Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Endocrine Therapy for Older Patients with Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer: Comparison of Approaches

被引:0
|
作者
Miller, Krislyn N. [1 ]
Thomas, Samantha M. [2 ,3 ]
Record, Sydney M. [1 ]
Rosenberger, Laura H. [1 ,2 ]
DiNome, Maggie L. [1 ,2 ]
DiLalla, Gayle [1 ,2 ]
Force, Jeremy M. [2 ,4 ]
Hwang, E. Shelley [1 ,2 ]
Plichta, Jennifer K. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ Med Ctr DUMC, Dept Surg, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Duke Canc Inst, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Biostat & Bioinformat, Durham, NC USA
[4] Duke Univ, Dept Med, Med Ctr, Durham, NC USA
[5] Duke Univ, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Med Ctr, Durham, NC 27708 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Breast cancer; Elderly; Survival; Neoadjuvant therapy; Pathologic complete response; OUTCOMES; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1245/s10434-023-13880-y
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundBenefits of a pathologic complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant therapy are well established, yet outcomes for older women are understudied. We sought to examine the pCR and overall survival (OS) rates of women with estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer across age groups.MethodsWomen diagnosed with cT1-4, N0-3, M0, ER+/HER2- breast cancer (2010-2018) who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) or neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) followed by surgery were selected from the National Cancer Database and categorized by age. Differences were tested, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the association of response with OS after adjustment for covariates.ResultsIn the 43,009-patient cohort, 84.8% received NACT and 15.2% received NET. Of those aged & GE; 70 (N = 5623), 51.0% received NACT, and 49.0% received NET. Compared with younger women receiving NACT, older women were less likely to have a breast or nodal pCR [no pCR by age: 85.1% (& GE; 70 years) vs 82.2% (50-69 years) vs 77.7% (< 50 years), p < 0.001]. Rates of pCR were similarly low for all women receiving NET [no pCR by age: 95.6% (& GE; 70 years) vs 95% (50-69 years) vs 96% (< 50 years), p = 0.06]. After adjustment, pCR after NACT was not associated with OS for older patients, but better survival outcomes were noted for older patients achieving pCR after NET.ConclusionFor women with ER+/HER2- breast cancer, pCR rates after NACT are lower in older women compared with younger women, and are equally low after NET for all women. However, pCR after NET is associated with improved OS among older women, unlike pCR after NACT.
引用
收藏
页码:6141 / 6150
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Estrogen receptor gene fusions drive endocrine therapy resistance in estrogen receptor positive breast cancer
    Lei, Jonathan T.
    Shao, Jieya
    Zhang, Jin
    Iglesia, Michael
    Chan, Doug W.
    Matsunuma, Ryoichi
    He, Xiaping
    Singh, Purba
    Kosaka, Yoshimasa
    Crowder, Robert
    Haricharan, Svasti
    Kavuri, Shyam
    Hoog, Jeremy
    Phommaly, Chanpheng
    Goncalves, Rodrigo
    Romalho, Susana
    Lai, Wei-Chu
    Hampton, Oliver
    Rogers, Anna
    Tobias, Ethan
    Parikh, Poojan
    Davies, Sherri
    Ma, Cynthia
    Suman, Vera
    Hunt, Kelly
    Watson, Mark
    Hoadley, Katherine A.
    Thompson, Aubrey
    Perou, Charles
    Creighton, Chad J.
    Maher, Chris
    Ellis, Matthew J.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 77
  • [22] Predictors of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.
    Moore, Halle C. F.
    Maiti, Baidehi
    Rybicki, Lisa A.
    Booth, Christine
    Abraham, Jame
    Budd, G. Thomas
    Andresen, Steven Ware
    Downs-Kelly, Erinn
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15)
  • [23] Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not associated with improved survival for estrogen receptor positive/negative breast cancer
    Johnson, Jeffrey
    Barmparas, Galinos
    Chung, Alice
    Manguso, Nicholas
    Giuliano, Armando
    Amersi, Farin
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 24 : 138 - 139
  • [24] Breast-conserving surgery after preoperative endocrine therapy versus chemotherapy in postmenopausal patients with estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer
    Semiglazov, V. F.
    Semiglazov, V. V.
    Dashyan, G. A.
    Manikhas, A. G.
    Ziltsova, E. K.
    Malodusheva, A. A.
    Ivanov, V. G.
    Donskih, R. V.
    Paltuev, R. M.
    Kletsel, A. E.
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2010, 8 (03): : 60 - 60
  • [25] ASO Visual Abstract: Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy as an Alternative to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Among Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer Patients—Pathologic and Surgical Outcomes
    Lifen Cao
    Kavin Sugumar
    Eleanor Keller
    Pamela Li
    Lisa Rock
    Ashley Simpson
    Alberto J. Montero
    Mary Freyvogel
    Robert Shenk
    Megan E. Miller
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2021, 28 : 657 - 658
  • [26] Metabolomic rewiring in endocrine therapy resistant estrogen receptor positive breast cancer
    Ahn, Songyeon
    Park, Junhyoung
    Grimm, Sandra L.
    Piyarathna, Badrajee Wb
    Putluri, Nagireddy
    Das, Gokul
    Coarfa, Cristian
    Kaipparettu, Benny A.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 83 (07)
  • [27] microRNA Regulation in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer and Endocrine Therapy
    Erin W. Howard
    Xiaohe Yang
    Biological Procedures Online, 2018, 20
  • [28] microRNA Regulation in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer and Endocrine Therapy
    Howard, Erin W.
    Yang, Xiaohe
    BIOLOGICAL PROCEDURES ONLINE, 2018, 20
  • [29] Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer: Comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis
    Spring, L.
    Gupta, A.
    Reynolds, K. L.
    Gadd, M. A.
    Isakoff, S. J.
    Ellisen, L. W.
    Moy, B.
    Bardia, A.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 76
  • [30] Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy expands stromal populations that predict poor prognosis in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer
    Brechbuhl, Heather M.
    Xie, Mengyu
    Kopin, Etana G.
    Han, Amy L.
    Vinod-Paul, Kiran
    Hagen, Jaime
    Edgerton, Susan
    Owens, Philip
    Sams, Sharon
    Elias, Anthony
    Sartorius, Carol A.
    Tan, Aik-Choon
    Kabos, Peter
    MOLECULAR CARCINOGENESIS, 2022, 61 (03) : 359 - 371