Agile Blended Learning: A Promising Approach for Higher Education in the UAE

被引:0
|
作者
Halder D. [1 ]
Al Bastaki E.M. [1 ]
Suleymanova S. [1 ]
Muhammad N. [1 ]
Purushothaman A. [1 ]
机构
[1] University of Dubai, Academic City, Emirates Road-Exit 49, Dubai
关键词
Agile learning; Blended learning; Higher education in UAE; Technology;
D O I
10.1007/s42979-024-02813-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Covid-19 pandemic has caused a paradigm shift in terms of the adoption of technology in the realm of education, leading to a greater understanding of the advantages of blended learning. Higher educational institutions globally and in the United Arab Emirates have experienced this shift and have recognized that this approach can offer the necessary opportunities and flexibility to meet the demands of future education. This study aims to integrate the strengths of agile learning and blended learning to explore the possibility of developing new pedagogical practices to meet the various learning requirements of learners. The emergence of the blended learning paradigm, and agile approaches to ensure flexibility and sustainability in higher education are covered in this study. It explores theoretical and empirical literature to outline the potential benefits of blended learning, especially in the UAE, influenced by governmental development strategies, technological integration, and pedagogical innovations. This paper proposed an integrated holistic agile blended learning framework for fostering innovation in university teaching and learning. A fishbone analysis approach was utilized to identify possible barriers to implement agile blended learning, and a checklist for reviewing the progress of implementation and continuous improvement was suggested. This study highlights the importance of developing self-organized active learners, building more focus on scaffolding for faculty and students, as well as more institutional support and advanced infrastructure to support the agile blended learning process. It drives further research into flexible, learner-centered, and sustainable practices across higher education. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2024.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Constructivism Based Blended Learning in Higher Education
    Al-Huneidi, Ahmad M.
    Schreurs, Jeanne
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES IN LEARNING, 2012, 7 (01): : 4 - 9
  • [22] Blended learning: Deficits and prospects in higher education
    Cuesta Medina, Liliana
    AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 34 (01) : 42 - 56
  • [23] BLENDED LEARNING MODEL IN THE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION
    Lisetskyi, K. A.
    ADVANCED EDUCATION, 2015, (04) : 32 - 35
  • [24] Blended Learning Evaluation in Higher Education Courses
    Gounopoulos, Elias
    Kontogiannis, Sotirios
    Valsamidis, Stavros
    Kazanidis, Ioannis
    ECONOMIES OF BALKAN AND EASTERN EUROPE COUNTRIES IN THE CHANGED WORLD (EBEEC), 2017, : 385 - 399
  • [25] BLENDED LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS
    Hebebci, Mustafa Tevfik
    Ozer, Nilay
    TURKISH ONLINE JOURNAL OF DISTANCE EDUCATION, 2023, 24 (03): : 93 - 116
  • [26] Blended learning and system approaches in higher education
    Rabe, Vlasta
    3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS: TECHNOLOGIES AND APPLICATIONS, VOL 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, : 170 - 173
  • [27] Utilizing MOOCs for Blended Learning in Higher Education
    Shafaat, Ali
    Marbouti, Farshid
    Rodgers, Kelsey
    2014 IEEE FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE (FIE), 2014, : 723 - 726
  • [28] MODEL FOR ANALYZING BLENDED LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION
    Gamiz Sanchez, Vanesa
    Gallego Arrufat, Maria Jesus
    EDUCACION XX1, 2016, 19 (01): : 39 - 61
  • [29] A Thematic Review of Blended Learning in Higher Education
    Pima, John Marco
    Odetayo, Michael
    Iqbal, Rahat
    Sedoyeka, Eliamani
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOBILE AND BLENDED LEARNING, 2018, 10 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [30] FLEXIBLE FRAMEWORKS FOR BLENDED LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION
    Fox, Bob
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD TEACHING & EDUCATION CONFERENCE, 2016, : 104 - 112