Visual Representations on High School Biology, Chemistry, Earth Science, and Physics Assessments

被引:0
|
作者
Nicole D. LaDue
Julie C. Libarkin
Stephen R. Thomas
机构
[1] Northern Illinois University,Department of Geology and Environmental Geosciences
[2] Michigan State University,Geocognition Research Lab
[3] Michigan State University,Department of Zoology
关键词
Assessment; K-12; Science; Visual representations; Diagrams; Graphs;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The pervasive use of visual representations in textbooks, curricula, and assessments underscores their importance in K-12 science education. For example, visual representations figure prominently in the recent publication of the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS Lead States in Next generation science standards: for states, by states. Achieve, Inc. on behalf of the twenty-six states and partners that collaborated on the NGSS, 2013). Although assessments of the NGSS have yet to be developed, most students are currently evaluated on their ability to interpret science visuals. While numerous studies exist on particular visuals, it is unclear whether the same types of visuals are emphasized in all science disciplines. The present study is an evaluation of the similarities and differences of visuals used to assess students’ knowledge of chemistry, earth science, living environment (biology), and physics on the New York State Regents examination. Analysis of 266 distinct visual representations categorized across the four content examinations reveals that the frequency and type of visuals vary greatly between disciplines. Diagrams, Graphs, Tables, and Maps are the most prevalent across all science disciplines. Maps, Cartograms, and Time Charts are unique to the Earth Science examination, and Network Diagrams are unique to the living environment (biology) examination. This study identifies which representations are most critical for training students across the science disciplines in anticipation of the implementation and eventual assessment of the NGSS.
引用
收藏
页码:818 / 834
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of Physics, Chemistry, and Biology Teachers' Perceptions of Nature of Science and Domains of Science
    Kaya, Ebru
    Erduran, Sibel
    SCIENCE & EDUCATION, 2024,
  • [22] Analysis of Five Junior High School Physics Textbooks Used in China for Representations of Nature of Science
    Li, Xiying
    Tan, Zuyu
    Shen, Jiliang
    Hu, Weiping
    Chen, Yinghe
    Wang, Jingying
    RESEARCH IN SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2020, 50 (03) : 833 - 844
  • [24] Didactic Proposal to include Nanoscience and Nanotechnology at high School curriculum linking Physics, Chemistry and Biology
    Quirola, Nayareth
    Marquez, Valentina
    Tecpan, Silvia
    Baltazar, Samuel E.
    XX CHILEAN PHYSICS SYMPOSIUM, 2018, 1043
  • [25] Evaluating the Effectiveness of Integrating Food Science Lessons in High School Biology Curriculum in Comparison to High School Chemistry Curriculum
    Stringer, Elizabeth, I
    Hendrix, Jasmine D.
    Swortzel, Kirk A.
    Williams, J. Byron
    Schilling, M. Wes
    JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2019, 18 (01): : 21 - 28
  • [26] Integrated Chemistry-Biology as a two-year science sequence in high school
    Pagnotta, Marco
    Males, Nancy
    Solis, Victoria
    Park, Jane
    McNeil, Donald
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 242
  • [27] CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS IN THE HORACE MANN HIGH SCHOOL
    Woodhull, John F.
    TEACHERS COLLEGE RECORD, 1902, 3 (02): : 2 - 51
  • [28] CHEMISTRY AS A SCIENCE IN THE HIGH-SCHOOL
    STRONG, LE
    SCHOOL REVIEW, 1962, 70 (01): : 44 - 50
  • [29] UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE IN HIGH-SCHOOL PHYSICS
    CRUMB, GH
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 1965, 3 (03) : 246 - 250
  • [30] The Integration of Nature of Science in the New Secondary Physics, Chemistry, and Biology Curricula
    Sardag, Metin
    Aydin, Sevgi
    Kalender, Nesibe
    Tortumlu, Selma
    Ciftci, Murat
    Perihanoglu, Seyma
    EGITIM VE BILIM-EDUCATION AND SCIENCE, 2014, 39 (174): : 233 - 248