESULT IN BREAST CANCER SCREENING IN SPAIN
    Blanch, J.
    Romero, A.
    Sala, M.
    Roman, R.
    Salas, D.
    Zubizarreta, R.
    Ederra, M.
    Bare, M.
    Galceran, J.
    Gonzalez-Roman, I.
    Natal, C.
    de la Vega, M.
    Baroja, A.
    Macia, F.
    Castells, X.
    JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2011, 65 : A152 - A152
  • [32] Risk-Specific Optimal Cancer Screening Schedules: An Application to Breast Cancer Early Detection
    Ahern C.H.
    Cheng Y.
    Shen Y.
    Statistics in Biosciences, 2011, 3 (2) : 169 - 186
  • [33] BREAst screening Tailored for HEr (BREATHE)-A study protocol on personalised risk-based breast cancer screening programme
    Liu, Jenny
    Ho, Peh Joo
    Tan, Tricia Hui Ling
    Yeoh, Yen Shing
    Chew, Ying Jia
    Riza, Nur Khaliesah Mohamed
    Khng, Alexis Jiaying
    Goh, Su-Ann
    Wang, Yi
    Oh, Han Boon
    Chin, Chi Hui
    Kwek, Sing Cheer
    Zhang, Zhi Peng
    Ong, Desmond Luan Seng
    Quek, Swee Tian
    Tan, Chuan Chien
    Wee, Hwee Lin
    Li, Jingmei
    Iau, Philip Tsau Choong
    Hartman, Mikael
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (03):
  • [34] Family History of Breast Cancer, Breast Density, and Breast Cancer Risk in a US Breast Cancer Screening Population
    Ahern, Thomas P.
    Sprague, Brian L.
    Bissell, Michael C. S.
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    Buist, Diana S. M.
    Braithwaite, Dejana
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2017, 26 (06) : 938 - 944
  • [35] An overview protocol of biomarkers for breast cancer detection
    Sheng, Zhijuan
    Wang, Jing
    Li, Muyang
    Luo, Xinyue
    Cai, Runjin
    Zhang, Mei
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (24)
  • [36] Breast cancer detection rates, and standardised detection ratios for prevalence screening in the New Zealand breast cancer screening programme
    Richardson, A
    Graham, P
    Brown, T
    Smale, P
    Cox, B
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2004, 11 (02) : 65 - 69
  • [37] Patterns of breast cancer screening among lesbians at increased risk for breast cancer
    Burnett, CB
    Steakley, CS
    Slack, R
    Roth, J
    Lerman, C
    WOMEN & HEALTH, 1999, 29 (04) : 35 - 55
  • [38] Strategy for Breast Cancer Screening in Taiwan: Obstetriciane-Gynecologists Should Actively Participate in Breast Cancer Screening
    Chang, Li-Yun
    Yang, Ya-Ling
    Shyu, Ming-Kwang
    Hwa, Hsiao-Lin
    Hsieh, Fon-Jou
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ULTRASOUND, 2012, 20 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [39] The Cumulative Risk of False-Positive Results in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program: Updated Results
    Roman, Marta
    Hubbard, Rebecca A.
    Sebuodegard, Sofie
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    Castells, Xavier
    Hofvind, Solveig
    CANCER, 2013, 119 (22) : 3952 - 3958
  • [40] The impact of breast density on breast cancer risk and breast screening
    Houssami N.
    Kerlikowske K.
    Current Breast Cancer Reports, 2012, 4 (2) : 161 - 168