Application of Fruit Wastes as Cost-Effective Carbon Sources for Biological Sulphate Reduction

被引:1
|
作者
Ali Hussain
Muhammad Anwar Iqbal
Arshad Javid
Abdul Razaq
Sumaira Aslam
Ali Hasan
Muhammad Akmal
Javed Iqbal Qazi
机构
[1] University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences,Department of Wildlife and Ecology
[2] Women University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir,Department of Zoology
[3] University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences,Discipline of Botany
[4] Government College Women University,Department of Zoology
[5] University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences,Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture
[6] University of the Punjab,Department of Zoology
关键词
Cost-effective carbon sources; Economical bioremediation; Fruit wastes; Sulphate-reducing bacteria; Wastewater treatment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We conducted a study dealing with the economical application of sulphate-reducing bacteria (SRB) for the treatment of sulphate-rich wastewater. In this study, four types of frequently available fruit wastes were employed as carbon sources for economical cultivation of the SRB and consequent reduction of sulphate from artificially prepared sulphate-rich wastewater. The bacterial species employed in this study were isolated from a leading wastewater channel in Pakistan and characterized phenotypically as well as genotypically. The bacterial identities were proved after BLAST analysis and construction of phylogenetic tree. Among all of the SRB species employed for sulphate reduction, Desulfovibrio fructosovorans-HAQ2 was found as the leading sulphate reducer and reduced sulphate maximally to 29% (0.51 ± 0.02 g L−1), 76% (1.51 ± 0.07 g L−1), 41% (0.83 ± 0.02 g L−1), and 63% (1.25 ± 0.02 g L−1) using apple peelings, apple pomace, mango peelings, and watermelon rind, respectively, in a 60-day trial of anaerobic incubation. In the present study, apple pomace appeared as the most suitable carbon source only for Desulfovibrio fructosovorans-HAQ2, while any of the other three bacterial species could not reduce sulphate more than 34% using this substrate. However, on average, watermelon rind was found as the most appropriate carbon source for the cultivation of SRB and all the SRB species reduced sulphate efficiently in the range of 40–63% using this carbon source. Our findings of the present study prove the productive utility of fruit wastes for developing cost-effective and environmental-friendly remedial strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 41
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] LICHENS AS SPECIFIC AND COST-EFFECTIVE BIOLOGICAL INDICATORS OF URBAN CARBON MONOXIDE CONCENTRATION
    Coghill, Tamara Galonja
    Kostadinovic, Ljiljana
    Micic, Ruzica
    Nuhanovic, Miralem
    Avdic, Pasaga
    Jahic, Miralem
    Stojnic, Milica
    FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2015, 24 (12): : 4279 - 4284
  • [22] Industrial wastes as carbon sources in biological denitrification
    Skrinde, J.R.
    Bhagat, S.K.
    Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation, 1982, 54 (04): : 370 - 377
  • [23] Carbon capture could be cost-effective
    Brainard, Jeffrey
    SCIENCE, 2018, 360 (6393) : 1050 - 1050
  • [24] Upcycling Food Wastes as a Cost-Effective Nutrient Media in Bacterial Rubberized Mortar for Carbon Sequestering
    Gupta, Sanchit
    Rajpoot, Shivam
    Thakare, Akshay Anil
    Jha, Hem Chandra
    Chaudhary, Sandeep
    WASTE AND BIOMASS VALORIZATION, 2025,
  • [25] COST-EFFECTIVE SENSORS IN ROBOTIC APPLICATION
    RABIE, AM
    NAGI, F
    ROBOTS 13: CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 1989, : G27 - G33
  • [26] IS WHITE CELL-REDUCTION COST-EFFECTIVE
    PERKINS, HA
    TRANSFUSION, 1993, 33 (08) : 626 - 628
  • [27] Cost-effective and surgically effective lung volume reduction surgery
    Mack, MJ
    CHEST, 1997, 111 (02) : 268 - 268
  • [28] Diode sources make cancer treatments cost-effective
    Ignatius, R
    Ignatius, M
    LASER FOCUS WORLD, 1998, 34 (07): : 139 - 143
  • [29] Cost Reduction in the Process of Biological Denitrification by Choosing Traditional or Alternative Carbon Sources
    Brozincevic, Andrijana
    Grgas, Dijana
    Stefanac, Tea
    Habuda-Stanic, Mirna
    Zelic, Bruno
    Dragicevic, Tibela Landeka
    ENERGIES, 2024, 17 (15)