The Interplay of Cognitive Load, Learners' Resources and Self-regulation

被引:8
|
作者
Seufert, Tina [1 ]
Hamm, Verena [1 ]
Vogt, Andrea [1 ]
Riemer, Valentin [1 ]
机构
[1] Ulm Univ, Inst Psychol & Educ, Fac Engn Comp Sci & Psychol, Dept Learning & Instruct, Albert Einstein Allee 47, D-89069 Ulm, Germany
关键词
Self-regulated learning; Task difficulty; Learners' resources; Cognitive load; GOAL ORIENTATION; UNIVERSITY-STUDENTS; CUE-UTILIZATION; MOTIVATION; ACHIEVEMENT; PERFORMANCE; METACOGNITION; CLASSROOM; EMOTIONS; PERSPECTIVE;
D O I
10.1007/s10648-024-09890-1
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Self-regulated learning depends on task difficulty and on learners' resources and cognitive load, as described by an inverted U-shaped relationship in Seufert's (2018) model: for easy tasks, resources are high and load is low, so there is no need to regulate, whereas for difficult tasks, load is too high and resources are too low to regulate. Only at moderate task difficulty do learners regulate, as resources and load are in equilibrium. The purpose of this study is to validate this model, i.e., the inverted U-shaped relationship between task difficulty and self-regulatory activities, as well as learner resources and cognitive load as mediators. In the within-subject study, 67 participants reported their cognitive and metacognitive strategy use for four exams of varying difficulty. For each exam task difficulty, cognitive load, and available resources (such as prior knowledge, interest, etc.) were assessed. Multilevel analysis revealed an inverted U-shaped relationship between task difficulty and the use of cognitive strategies. For metacognitive strategies, only a linear relationship was found. Increasing cognitive load mediated these relationship patterns. For learner resources we found a competitive mediation, indicating that further mediators could be relevant. In future investigations a broader range of task difficulty should be examined.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Turning a Blind Eye to Temptation: How Cognitive Load Can Facilitate Self-Regulation
    Van Dillen, Lotte F.
    Papies, Esther K.
    Hofmann, Wilhelm
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 104 (03) : 427 - 443
  • [22] Navigating the online learning journey by self-regulation: Teachers as learners
    Feldman-Maggor, Yael
    Tuvi-Arad, Inbal
    Blonder, Ron
    COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2024, 219
  • [23] Cognitive and emotional aspects of self-regulation in preschoolers
    Liebermann, Dana
    Giesbrecht, Gerald E.
    Mueller, Ulrich
    COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT, 2007, 22 (04) : 511 - 529
  • [24] Self-regulation of Cognitive States: a Conceptual Perspective
    Yusupov, Mark G.
    Prokhorov, Alexander O.
    Chernov, Albert, V
    VI INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON TEACHER EDUCATION, 2020, : 2805 - 2815
  • [25] Young learners' motivation, self-regulation and performance in personalized learning
    Kevin, Ackermans
    Bakker, Marjoke
    van Loon, Anne-Marieke
    Kral, Marijke
    Camp, Gino
    COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2025, 226
  • [26] Cognitive control and self-regulation in children with ADHD
    Gawrilow, Caterina
    Schmitt, Kathrin
    Rauch, Wolfgang
    KINDHEIT UND ENTWICKLUNG, 2011, 20 (01): : 41 - 48
  • [27] Developmental differences in young children's implied use of cognitive resources in their self-regulation strategies
    Cardwell, Gabrielle Sky
    Cole, Pamela M.
    Weaver, Brooke
    Leadbeater, Jenna M.
    Lunkenheimer, Erika S.
    Buss, Kristin A.
    Gatzke-Kopp, Lisa
    Ram, Nilam
    SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT, 2025, 34 (01)
  • [28] Does self-regulation require cognitive resources? Evaluation of resource allocation models of goal setting
    DeShon, RP
    Brown, KG
    Greenis, JL
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 81 (05) : 595 - 608
  • [29] THE EFFECTS OF SELF-REGULATION ON CONCURRENT COGNITIVE PROCESSING
    KANFER, FH
    STEVENSON, MK
    COGNITIVE THERAPY AND RESEARCH, 1985, 9 (06) : 667 - 684
  • [30] SELF-REGULATION AND COGNITIVE STRATEGIES IN SPORT PARTICIPATION
    CHEN, DP
    SINGER, RN
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORT PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 23 (04) : 277 - 300